{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients: Safety, Efficacy, and Cost Evaluation.","authors":"Chengfang Wang, Zhijiang Wang, Weilin Wang","doi":"10.12659/MSM.940176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND The use of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in elderly patients has sparked debate due to concerns about its safety. This study evaluates its safety and efficacy for elderly patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 250 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy between January 2015 and April 2022. Group A consisted of 100 non-elderly patients (under 70) who had laparoscopic procedures; Group B had 60 elderly patients (70 and above) with laparoscopic surgeries; and Group C included 90 elderly patients with open surgeries. Clinical outcomes were then compared across the groups. RESULTS Elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy experienced a higher conversion rate (35% vs 19%), increased ICU admissions post-operation (45% vs 23%), a prolonged ICU stay, greater hospital expenses (¥118,782.48 vs ¥106,698.38), and a lower post-operative adjuvant therapy rate (31.91% vs 69.23%). However, they had fewer B-C pancreatic fistulas (5% vs 24%). Compared to open surgery in elderly patients, laparoscopic procedure showed benefits such as reduced blood loss (median of 200 ml) and fewer wound infections (3.33% vs 17.78%). On the downside, laparoscopy had a longer operation time (462.5 minutes vs 315 minutes), took longer before patients could resume oral intake (median of 5.5 days vs 5 days), and incurred higher hospitalization costs (¥118,782.48 vs ¥111,541.60). CONCLUSIONS While laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in elderly patients may not match the outcomes seen in younger patients, it doesn't possess marked drawbacks when compared to open surgery. It is a safe and viable option for the elderly.</p>","PeriodicalId":18276,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research","volume":"29 ","pages":"e940176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/fb/medscimonit-29-e940176.PMC10462378.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.940176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in elderly patients has sparked debate due to concerns about its safety. This study evaluates its safety and efficacy for elderly patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 250 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy between January 2015 and April 2022. Group A consisted of 100 non-elderly patients (under 70) who had laparoscopic procedures; Group B had 60 elderly patients (70 and above) with laparoscopic surgeries; and Group C included 90 elderly patients with open surgeries. Clinical outcomes were then compared across the groups. RESULTS Elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy experienced a higher conversion rate (35% vs 19%), increased ICU admissions post-operation (45% vs 23%), a prolonged ICU stay, greater hospital expenses (¥118,782.48 vs ¥106,698.38), and a lower post-operative adjuvant therapy rate (31.91% vs 69.23%). However, they had fewer B-C pancreatic fistulas (5% vs 24%). Compared to open surgery in elderly patients, laparoscopic procedure showed benefits such as reduced blood loss (median of 200 ml) and fewer wound infections (3.33% vs 17.78%). On the downside, laparoscopy had a longer operation time (462.5 minutes vs 315 minutes), took longer before patients could resume oral intake (median of 5.5 days vs 5 days), and incurred higher hospitalization costs (¥118,782.48 vs ¥111,541.60). CONCLUSIONS While laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in elderly patients may not match the outcomes seen in younger patients, it doesn't possess marked drawbacks when compared to open surgery. It is a safe and viable option for the elderly.
背景腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术在老年患者中的应用由于其安全性引起了争论。本研究评价其对老年患者的安全性和有效性。材料和方法我们回顾性分析了2015年1月至2022年4月期间接受胰十二指肠切除术的250例患者的数据。A组包括100名接受腹腔镜手术的非老年患者(70岁以下);B组70岁及以上老年腹腔镜手术患者60例;C组为90例老年开放性手术患者。然后比较各组的临床结果。结果老年腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术患者转换率较高(35% vs 19%),术后ICU入院率较高(45% vs 23%),住院时间较长(118,782.48元vs 106,698.38元),术后辅助治疗率较低(31.91% vs 69.23%)。然而,他们有较少的B-C胰瘘(5%对24%)。与老年患者的开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术显示出诸如减少失血量(中位数为200 ml)和减少伤口感染(3.33% vs 17.78%)等益处。缺点是腹腔镜手术时间较长(462.5分钟vs 315分钟),患者恢复口服所需时间较长(中位数为5.5天vs 5天),住院费用较高(118,782.48元vs 111,541.60元)。结论:虽然老年患者的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术可能与年轻患者的结果不一致,但与开放手术相比,它没有明显的缺点。对于老年人来说,这是一种安全可行的选择。