Relative Importance of Applicant Characteristics in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Selection: A Survey of Program Directors.

Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017) Pub Date : 2022-10-12 eCollection Date: 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1756122
Samuel A Cohen, Suzann Pershing
{"title":"Relative Importance of Applicant Characteristics in Ophthalmology Residency Interview Selection: A Survey of Program Directors.","authors":"Samuel A Cohen, Suzann Pershing","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1756122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  Ophthalmology residency positions remain competitive. A lack of clarity regarding which residency selection criteria are prioritized by program directors can heighten the stress associated with the match process. While surveys of program directors in several other medical specialties have been conducted to identify the most important residency selection criteria, there is limited data on selection criteria used by ophthalmology residency program directors. The purpose of our study was to survey ophthalmology residency program directors to identify the current state of interview selection decisions-the factors currently considered most important in determining whether to extend an interview invitation to residency applicants. <b>Methods</b>  We developed and distributed a Web-based questionnaire to all U.S. ophthalmology residency program directors. Questions evaluated program demographics and the relative importance of 23 different selection criteria used by ophthalmology residency program directors when evaluating applicants for residency interviews (Likert scale 1-5, with 1 being \"not important\" and 5 being \"very important\"). Program directors were also asked to identify the one factor they felt was most important. <b>Results</b>  The overall residency program director response rate was 56.5% (70/124). The selection criteria with the highest average importance scores were core clinical clerkship grades (4.26/5) followed by letters of recommendation (4.06/5), and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score (4.03/5). The most frequently cited single most important factor for interview selection was core clinical clerkship grades (18/70, 25.7%), with USMLE Step 1 score (9/70, 12.9%) and rotations at the program director's department (6/70, 8.6%) also commonly reported. <b>Conclusion</b>  Our results suggest that core clinical clerkship grades, letters of recommendation, and USMLE Step 1 scores are deemed the most important selection criteria by ophthalmology residency program directors as of a 2021 survey. With changes in clerkship grading for many medical schools and changes in national USMLE Step 1 score reporting, programs will face challenges in evaluating applicants and the relative importance of other selection criteria will likely increase.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"14 2","pages":"e246-e256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b1/1f/10-1055-s-0042-1756122.PMC9927967.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  Ophthalmology residency positions remain competitive. A lack of clarity regarding which residency selection criteria are prioritized by program directors can heighten the stress associated with the match process. While surveys of program directors in several other medical specialties have been conducted to identify the most important residency selection criteria, there is limited data on selection criteria used by ophthalmology residency program directors. The purpose of our study was to survey ophthalmology residency program directors to identify the current state of interview selection decisions-the factors currently considered most important in determining whether to extend an interview invitation to residency applicants. Methods  We developed and distributed a Web-based questionnaire to all U.S. ophthalmology residency program directors. Questions evaluated program demographics and the relative importance of 23 different selection criteria used by ophthalmology residency program directors when evaluating applicants for residency interviews (Likert scale 1-5, with 1 being "not important" and 5 being "very important"). Program directors were also asked to identify the one factor they felt was most important. Results  The overall residency program director response rate was 56.5% (70/124). The selection criteria with the highest average importance scores were core clinical clerkship grades (4.26/5) followed by letters of recommendation (4.06/5), and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score (4.03/5). The most frequently cited single most important factor for interview selection was core clinical clerkship grades (18/70, 25.7%), with USMLE Step 1 score (9/70, 12.9%) and rotations at the program director's department (6/70, 8.6%) also commonly reported. Conclusion  Our results suggest that core clinical clerkship grades, letters of recommendation, and USMLE Step 1 scores are deemed the most important selection criteria by ophthalmology residency program directors as of a 2021 survey. With changes in clerkship grading for many medical schools and changes in national USMLE Step 1 score reporting, programs will face challenges in evaluating applicants and the relative importance of other selection criteria will likely increase.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼科住院医师面试选拔中申请人特征的相对重要性:项目主任调查。
导言 眼科住院医师职位仍然竞争激烈。如果项目主任不清楚哪些住院医师遴选标准是优先考虑的,就会增加与匹配过程相关的压力。虽然对其他几个医学专业的项目主任进行了调查,以确定最重要的住院医师遴选标准,但有关眼科住院医师项目主任所使用的遴选标准的数据却很有限。我们研究的目的是对眼科住院医师培训项目主任进行调查,以确定面试遴选决策的现状--目前被认为是决定是否向住院医师培训申请者发出面试邀请的最重要因素。方法 我们开发并向美国所有眼科住院医师培训项目主任分发了一份网络问卷。调查问题包括项目人口统计学以及眼科住院医师培训项目主任在评估住院医师培训面试申请人时所使用的 23 种不同选择标准的相对重要性(李克特量表 1-5,1 表示 "不重要",5 表示 "非常重要")。项目主任还被要求指出他们认为最重要的一个因素。结果 住院医师培训项目主任的总体回复率为 56.5%(70/124)。平均重要性得分最高的选择标准是核心临床实习成绩(4.26/5),其次是推荐信(4.06/5)和美国医学执照考试(USMLE)第 1 步成绩(4.03/5)。核心临床实习成绩(18/70,25.7%)是最常被提及的面试选择的最重要因素,USMLE 第 1 步考试成绩(9/70,12.9%)和在项目主任所在部门的轮转(6/70,8.6%)也是常被提及的因素。结论 我们的研究结果表明,在 2021 年的一项调查中,眼科住院医师培训项目主任认为核心临床实习成绩、推荐信和 USMLE 第 1 步考试成绩是最重要的选择标准。随着许多医学院的实习分级和全国 USMLE 第 1 步分数报告的变化,项目在评估申请者时将面临挑战,其他选择标准的相对重要性可能会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data. Self-Reported Perceptions of Preparedness among Incoming Ophthalmology Residents. The Matthew Effect: Prevalence of Doctor and Physician Parents among Ophthalmology Applicants. Gender Representation on North American Ophthalmology Societies' Governance Boards. The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1