Depression, physical activity, and incident cardiovascular disease among American Indians: The strong heart family study

Torrie Eagle Staff , Marcia O'Leary , Amanda M. Fretts
{"title":"Depression, physical activity, and incident cardiovascular disease among American Indians: The strong heart family study","authors":"Torrie Eagle Staff ,&nbsp;Marcia O'Leary ,&nbsp;Amanda M. Fretts","doi":"10.1016/j.psycom.2023.100125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Little is known about the relationship of depression with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) among American Indians (AIs), a population with a high burden of depressive symptoms and CVD. In this study, we examined the association of depressive symptoms with CVD risk among AIs and assessed whether an objective marker of ambulatory activity influenced the relationship.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study comprised participants from the Strong Heart Family Study, a longitudinal study of CVD risk among AIs free of CVD at baseline (2001–2003) and who participated in a follow-up examination (n ​= ​2209). The Center for Epidemiologic Studies of Depression Scale (CES-D) was used to assess depressive symptoms and depressive affect. Ambulatory activity was measured using Accusplit AE120 pedometers. Incident CVD was defined as new myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease, or stroke (through 2017). Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the association of depressive symptoms with incident CVD.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>27.5% of participants reported moderate or severe depressive symptoms at baseline and 262 participants developed CVD during follow-up. Compared to participants who reported no depressive symptoms, the odds ratios for developing CVD among those who reported mild, moderate, or severe symptoms were: 1.19 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.85), 1.61 (95% CI: 1.09, 2.37), and 1.71 (95% CI: 1.01, 2.91), respectively. Adjustment for activity did not alter findings.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>CES-D is a tool used to identify individuals with depressive symptoms and not a measure of clinical depression.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Higher levels of reported depressive symptoms were positively associated with CVD risk in a large cohort of AIs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74595,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry research communications","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5e/8d/nihms-1906460.PMC10312118.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598723000247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the relationship of depression with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) among American Indians (AIs), a population with a high burden of depressive symptoms and CVD. In this study, we examined the association of depressive symptoms with CVD risk among AIs and assessed whether an objective marker of ambulatory activity influenced the relationship.

Methods

The study comprised participants from the Strong Heart Family Study, a longitudinal study of CVD risk among AIs free of CVD at baseline (2001–2003) and who participated in a follow-up examination (n ​= ​2209). The Center for Epidemiologic Studies of Depression Scale (CES-D) was used to assess depressive symptoms and depressive affect. Ambulatory activity was measured using Accusplit AE120 pedometers. Incident CVD was defined as new myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease, or stroke (through 2017). Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the association of depressive symptoms with incident CVD.

Results

27.5% of participants reported moderate or severe depressive symptoms at baseline and 262 participants developed CVD during follow-up. Compared to participants who reported no depressive symptoms, the odds ratios for developing CVD among those who reported mild, moderate, or severe symptoms were: 1.19 (95% CI: 0.76, 1.85), 1.61 (95% CI: 1.09, 2.37), and 1.71 (95% CI: 1.01, 2.91), respectively. Adjustment for activity did not alter findings.

Limitations

CES-D is a tool used to identify individuals with depressive symptoms and not a measure of clinical depression.

Conclusion

Higher levels of reported depressive symptoms were positively associated with CVD risk in a large cohort of AIs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国印第安人的抑郁、体育活动和心血管疾病:强心脏家族研究
背景在美国印第安人(AI)中,抑郁症与心血管疾病(CVD)的关系知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们检查了AI中抑郁症状与CVD风险的关系,并评估了活动的客观标志物是否影响了这种关系。方法该研究包括来自强心家族研究的参与者,该研究是一项关于基线(2001-2003)无心血管疾病的人工智能心血管疾病风险的纵向研究,并参与了随访检查(n​=​2209)。抑郁流行病学研究中心量表(CES-D)用于评估抑郁症状和抑郁情绪。使用Accusplit AE120计步器测量活动。心血管疾病事件被定义为新的心肌梗死、冠心病或中风(至2017年)。结果27.5%的参与者在基线时报告了中度或重度抑郁症状,262名参与者在随访期间出现了心血管疾病。与未报告抑郁症状的参与者相比,报告轻度、中度或重度症状的参与者患心血管疾病的比值比分别为:1.19(95%CI:0.76,1.85)、1.61(95%CI:1.09,2.37)和1.71(95%CI:0.01,2.91)。活动调整并未改变调查结果。限制CES-D是一种用于识别有抑郁症状的个体的工具,而不是临床抑郁的衡量标准。结论在一个大型AI队列中,较高水平的抑郁症状与CVD风险呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry research communications
Psychiatry research communications Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
77 days
期刊最新文献
An investigation into the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and food addiction: The role of urgency and emotion dysregulation Factors related to painful somatic symptoms in patients with depression: The role of gender and anhedonia rtfMRI neurofeedback interventions are not cost prohibitive The impact of childhood sexual, physical and emotional abuse and neglect on suicidal behavior and non-suicidal self-injury: A systematic review of meta-analyses Convergent and predictive validity of the Mini MoCA and considerations for use among older adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1