Clinical Outcomes of Condoliase Injection Therapy for Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation.

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2023-07-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2022-0189
Yujiro Kagami, Hiroaki Nakashima, Naoki Segi, Ryuichi Shinjo, Shiro Imagama
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Condoliase Injection Therapy for Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation.","authors":"Yujiro Kagami,&nbsp;Hiroaki Nakashima,&nbsp;Naoki Segi,&nbsp;Ryuichi Shinjo,&nbsp;Shiro Imagama","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2022-0189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of condoliase injection therapy (CIT) for lateral lumbar disc herniation (LLDH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 157 of 180 enrolled patients (70 males, 87 females; mean age: 52.6±16.9 years). These patients were divided into two groups (group L: LLDH, group M: medial LDH [subligamentous and transligamentous]). From baseline to 1 year after injection (final follow-up), leg pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring for CIT's clinical efficacy of CIT. Radiography and magnetic resonance imaging conducted before and 3 months after the injection were assessed. Patients with a VAS improvement of ≥50% at the final follow-up were defined as responders. The responder and nonresponder LLDH groups were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Groups L and M showed comparable responder rates (75.0% and 77.4%, respectively) (<i>P</i>=0.80). VAS and JOA scores at 1 year showed no significant differences between the groups (<i>P</i>=0.82 and 0.80, respectively). VAS score at 1 month after injection reduced considerably in the responder group compared with that in the nonresponder group (19.7 vs. 66.0, <i>P</i><0.01) and continued to decrease at the last follow-up (3.5 vs. 52.0, <i>P</i><0.001). Nonresponders had significantly lower disc heights after 3 months. However, intervertebral instability, alignment, and disc degeneration did not differ between the responders and nonresponders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The response rate of CIT for LLDH was comparable to that for medial LDH. Therefore, CIT is an effective treatment for LLDH.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3e/24/2432-261X-7-0363.PMC10447184.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2022-0189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of condoliase injection therapy (CIT) for lateral lumbar disc herniation (LLDH).

Methods: This retrospective study included 157 of 180 enrolled patients (70 males, 87 females; mean age: 52.6±16.9 years). These patients were divided into two groups (group L: LLDH, group M: medial LDH [subligamentous and transligamentous]). From baseline to 1 year after injection (final follow-up), leg pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring for CIT's clinical efficacy of CIT. Radiography and magnetic resonance imaging conducted before and 3 months after the injection were assessed. Patients with a VAS improvement of ≥50% at the final follow-up were defined as responders. The responder and nonresponder LLDH groups were also compared.

Results: Groups L and M showed comparable responder rates (75.0% and 77.4%, respectively) (P=0.80). VAS and JOA scores at 1 year showed no significant differences between the groups (P=0.82 and 0.80, respectively). VAS score at 1 month after injection reduced considerably in the responder group compared with that in the nonresponder group (19.7 vs. 66.0, P<0.01) and continued to decrease at the last follow-up (3.5 vs. 52.0, P<0.001). Nonresponders had significantly lower disc heights after 3 months. However, intervertebral instability, alignment, and disc degeneration did not differ between the responders and nonresponders.

Conclusions: The response rate of CIT for LLDH was comparable to that for medial LDH. Therefore, CIT is an effective treatment for LLDH.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吊顶酶注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效。
简介:本研究旨在评价吊顶酶注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LLDH)的疗效。方法:本回顾性研究纳入180例入组患者中的157例(男性70例,女性87例;平均年龄:52.6±16.9岁)。将患者分为两组(L组:LLDH, M组:内侧LDH[韧带下和韧带外])。从基线至注射后1年(最后随访),采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和日本骨科协会(JOA) CIT评分评估CIT的临床疗效,并评估注射前和注射后3个月的x线片和磁共振成像。在最终随访时VAS改善≥50%的患者被定义为应答者。还比较了有反应和无反应的LLDH组。结果:L组和M组有效率相当(分别为75.0%和77.4%)(P=0.80)。1年VAS和JOA评分组间差异无统计学意义(P值分别为0.82和0.80)。与无反应组相比,反应组注射后1个月VAS评分明显降低(19.7比66.0,ppp)。结论:CIT治疗LLDH的有效率与内侧LDH相当。因此,CIT是治疗LLDH的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Posterior Column Reconstruction of the Lumbar Spine Using En Bloc Resected Vertebral Arch in Spinal Tumor and Deformity Surgeries. Sclerotherapy for Aggressive Vertebral Hemangioma with Severe Bone Destruction: A 5-Year Analysis. Surgical Treatment for Cervical Lamina Metastasis from Parathyroid Carcinoma: A Case Report. Low Nutrition before Injury Is a Risk Factor for Dysphagia in Older Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Based on a Multicenter Data of 707 Patients. Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire for Patients with Lumbar Spine Disease Undergoing Posterior Surgery by Generation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1