SARS-Co-V-2 positive status is associated with a more seriously injured population of trauma patients but not independently associated with worse outcomes of trauma care.

Bryan G Maxwell, Andrea Greenlaw, Jeffrey Mako, Megan R Lundeberg
{"title":"SARS-Co-V-2 positive status is associated with a more seriously injured population of trauma patients but not independently associated with worse outcomes of trauma care.","authors":"Bryan G Maxwell, Andrea Greenlaw, Jeffrey Mako, Megan R Lundeberg","doi":"10.5249/jivr.v15i2.1818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 positive status has been considered a predominantly incidental finding among trauma patients. We sought to examine whether concurrent infection is associated with worse outcomes in a contemporary cohort of injured patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis of a level I trauma center's institutional registry from May 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. The prevalence of COVID in the trauma population was compared monthly using prevalence ratios relative to population estimates. Unadjusted cohorts of COVID+ vs COVID- trauma patients were compared. COVID+ patients then were matched on age, mechanism of injury, year, and injury severity score (ISS) with COVID- controls for adjusted analysis with a primary composite outcome of mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of n=2,783 trauma activations, n=51 (1.8%) were COVID+. Compared to the general population, the trauma population had prevalence ratios for COVID of 5.3 to 79.7 (median=20.8). Compared to COVID- patients, COVID+ patients had worse outcomes, including a higher proportion who were admitted to the ICU, required intubation, underwent a major operation, and had greater total charges and a longer length of stay. However, these differences appeared related to more severe injury patterns in the COVID+ cohort. In the adjusted analysis, no significant differences between groups in any of the outcome variables were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Worse trauma outcomes in COVID+ patients appear to be correlated to the more substantial patterns of injury observed in this group. Trauma patients have substantially higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 positivity than the local population at large. These results reinforce that this population is vulnerable to multiple threats. They will guide the ongoing delivery of care in shaping the needs for testing, PPE for those delivering care, and the capacity and operational needs of trauma systems that must care for a population with such high rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":73795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of injury & violence research","volume":"15 2","pages":"129-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10915877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of injury & violence research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v15i2.1818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: SARS-CoV-2 positive status has been considered a predominantly incidental finding among trauma patients. We sought to examine whether concurrent infection is associated with worse outcomes in a contemporary cohort of injured patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of a level I trauma center's institutional registry from May 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. The prevalence of COVID in the trauma population was compared monthly using prevalence ratios relative to population estimates. Unadjusted cohorts of COVID+ vs COVID- trauma patients were compared. COVID+ patients then were matched on age, mechanism of injury, year, and injury severity score (ISS) with COVID- controls for adjusted analysis with a primary composite outcome of mortality.

Results: Out of n=2,783 trauma activations, n=51 (1.8%) were COVID+. Compared to the general population, the trauma population had prevalence ratios for COVID of 5.3 to 79.7 (median=20.8). Compared to COVID- patients, COVID+ patients had worse outcomes, including a higher proportion who were admitted to the ICU, required intubation, underwent a major operation, and had greater total charges and a longer length of stay. However, these differences appeared related to more severe injury patterns in the COVID+ cohort. In the adjusted analysis, no significant differences between groups in any of the outcome variables were observed.

Conclusions: Worse trauma outcomes in COVID+ patients appear to be correlated to the more substantial patterns of injury observed in this group. Trauma patients have substantially higher rates of SARS-CoV-2 positivity than the local population at large. These results reinforce that this population is vulnerable to multiple threats. They will guide the ongoing delivery of care in shaping the needs for testing, PPE for those delivering care, and the capacity and operational needs of trauma systems that must care for a population with such high rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARS-Co-V-2 阳性与创伤病人中受伤较重的人群有关,但与创伤护理结果较差无关。
背景:SARS-CoV-2 阳性一直被认为是创伤患者的偶然发现。我们试图研究在 COVID-19 大流行期间,并发感染是否与当代受伤患者队列中更差的预后相关:方法:对一家一级创伤中心从 2020 年 5 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日的机构登记进行回顾性队列分析。采用相对于人口估计值的流行率比对创伤人群中 COVID 的流行率进行月度比较。比较未经调整的 COVID+ 与 COVID- 外伤患者队列。然后,根据年龄、受伤机制、年份和受伤严重程度评分(ISS)将COVID+患者与COVID-对照组进行配对,以死亡率为主要综合结果进行调整分析:在 2,783 名外伤患者中,有 51 人(1.8%)为 COVID+。与普通人群相比,外伤人群的 COVID 患病率为 5.3 至 79.7(中位数=20.8)。与 COVID- 患者相比,COVID+ 患者的预后较差,包括入住重症监护室、需要插管、接受大型手术的比例较高,总费用较高,住院时间较长。不过,这些差异似乎与COVID+队列中更严重的损伤模式有关。在调整后的分析中,没有观察到任何结果变量在组间存在显著差异:结论:COVID+患者较差的创伤预后似乎与该组中观察到的更严重的损伤模式有关。外伤患者的 SARS-CoV-2 阳性率远高于当地一般人群。这些结果进一步说明,这一人群很容易受到多种威胁。这些结果将指导正在进行的护理工作,以确定检测需求、护理人员的个人防护设备,以及必须护理 SARS-CoV-2 感染率如此之高的人群的创伤系统的能力和运行需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating the impact of Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) on Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety symptoms in female victims of domestic violence. The magnitude of parental physical harms: a descriptive report of 76 abusive children in Isfahan. Deaths and clashes induced by rivalry among fans during FIFA World Cup 2022 in Bangladesh. Factors affecting the spiritual rehabilitation of people affected by natural disasters: a systematic review. US States with poor social health outcomes and more firearms have more morbidity due to mass shootings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1