{"title":"Cognitive carbohydrate restriction: a new proposal for the diet mentality in the era of low-carb diets.","authors":"Jônatas de Oliveira","doi":"10.1590/1806-9282.20230601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, Low-carb diets have been considered again for weight loss in trials, and their spread goes hand in hand with the increase in unsupervised practices, as seen in intermittent fasting strategies1. Even if the results of controlled studies indicate more consistent results, the discussions also reach the lay public, who will make food choices, considering information dissipated on the Internet and by health professionals2. Feinman et al. evaluated an online support forum with 86,000 members discussing lowcarb, “Active Low-Carber Forums3,” and recently investigated this practice among university students in Brazil. In 2018, 25% of students practiced low-carb4. However, analyses of this behavioral profile and how food choices are made still lack appropriate methodologies to understand the low-carb phenomenon. Considering all the information and the various types of low-carb diets1, how do these people plan their eating behaviors to ensure this restriction? In other words, eating attitudes (i.e., thoughts, beliefs, and feelings), specifically about the food source of this macronutrient, are elements of choice that determine consumption. Considering this problem, we adapted the cognitive restriction subscale of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire, which assesses how willing, in terms of thoughts and behaviors, individuals are to restrict food in order to change shape and body weight5. The change was to identify this carbohydrate-directed diet mindset6. An example is question #3, “I do not eat some foods because they make me fat,” which was adapted to “I do not eat some foods (source of carbohydrates) because they make me fat.” Low-carb dieters showed more remarkable cognitive restraint and more significant cognitive restriction of carbohydrates compared to non-dieters. Nevertheless, the overall score for cognitive restraint on carbohydrates correlated positively with guilt for food cravings in low-carb dieters7. These findings indicate that unsupervised and popularly advertised diets will not always be aligned with healthy eating behavior, requiring further studies regarding diet mentality and other ways of thinking about food from an attitudinal point of view, which can be worked on in psychoeducational proposals and treatment programs.","PeriodicalId":21234,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira","volume":"69 8","pages":"e20230601"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/86/f9/1806-9282-ramb-69-08-e20230601.PMC10427171.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20230601","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dear Editor, Low-carb diets have been considered again for weight loss in trials, and their spread goes hand in hand with the increase in unsupervised practices, as seen in intermittent fasting strategies1. Even if the results of controlled studies indicate more consistent results, the discussions also reach the lay public, who will make food choices, considering information dissipated on the Internet and by health professionals2. Feinman et al. evaluated an online support forum with 86,000 members discussing lowcarb, “Active Low-Carber Forums3,” and recently investigated this practice among university students in Brazil. In 2018, 25% of students practiced low-carb4. However, analyses of this behavioral profile and how food choices are made still lack appropriate methodologies to understand the low-carb phenomenon. Considering all the information and the various types of low-carb diets1, how do these people plan their eating behaviors to ensure this restriction? In other words, eating attitudes (i.e., thoughts, beliefs, and feelings), specifically about the food source of this macronutrient, are elements of choice that determine consumption. Considering this problem, we adapted the cognitive restriction subscale of the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire, which assesses how willing, in terms of thoughts and behaviors, individuals are to restrict food in order to change shape and body weight5. The change was to identify this carbohydrate-directed diet mindset6. An example is question #3, “I do not eat some foods because they make me fat,” which was adapted to “I do not eat some foods (source of carbohydrates) because they make me fat.” Low-carb dieters showed more remarkable cognitive restraint and more significant cognitive restriction of carbohydrates compared to non-dieters. Nevertheless, the overall score for cognitive restraint on carbohydrates correlated positively with guilt for food cravings in low-carb dieters7. These findings indicate that unsupervised and popularly advertised diets will not always be aligned with healthy eating behavior, requiring further studies regarding diet mentality and other ways of thinking about food from an attitudinal point of view, which can be worked on in psychoeducational proposals and treatment programs.
期刊介绍:
A Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (RAMB), editada pela Associação Médica Brasileira, desde 1954, tem por objetivo publicar artigos que contribuam para o conhecimento médico.