EVALUATION OF PHENOTYPIC AND MOLECULAR TECHNIQUE IN THE DETECTION OF EXTENDED SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL)-PRODUCING GRAM NEGATIVE BACILLI IN OGUN STATE, NIGERIA.

T A Ajani, C J Elikwu, C G Anaedobe, C N Onwuzo, B Tayo, C C Okangba, O B Makanjuola
{"title":"EVALUATION OF PHENOTYPIC AND MOLECULAR TECHNIQUE IN THE DETECTION OF EXTENDED SPECTRUM BETA-LACTAMASE (ESBL)-PRODUCING GRAM NEGATIVE BACILLI IN OGUN STATE, NIGERIA.","authors":"T A Ajani,&nbsp;C J Elikwu,&nbsp;C G Anaedobe,&nbsp;C N Onwuzo,&nbsp;B Tayo,&nbsp;C C Okangba,&nbsp;O B Makanjuola","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Molecular diagnosis though faster and more sensitive than phenotypic techniques, is more expensive. Resource limited settings are thus limited to using more of phenotypic rather than molecular methods in the routine detection of Extended Spectrum beta lactamases (ESBL).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the performance of double disc synergy test (DSST) and Epsilometer (E) test with Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and to detect the risk factors associated with ESBL producing organisms among in-patients at Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilishan-Remo, Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Hospital-based cross-sectional study in which bacterial isolates of 165 in-patients were collected fromMarch 2018 to September 2019. The isolates were evaluated for ESBL production by the use of DDST, Etest and PCR. The performance evaluation was done. Questionnaire was used to assess the risk factors associated with ESBL, IBM SPSS Version 23 was used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants' isolates yielded 50/165 (30.3%) that were ESBL positive by DDST, 47/165 (28.9%) by E-test and 48/165(29.1%) by PCR. Sensitivity and specificity of DSST was 100% and 98.3% while that of E-test was 98% and 100% respectively. Age, antibiotics intake without prescription, being on ventilator, urethral catheterization and nasogastric tubes were all significantly associated with presence of ESBL (p value <0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Phenotypic tests remain reliable for the routine detection of ESBL in the absence of molecular methods. Rational use of instrumentation and antibiotics is advocated based on the risk factors detected from this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":72221,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/33/8a/AIPM-20-160.PMC10295097.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Molecular diagnosis though faster and more sensitive than phenotypic techniques, is more expensive. Resource limited settings are thus limited to using more of phenotypic rather than molecular methods in the routine detection of Extended Spectrum beta lactamases (ESBL).

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of double disc synergy test (DSST) and Epsilometer (E) test with Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and to detect the risk factors associated with ESBL producing organisms among in-patients at Babcock University Teaching Hospital, Ilishan-Remo, Nigeria.

Methodology: Hospital-based cross-sectional study in which bacterial isolates of 165 in-patients were collected fromMarch 2018 to September 2019. The isolates were evaluated for ESBL production by the use of DDST, Etest and PCR. The performance evaluation was done. Questionnaire was used to assess the risk factors associated with ESBL, IBM SPSS Version 23 was used to analyze the data.

Results: The participants' isolates yielded 50/165 (30.3%) that were ESBL positive by DDST, 47/165 (28.9%) by E-test and 48/165(29.1%) by PCR. Sensitivity and specificity of DSST was 100% and 98.3% while that of E-test was 98% and 100% respectively. Age, antibiotics intake without prescription, being on ventilator, urethral catheterization and nasogastric tubes were all significantly associated with presence of ESBL (p value <0.05).

Conclusion: Phenotypic tests remain reliable for the routine detection of ESBL in the absence of molecular methods. Rational use of instrumentation and antibiotics is advocated based on the risk factors detected from this study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚奥贡州产广谱β -内酰胺酶(esbl)的革兰氏阴性杆菌检测的表型和分子技术评价。
背景:分子诊断虽然比表型技术更快、更敏感,但也更昂贵。因此,在资源有限的情况下,在常规检测扩展谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBL)时,仅限于使用更多的表型方法而不是分子方法。目的:本研究旨在评价聚合酶链反应(PCR)双盘协同试验(DSST)和Epsilometer (E)试验在尼日利亚ilshan - remo巴布科克大学教学医院住院患者中的表现,并检测与ESBL产生菌相关的危险因素。方法:以医院为基础的横断面研究,收集2018年3月至2019年9月期间165名住院患者的细菌分离株。采用DDST、Etest和PCR对分离株进行ESBL生产鉴定。进行了性能评价。采用问卷法对ESBL相关危险因素进行评估,采用IBM SPSS Version 23对数据进行分析。结果:各分离株DDST检测为ESBL阳性,分别为50/165株(30.3%)、47/165株(28.9%)和48/165株(29.1%)。DSST的敏感性为100%,特异性为98.3%,E-test的敏感性为98%,特异性为100%。年龄、无处方使用抗生素、使用呼吸机、导尿和鼻胃管与ESBL存在显著相关(p值)。结论:在没有分子检测方法的情况下,表型检测对ESBL的常规检测仍然是可靠的。根据本研究发现的危险因素,提倡合理使用仪器和抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ASSESSMENT OF THE LEVEL OF AWARENESS, KNOWLEDGE, AND RISK PERCEPTION OF COMMUNITY MEMBERS ABOUT MPOX INFECTION IN NIGERIA. BODY STALK ANOMALY: CLINICAL AND HISTOPATHOLOGIC FINDINGS OF THIS RARE ANOMALY IN A NIGERIAN NEWBORN. CLINICAL PROFILE AND PATTERN OF DEMENTIA IN A GERIATRIC CENTRE. CURRENT LINES AND ANGLES USED IN PAEDIATRIC FOOT RADIOGRAPH: A SCOPING REVIEW OF LITERATURE. DETERMINANTS OF OUTCOME OF NEONATAL SURGICAL EMERGENCIES IN GOMBE: A 3-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1