Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores.

Chih-Chiun J Chang, Omar Moussa, Royce W S Chen, Lora R Dagi Glass, George A Cioffi, Jeffrey M Liebmann, Bryan J Winn
{"title":"Exploring Potential Schedule-Related and Gender Biases in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Scores.","authors":"Chih-Chiun J Chang,&nbsp;Omar Moussa,&nbsp;Royce W S Chen,&nbsp;Lora R Dagi Glass,&nbsp;George A Cioffi,&nbsp;Jeffrey M Liebmann,&nbsp;Bryan J Winn","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1744272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>  Prior studies have revealed grading discrepancies in evaluation of personal statements and letters of recommendation based on candidate's race and gender. Fatigue and the end-of-day phenomenon can negatively impact task performance but have not been studied in the residency selection process. Our primary objective is to determine whether factors related to interview time and day as well as candidate's and interviewer's gender have a significant effect on residency interview scores. <b>Methods</b>  Seven years of ophthalmology residency candidate evaluation scores from 2013 to 2019 were collected at a single academic institution, standardized by interviewer into relative percentiles (0-100 point grading scale), and grouped into the following categories for comparisons: different interview days (Day 1 vs. Day 2), morning versus afternoon (AM vs. PM), interview session (Day 1 AM/PM vs. Day 2 AM/PM), before and after breaks (morning break, lunch break, and afternoon break), residency candidate's gender, and interviewer's gender. <b>Results</b>  Candidates in the morning sessions were found to have higher scores than afternoon sessions (52.75 vs. 49.28, <i>p</i>  < 0.001). Interview scores in the early morning, late morning, and early afternoon were higher than late afternoon scores (54.47, 53.01, 52.15 vs. 46.74, <i>p</i>  < 0.001). Across all interview years, there were no differences in scores received before and after morning breaks (51.71 vs. 52.83, <i>p</i>  = 0.49), lunch breaks (53.01 vs. 52.15, <i>p</i>  = 0.58), and afternoon breaks (50.35 vs. 48.30, <i>p</i>  = 0.21). No differences were found in scores received by female versus male candidates (51.55 vs. 50.49, <i>p</i>  = 0.21) or scores given by female versus male interviewers (51.31 vs. 50.84, <i>p</i>  = 0.58). <b>Conclusion</b>  Afternoon residency candidate interview scores, especially late afternoon, were significantly lower than morning scores, suggesting the need to further study the effects of interviewer's fatigue in the residency interview process. The interview day, presence of break times, candidate's gender, and interviewer's gender had no significant effects on interview score.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"14 2","pages":"e153-e165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e9/8a/10-1055-s-0042-1744272.PMC9927985.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose  Prior studies have revealed grading discrepancies in evaluation of personal statements and letters of recommendation based on candidate's race and gender. Fatigue and the end-of-day phenomenon can negatively impact task performance but have not been studied in the residency selection process. Our primary objective is to determine whether factors related to interview time and day as well as candidate's and interviewer's gender have a significant effect on residency interview scores. Methods  Seven years of ophthalmology residency candidate evaluation scores from 2013 to 2019 were collected at a single academic institution, standardized by interviewer into relative percentiles (0-100 point grading scale), and grouped into the following categories for comparisons: different interview days (Day 1 vs. Day 2), morning versus afternoon (AM vs. PM), interview session (Day 1 AM/PM vs. Day 2 AM/PM), before and after breaks (morning break, lunch break, and afternoon break), residency candidate's gender, and interviewer's gender. Results  Candidates in the morning sessions were found to have higher scores than afternoon sessions (52.75 vs. 49.28, p  < 0.001). Interview scores in the early morning, late morning, and early afternoon were higher than late afternoon scores (54.47, 53.01, 52.15 vs. 46.74, p  < 0.001). Across all interview years, there were no differences in scores received before and after morning breaks (51.71 vs. 52.83, p  = 0.49), lunch breaks (53.01 vs. 52.15, p  = 0.58), and afternoon breaks (50.35 vs. 48.30, p  = 0.21). No differences were found in scores received by female versus male candidates (51.55 vs. 50.49, p  = 0.21) or scores given by female versus male interviewers (51.31 vs. 50.84, p  = 0.58). Conclusion  Afternoon residency candidate interview scores, especially late afternoon, were significantly lower than morning scores, suggesting the need to further study the effects of interviewer's fatigue in the residency interview process. The interview day, presence of break times, candidate's gender, and interviewer's gender had no significant effects on interview score.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨眼科住院医师访谈分数中潜在的时间相关偏见和性别偏见。
目的以往的研究已经揭示了基于候选人种族和性别的个人陈述和推荐信的评分差异。疲劳和一天结束现象会对任务绩效产生负面影响,但尚未在住院医师选择过程中进行研究。我们的主要目标是确定与面试时间和日期以及候选人和面试官的性别相关的因素是否对住院医师面试分数有显著影响。方法收集某一学术机构2013 - 2019年7年眼科住院医师候选人评估成绩,由访谈者将其标准化为相对百分位数(0-100分制),并将其分为以下类别进行比较:不同的面试天数(第一天vs第二天),上午vs下午(上午vs下午),面试环节(第一天上午/下午vs第二天上午/下午),休息前后(上午,午餐和下午休息),住院医师候选人的性别,面试官的性别。结果上午考试的考生得分高于下午考试(52.75比49.28,p p p = 0.49)、午休(53.01比52.15,p = 0.58)和下午休息(50.35比48.30,p = 0.21)。男女面试者的分数(51.55比50.49,p = 0.21)和男女面试者的分数(51.31比50.84,p = 0.58)没有差异。结论下午住院医师面试得分显著低于上午,特别是下午晚些时候,需要进一步研究面试官疲劳对住院医师面试过程的影响。面试日、休息时间、应试者性别、面试官性别对面试得分无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data. Self-Reported Perceptions of Preparedness among Incoming Ophthalmology Residents. The Matthew Effect: Prevalence of Doctor and Physician Parents among Ophthalmology Applicants. Gender Representation on North American Ophthalmology Societies' Governance Boards. The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1