The Impact of Virtual Interviews on the Geographic Distribution of Ophthalmology Match Results in the 2020-2021 Cycle.

Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017) Pub Date : 2021-12-25 eCollection Date: 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1740325
Chandruganesh Rasendran, Sarah Rahman, Uthman Younis, Raoul Wadhwa, Manasvee Kapadia, Jonathan H Lass, Linda H Ohsie-Bajor
{"title":"The Impact of Virtual Interviews on the Geographic Distribution of Ophthalmology Match Results in the 2020-2021 Cycle.","authors":"Chandruganesh Rasendran, Sarah Rahman, Uthman Younis, Raoul Wadhwa, Manasvee Kapadia, Jonathan H Lass, Linda H Ohsie-Bajor","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1740325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Instead of the traditional in-person interviews, the 2020 to 2021 ophthalmology application cycle was conducted with virtual interviews due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019). Little is known about differences between the results of this application cycle with previous years. <b>Objectives</b>  The aim of this study was to determine the effect of virtual interviews on the geographic distribution of matched ophthalmology residency applicants. <b>Methods</b>  Information was collected on the medical school location and matched residency program location for 2020 to 2021 applicants as well as applicants during the 2016 to 2017, 2017 to 2018, and 2018 to 2019 cycles from publicly available Web sites. Pearson chi-squared tests were conducted to determine whether there was a significant difference in the proportion of applicants matching in the same region, state, and institution as their medical schools in the 2020 to 2021 interview cycle when compared with past cycles. <b>Results</b>  Three-hundred seventy-five applicants from 2020 to 2021 and 1,190 applicants from 2016 to 2019 application cycles were analyzed. There was no difference in the type of medical school attended (allopathic vs. osteopathic vs. international medical graduate) ( <i>p</i>  = 0.069), the likelihood of attending a residency program in the same region as the home medical school (54% for 2020-2021 vs. 57% for 2016-2019 applicants, <i>p</i>  = 0.3), and the likelihood of attending a residency program in the same state as the home medical school (31 vs. 28%, <i>p</i>  = 0.2). There was a higher likelihood of applicants during the 2020 to 2021 cycle matching at a residency program affiliated with their home medical school than previous cycles (23 vs. 18%, <i>p</i>  = 0.03). <b>Conclusions</b>  Virtual interviews did not increase the likelihood of medical students staying in the same region or state as their medical school, while there was a higher likelihood of applicants matching at residency programs at institutions affiliated with their medical schools. A hybrid approach to maintain geographic diversity of applicants' final residency programs involving virtual interviews with the addition of in-person away rotations is suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"13 2","pages":"e242-e246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/34/74/10-1055-s-0041-1740325.PMC9927964.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  Instead of the traditional in-person interviews, the 2020 to 2021 ophthalmology application cycle was conducted with virtual interviews due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-2019). Little is known about differences between the results of this application cycle with previous years. Objectives  The aim of this study was to determine the effect of virtual interviews on the geographic distribution of matched ophthalmology residency applicants. Methods  Information was collected on the medical school location and matched residency program location for 2020 to 2021 applicants as well as applicants during the 2016 to 2017, 2017 to 2018, and 2018 to 2019 cycles from publicly available Web sites. Pearson chi-squared tests were conducted to determine whether there was a significant difference in the proportion of applicants matching in the same region, state, and institution as their medical schools in the 2020 to 2021 interview cycle when compared with past cycles. Results  Three-hundred seventy-five applicants from 2020 to 2021 and 1,190 applicants from 2016 to 2019 application cycles were analyzed. There was no difference in the type of medical school attended (allopathic vs. osteopathic vs. international medical graduate) ( p  = 0.069), the likelihood of attending a residency program in the same region as the home medical school (54% for 2020-2021 vs. 57% for 2016-2019 applicants, p  = 0.3), and the likelihood of attending a residency program in the same state as the home medical school (31 vs. 28%, p  = 0.2). There was a higher likelihood of applicants during the 2020 to 2021 cycle matching at a residency program affiliated with their home medical school than previous cycles (23 vs. 18%, p  = 0.03). Conclusions  Virtual interviews did not increase the likelihood of medical students staying in the same region or state as their medical school, while there was a higher likelihood of applicants matching at residency programs at institutions affiliated with their medical schools. A hybrid approach to maintain geographic diversity of applicants' final residency programs involving virtual interviews with the addition of in-person away rotations is suggested.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟面试对 2020-2021 年周期眼科匹配结果地理分布的影响。
背景 由于 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-2019),2020 至 2021 年眼科申请周期不再采用传统的面对面面试,而是采用虚拟面试。人们对这一申请周期的结果与往年的差异知之甚少。目的 本研究旨在确定虚拟面试对匹配的眼科住院医师申请者地理分布的影响。方法 从公开网站上收集了 2020 至 2021 年申请者以及 2016 至 2017 年、2017 至 2018 年和 2018 至 2019 年申请者的医学院所在地和匹配住院医师培训项目所在地的信息。我们进行了皮尔逊卡方检验,以确定与过去的面试周期相比,2020 至 2021 年面试周期中与自己的医学院匹配在同一地区、州和机构的申请人比例是否存在显著差异。结果 对2020至2021年的375名申请人和2016至2019年申请周期的1190名申请人进行了分析。在就读的医学院类型(全科医学院与骨科医学院与国际医学毕业生)(p = 0.069)、就读与母校所在地区相同的住院实习项目的可能性(2020-2021 年为 54%,2016-2019 年为 57%,p = 0.3)以及就读与母校所在州相同的住院实习项目的可能性(31% 与 28%,p = 0.2)方面没有差异。与之前的周期相比,2020 至 2021 年周期的申请者有更大的可能匹配到其母校医学院附属的住院实习项目(23% 对 18%,p = 0.03)。结论 虚拟面试并没有增加医学生留在其医学院所在地区或州的可能性,而申请人在其医学院附属机构的住院实习项目中匹配的可能性更高。建议采用一种混合方法来保持申请者最终住院医师培训项目的地域多样性,即在虚拟面试的基础上增加现场轮转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data. Self-Reported Perceptions of Preparedness among Incoming Ophthalmology Residents. The Matthew Effect: Prevalence of Doctor and Physician Parents among Ophthalmology Applicants. Gender Representation on North American Ophthalmology Societies' Governance Boards. The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1