The Essence of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, 2021: 4. Surgical Treatment.

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2023-07-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2022-0209
Gen Inoue
{"title":"The Essence of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis, 2021: 4. Surgical Treatment.","authors":"Gen Inoue","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2022-0209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"・Surgical procedures should be selected with patient consent based on comprehensive evaluations, including short-term and long-term clinical outcomes, risk of complications, and cost-effectiveness. Surgical treatment is indicated when conservative treatments are less effective or severe neurological symptoms in the cauda equina, such as bladder and bowel dysfunction, are noted. ・Several reports have indicated that decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) produces better clinical outcomes than conservative treatment. It is suggested to perform decompression for patients with LSS without spinal segmental instability diagnosed by physical findings and imaging, in whom conservative treatment is ineffective. ・While decompression with fusion is useful for patients with spinal instability and the improvement of Quality of Life (QOL)/Activities of Daily Living (ADL) is expected, the cost is higher than that of decompression alone, and the return-to-work rate is slightly poorer. The rates of complications and reoperation are also higher than those of decompression alone. So, fully considering pathological conditions and surgical procedures to examine indications is necessary, such as instability and the need for long-segment fusion. ・The bone union state may affect clinical outcomes, but a clear recommendation cannot currently be presented. ・It is suggested to use local bone and to combine the use of artificial bone, demineralized bone matrix, and allogenic bone as the bone graft material for spinal fusion. ・A clear recommendation cannot be made as to whether surgical treatment using Interspinous Process Devices (IPDs) or dynamic stabilization using pedicle screws is more useful than conservative treatment, decompression, or fusion surgery for LSS. ・For patients with LSS, minimally invasive spine surgery may be more useful for preventing the occurrence of iatrogenic instability, alleviating low back pain, and reducing the bleeding volume than conventional surgery, and it is suggested to perform it. ・Even in the very elderly aged 80 years (octagenarian and over), surgical treatment for LSS improves their clinical symptoms.","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/06/2432-261X-7-0308.PMC10447186.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2022-0209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

・Surgical procedures should be selected with patient consent based on comprehensive evaluations, including short-term and long-term clinical outcomes, risk of complications, and cost-effectiveness. Surgical treatment is indicated when conservative treatments are less effective or severe neurological symptoms in the cauda equina, such as bladder and bowel dysfunction, are noted. ・Several reports have indicated that decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) produces better clinical outcomes than conservative treatment. It is suggested to perform decompression for patients with LSS without spinal segmental instability diagnosed by physical findings and imaging, in whom conservative treatment is ineffective. ・While decompression with fusion is useful for patients with spinal instability and the improvement of Quality of Life (QOL)/Activities of Daily Living (ADL) is expected, the cost is higher than that of decompression alone, and the return-to-work rate is slightly poorer. The rates of complications and reoperation are also higher than those of decompression alone. So, fully considering pathological conditions and surgical procedures to examine indications is necessary, such as instability and the need for long-segment fusion. ・The bone union state may affect clinical outcomes, but a clear recommendation cannot currently be presented. ・It is suggested to use local bone and to combine the use of artificial bone, demineralized bone matrix, and allogenic bone as the bone graft material for spinal fusion. ・A clear recommendation cannot be made as to whether surgical treatment using Interspinous Process Devices (IPDs) or dynamic stabilization using pedicle screws is more useful than conservative treatment, decompression, or fusion surgery for LSS. ・For patients with LSS, minimally invasive spine surgery may be more useful for preventing the occurrence of iatrogenic instability, alleviating low back pain, and reducing the bleeding volume than conventional surgery, and it is suggested to perform it. ・Even in the very elderly aged 80 years (octagenarian and over), surgical treatment for LSS improves their clinical symptoms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰椎管狭窄症临床实践指南要点,2021:4。外科处置
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor Concerning "Clinical Outcomes of Condoliase Injection Therapy for Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation" by Kagami et al. Reply to "Letter to the Editor Concerning 'Clinical Outcomes of Condoliase Injection Therapy for Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation' by Kagami et al." Animal Model for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Literature Review. Increase in Intraoperative Intraocular Pressure in the Prone Position. Indication and Limitation of Intradiscal Condoliase Injection for Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1