Comparison of Color Fundus Photography and Multicolor Fundus Imaging for Detection of Lesions in Diabetic Retinopathy and Retinal Vein Occlusion.

IF 1.8 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Clinical ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S414603
Catarina Castro, João Heitor Marques, Nisa Silva, Ana Carolina Abreu, Maria João Furtado, Miguel Lume
{"title":"Comparison of Color Fundus Photography and Multicolor Fundus Imaging for Detection of Lesions in Diabetic Retinopathy and Retinal Vein Occlusion.","authors":"Catarina Castro,&nbsp;João Heitor Marques,&nbsp;Nisa Silva,&nbsp;Ana Carolina Abreu,&nbsp;Maria João Furtado,&nbsp;Miguel Lume","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S414603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the agreement between conventional fundus photography (CFP) and multicolor fundus imaging (MFI) for the detection of lesions of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis of eyes with DR or RVO who underwent CFP and MFI. All images were independently analyzed by two observers (O1 and O2), and the evaluated lesions were classified as \"present\" or \"absent\". Then, a paired comparison between both exams of the same eye was performed, to assess which made it easier to detect the lesions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Considering DR, the agreement was substantial for cotton wool spots and photocoagulation scars for both observers (O1: <i>κ</i>=0.75 and <i>κ</i>=0.67; O2: <i>κ</i>=0.71 and <i>κ</i>=0.64, respectively) and for hard exudates for O1 (<i>κ</i>=0.80). These lesions were detected more frequently on MFI. Regarding RVO, the agreement was considered substantial for venous sheathing by O1 (<i>κ</i>=0.64) and moderate for optociliary shunts by O2 (<i>κ</i>=0.60). Optociliary shunts were detected more frequently in CPF by both observers and venous sheathing on MFI by O1. For microaneurysms, retinal hemorrhages, retinal neovascularization, and proliferative membranes, in DR, and retinal hemorrhages, venous engorgement, and retinal neovascularization in RVO, the agreement was almost perfect (<i>κ</i>>0.82). In the paired analysis, both observers considered that, in DR, microaneurysms and retinal hemorrhages were easier to detect on CFP and that retinal neovascularization, cotton wool spots, and photocoagulation scars were easier to identify on MFI. Regarding RVO, optocilliary shunts were easier to identify on CFP and venous engorgement on MFI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The agreement of MFI and CFP was substantial to almost perfect for most lesions. MFI seems better to detect cotton wool spots and photocoagulations scars in DR and venous sheathing in RVO. Optocilliary shunts seem easier to detect on CFP.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"2515-2524"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/3e/opth-17-2515.PMC10460587.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S414603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the agreement between conventional fundus photography (CFP) and multicolor fundus imaging (MFI) for the detection of lesions of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of eyes with DR or RVO who underwent CFP and MFI. All images were independently analyzed by two observers (O1 and O2), and the evaluated lesions were classified as "present" or "absent". Then, a paired comparison between both exams of the same eye was performed, to assess which made it easier to detect the lesions.

Results: Considering DR, the agreement was substantial for cotton wool spots and photocoagulation scars for both observers (O1: κ=0.75 and κ=0.67; O2: κ=0.71 and κ=0.64, respectively) and for hard exudates for O1 (κ=0.80). These lesions were detected more frequently on MFI. Regarding RVO, the agreement was considered substantial for venous sheathing by O1 (κ=0.64) and moderate for optociliary shunts by O2 (κ=0.60). Optociliary shunts were detected more frequently in CPF by both observers and venous sheathing on MFI by O1. For microaneurysms, retinal hemorrhages, retinal neovascularization, and proliferative membranes, in DR, and retinal hemorrhages, venous engorgement, and retinal neovascularization in RVO, the agreement was almost perfect (κ>0.82). In the paired analysis, both observers considered that, in DR, microaneurysms and retinal hemorrhages were easier to detect on CFP and that retinal neovascularization, cotton wool spots, and photocoagulation scars were easier to identify on MFI. Regarding RVO, optocilliary shunts were easier to identify on CFP and venous engorgement on MFI.

Conclusion: The agreement of MFI and CFP was substantial to almost perfect for most lesions. MFI seems better to detect cotton wool spots and photocoagulations scars in DR and venous sheathing in RVO. Optocilliary shunts seem easier to detect on CFP.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
彩色眼底摄影与彩色眼底成像对糖尿病视网膜病变及视网膜静脉阻塞病变检测的比较。
目的:评价常规眼底摄影(CFP)与多色眼底成像(MFI)在糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)和视网膜静脉闭塞(RVO)病变检测中的一致性。方法:对行CFP和MFI的DR或RVO眼进行横断面分析。所有图像由两位观察者(O1和O2)独立分析,并将评估的病变分类为“存在”或“不存在”。然后,对同一只眼睛的两种检查进行配对比较,以评估哪种检查更容易发现病变。结果:考虑DR,观察双方对棉絮斑和光凝疤痕的一致性是显著的(O1: κ=0.75和κ=0.67;O2: κ=0.71, κ=0.64),硬渗出物为O1 (κ=0.80)。MFI更常发现这些病变。在RVO方面,O1对静脉鞘的一致性是显著的(κ=0.64), O2对光睫状体分流的一致性是中等的(κ=0.60)。光睫状体分流在CPF中被观察者和MFI静脉鞘检测的频率更高。对于微动脉瘤、视网膜出血、视网膜新生血管和增殖膜,DR和RVO的视网膜出血、静脉充血和视网膜新生血管,两者的一致性几乎是完美的(κ>0.82)。在配对分析中,两位观察者都认为在DR中,CFP上更容易发现微动脉瘤和视网膜出血,而MFI上更容易发现视网膜新生血管、棉絮斑和光凝疤痕。对于RVO, CFP更容易识别光睫状体分流,MFI更容易识别静脉充血。结论:MFI和CFP在大多数病变中基本一致,几乎完全一致。MFI似乎可以更好地检测DR中的棉絮斑点和光凝疤痕和RVO中的静脉鞘。光睫状体分流似乎更容易在CFP上发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical ophthalmology
Clinical ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
499
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Optimal Duration of Monocular Occlusion to Eliminate Fusion Effect in Intermittent Exotropia Time Savings Using a Digital Workflow versus a Conventional for Intraocular Lens Implantation in a Corporate Chain Hospital Setting The Prevalence and Severity of Acquired Blepharoptosis in US Eye Care Clinic Patients and Their Receptivity to Treatment Fungal Keratitis: Diagnosis, Management, and Recent Advances Evaluation of Foveal Avascular Zone After Strabismic and Anisometropic Amblyopia Therapy in Saudi Children Using Optic Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1