"Creatures of habit": influential factors to the adoption of computer personalization and accessibility settings.

IF 2.1 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS Universal Access in the Information Society Pub Date : 2023-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s10209-023-00984-1
Rachel Wood, Meagan Griffith, J Bern Jordan, Gregg Vanderheiden, Jonathan Lazar, Maureen Kaine-Krolak, Matthew Ryson, Amarja Desai, David Folmar
{"title":"\"Creatures of habit\": influential factors to the adoption of computer personalization and accessibility settings.","authors":"Rachel Wood,&nbsp;Meagan Griffith,&nbsp;J Bern Jordan,&nbsp;Gregg Vanderheiden,&nbsp;Jonathan Lazar,&nbsp;Maureen Kaine-Krolak,&nbsp;Matthew Ryson,&nbsp;Amarja Desai,&nbsp;David Folmar","doi":"10.1007/s10209-023-00984-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Customizing the accessibility and ease-of-use settings of a computer can improve the overall user experience for people with and without disabilities. However, the adoption of such settings remains poor. This study investigates <i>why</i> various factors may influence people as they personalize and <i>when</i> they choose to integrate those changes into everyday use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To better understand how these factors may impact people's personalization process, we conducted a series of interviews involving 15 people with and without disabilities across several months in 2020 when computer usage became required due to the COVID-19 lockdown. We used grounded theory to analyze 49 semi-structured interviews with participants. During these interviews, people reflected upon: past attempts at personalization using built-in accessibility or ease-of-use features of their Operating System (OS) or other assistive technologies (AT), current customization activities using the personalization software, Morphic, and future opportunities for personalization systems and features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified several barriers, facilitators, and perpetuating factors that can influence <i>why</i> and <i>when</i> people choose to adopt and integrate their personalization changes. We also outline the overall personalization lifecycle, which illustrates when various factors may impact computer personalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Personalization activities are complex and easily affected by an ecosystem of influential factors that surround them. When paired with the three design considerations and ten lessons learned from this qualitative study, the overall personalization lifecycle may be useful during the design and development of future personalization systems or features for people with and without disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":49115,"journal":{"name":"Universal Access in the Information Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985475/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universal Access in the Information Society","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-00984-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Customizing the accessibility and ease-of-use settings of a computer can improve the overall user experience for people with and without disabilities. However, the adoption of such settings remains poor. This study investigates why various factors may influence people as they personalize and when they choose to integrate those changes into everyday use.

Methods: To better understand how these factors may impact people's personalization process, we conducted a series of interviews involving 15 people with and without disabilities across several months in 2020 when computer usage became required due to the COVID-19 lockdown. We used grounded theory to analyze 49 semi-structured interviews with participants. During these interviews, people reflected upon: past attempts at personalization using built-in accessibility or ease-of-use features of their Operating System (OS) or other assistive technologies (AT), current customization activities using the personalization software, Morphic, and future opportunities for personalization systems and features.

Results: We identified several barriers, facilitators, and perpetuating factors that can influence why and when people choose to adopt and integrate their personalization changes. We also outline the overall personalization lifecycle, which illustrates when various factors may impact computer personalization.

Conclusion: Personalization activities are complex and easily affected by an ecosystem of influential factors that surround them. When paired with the three design considerations and ten lessons learned from this qualitative study, the overall personalization lifecycle may be useful during the design and development of future personalization systems or features for people with and without disabilities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“习惯的创造者”:采用计算机个性化和无障碍设置的影响因素。
目的:自定义计算机的无障碍性和易用性设置可以改善残疾人和非残疾人的整体用户体验。然而,采用这种环境的情况仍然很差。这项研究调查了为什么当人们个性化时,以及当他们选择将这些变化融入日常使用时,各种因素可能会影响他们。方法:为了更好地了解这些因素如何影响人们的个性化过程,我们在2020年的几个月里对15名残疾人和非残疾人进行了一系列采访,当时由于新冠肺炎封锁,需要使用计算机。我们使用扎根理论分析了49个参与者的半结构化访谈。在这些采访中,人们反思了:过去使用操作系统(OS)或其他辅助技术(at)的内置可访问性或易用性功能进行个性化的尝试,当前使用个性化软件Morphic的定制活动,以及个性化系统和功能的未来机会。结果:我们确定了几个障碍、促进因素和持久因素,这些因素可以影响人们为什么以及何时选择采用和整合他们的个性化变化。我们还概述了整个个性化生命周期,说明了各种因素何时可能影响计算机个性化。结论:个性化活动是复杂的,很容易受到周围影响因素生态系统的影响。当结合这项定性研究中的三个设计考虑因素和十个经验教训时,在为残疾人和非残疾人设计和开发未来个性化系统或功能时,整个个性化生命周期可能会很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Universal Access in the Information Society
Universal Access in the Information Society COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Universal Access in the Information Society (UAIS) is an international, interdisciplinary refereed journal that solicits original research contributions addressing the accessibility, usability, and, ultimately, acceptability of Information Society Technologies by anyone, anywhere, at anytime, and through any media and device. Universal access refers to the conscious and systematic effort to proactively apply principles, methods and tools of universal design order to develop Information Society Technologies that are accessible and usable by all citizens, including the very young and the elderly and people with different types of disabilities, thus avoiding the need for a posteriori adaptations or specialized design. The journal''s unique focus is on theoretical, methodological, and empirical research, of both technological and non-technological nature, that addresses equitable access and active participation of potentially all citizens in the information society.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the effectiveness of preschool English learning applications based on touch and voice multimodal interaction technique A scientometric analysis of research on people with visual impairments in the field of HCI design: mapping the intellectual structure and evolution Website accessibility evaluation of the federal government of Nepal Media accessibility: in search for alliances Universal and ecological design in media accessibility: finding common ground
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1