Evaluating the Impact of a Regional Student-Led Physiotherapy Clinic Model to Improve Self-Reported Function in Community-Dwelling Adults With Neurological Diagnoses.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1097/NPT.0000000000000399
Andrea Hams, Neil Bell, Taryn Jones
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of a Regional Student-Led Physiotherapy Clinic Model to Improve Self-Reported Function in Community-Dwelling Adults With Neurological Diagnoses.","authors":"Andrea Hams,&nbsp;Neil Bell,&nbsp;Taryn Jones","doi":"10.1097/NPT.0000000000000399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Neurological conditions are a major cause of health morbidity that negatively impacts function and quality of life (QoL). Despite this burden, community services are disproportionally scarce. Student-led physiotherapy services (SLSs) are a model that can increase community access to health care while providing authentic clinical experiences for students. SLSs consistently demonstrate high client satisfaction; however, limited evaluation of the impact of this model on the client's clinical outcomes exists. Therefore the aim of this project was to evaluate the impact of a physiotherapy student-led community-based rehabilitation service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SLS operated 4 days a week over a 15-week period. Forty-two community-dwelling clients (mean age 74 years) with a neurological diagnosis were included. During initial consultation, participants completed basic demographics, up to 3 Patient-Specific Functional Scales (PSFSs) and a QoL questionnaire (World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief Questionnaire [WHOQOL-BREF]). At discharge, participants completed the WHOQOL-BREF, PSFS, and a patient experience survey. Risk event data were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over half of the PSFS items targeted mobility (55%). There was a significant improvement (P < 0.05) in median change (quartiles) for pre-/post-PSFS scores for clients whose primary condition was balance 1.0 (0.0-3.0), cerebrovascular accident 1.0 (2.0-3.0) or multiple Sclerosis 1.0 (1.0-2.0), and mean (SD) WHOQOL-BREF scores for Physical Health (12.2 ± 1.5 to 13.1 ± 1.3) and Social Relationships (12.7 ± 2.7 to 16.6 ± 3.3). Patient experience survey results indicated that clients had confidence and trust in students. No adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The SLS model provides a strategy to increase access to health care and clinical placement capacity. Findings demonstrated improved self-rated function, QoL, and positive patient experience for community-dwelling clients with nonacute neurological diagnoses.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A380).</p>","PeriodicalId":49030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Neurological conditions are a major cause of health morbidity that negatively impacts function and quality of life (QoL). Despite this burden, community services are disproportionally scarce. Student-led physiotherapy services (SLSs) are a model that can increase community access to health care while providing authentic clinical experiences for students. SLSs consistently demonstrate high client satisfaction; however, limited evaluation of the impact of this model on the client's clinical outcomes exists. Therefore the aim of this project was to evaluate the impact of a physiotherapy student-led community-based rehabilitation service.

Methods: The SLS operated 4 days a week over a 15-week period. Forty-two community-dwelling clients (mean age 74 years) with a neurological diagnosis were included. During initial consultation, participants completed basic demographics, up to 3 Patient-Specific Functional Scales (PSFSs) and a QoL questionnaire (World Health Organization Quality of Life-Brief Questionnaire [WHOQOL-BREF]). At discharge, participants completed the WHOQOL-BREF, PSFS, and a patient experience survey. Risk event data were also collected.

Results: Over half of the PSFS items targeted mobility (55%). There was a significant improvement (P < 0.05) in median change (quartiles) for pre-/post-PSFS scores for clients whose primary condition was balance 1.0 (0.0-3.0), cerebrovascular accident 1.0 (2.0-3.0) or multiple Sclerosis 1.0 (1.0-2.0), and mean (SD) WHOQOL-BREF scores for Physical Health (12.2 ± 1.5 to 13.1 ± 1.3) and Social Relationships (12.7 ± 2.7 to 16.6 ± 3.3). Patient experience survey results indicated that clients had confidence and trust in students. No adverse events were reported.

Discussion and conclusions: The SLS model provides a strategy to increase access to health care and clinical placement capacity. Findings demonstrated improved self-rated function, QoL, and positive patient experience for community-dwelling clients with nonacute neurological diagnoses.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A380).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估区域学生主导的物理治疗诊所模式对改善社区居住的神经系统诊断成人自我报告功能的影响。
背景与目的:神经系统疾病是影响功能和生活质量的主要疾病。尽管有这种负担,社区服务却不成比例地稀缺。学生主导的物理治疗服务(SLSs)是一种模式,可以增加社区获得医疗保健的机会,同时为学生提供真实的临床体验。sls始终表现出较高的客户满意度;然而,该模型对客户临床结果的影响评估有限。因此,本项目的目的是评估物理治疗学生主导的社区康复服务的影响。方法:SLS术每周4天,连续15周。纳入了42名神经学诊断的社区居住患者(平均年龄74岁)。在初步咨询期间,参与者完成了基本人口统计、多达3份患者特异性功能量表(psfs)和一份生活质量问卷(世界卫生组织生命质量问卷[WHOQOL-BREF])。出院时,参与者完成WHOQOL-BREF、PSFS和患者体验调查。风险事件数据也被收集。结果:超过一半的PSFS项目针对流动性(55%)。原发性疾病为平衡1.0(0.0-3.0)、脑血管意外1.0(2.0-3.0)或多发性硬化症1.0(1.0-2.0)的患者psfs前后评分的中位数变化(四分位数)和WHOQOL-BREF身体健康评分(12.2±1.5至13.1±1.3)和社会关系评分(12.7±2.7至16.6±3.3)的平均值(SD)均有显著改善(P < 0.05)。患者体验调查结果显示,来访者对学生有信心和信任。无不良事件报告。讨论和结论:SLS模型提供了一种增加获得医疗保健和临床安置能力的战略。研究结果表明,非急性神经学诊断的社区居住患者的自评功能、生活质量和积极的患者体验得到改善。视频摘要可获得作者的更多见解(参见视频,补充数字内容1,可在:http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A380)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy
Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy (JNPT) is an indexed resource for dissemination of research-based evidence related to neurologic physical therapy intervention. High standards of quality are maintained through a rigorous, double-blinded, peer-review process and adherence to standards recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. With an international editorial board made up of preeminent researchers and clinicians, JNPT publishes articles of global relevance for examination, evaluation, prognosis, intervention, and outcomes for individuals with movement deficits due to neurologic conditions. Through systematic reviews, research articles, case studies, and clinical perspectives, JNPT promotes the integration of evidence into theory, education, research, and practice of neurologic physical therapy, spanning the continuum from pathophysiology to societal participation.
期刊最新文献
International Neurological Physical Therapy Association: Best Abstracts. Improving Executive Function and Dual-Task Cost in Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Role of the Cervical Spine in Dizziness. Motor and Non-Motor Factors of Concern About Falling and Fear of Falling in Multiple Sclerosis. Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: Characterizing Responders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1