The role of outgroup homogeneity and the neurodynamics of the frontal cortex during beauty comparisons.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Social Neuroscience Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-28 DOI:10.1080/17470919.2023.2242098
George Zacharopoulos, Katharina Ohmann, Niklas Ihssen, Gayannee Kedia, Thomas Mussweiler, David E J Linden
{"title":"The role of outgroup homogeneity and the neurodynamics of the frontal cortex during beauty comparisons.","authors":"George Zacharopoulos, Katharina Ohmann, Niklas Ihssen, Gayannee Kedia, Thomas Mussweiler, David E J Linden","doi":"10.1080/17470919.2023.2242098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The distance effect states that the closer two compared magnitudes (e.g., two numbers, physical attractiveness in two faces), the more difficult the comparison, and the greater the activity of the frontoparietal control network. However, it is unclear whether this network is also recruited to the same extent when we perform ingroup and outgroup beauty comparisons and whether the activation of these networks is tracked by interindividual variation in the perceptions we hold about an outgroup. We recorded brain activity with fMRI, where participants compared the beauty of two women ostensibly either from their ingroup or from an outgroup. Low-distance conditions produced longer response times than the high-distance conditions, and this was found in both the ingroup and outgroup conditions. However, our neuroimaging analyses revealed that the left IFG/anterior insula showed the classic distance effect only during ingroup processing but not during outgroup processing. Notably, interaction-specific activity within the left IFG/anterior insula was related to perceptions of outgroup homogeneity assessed via a questionnaire. This set of findings reveals the dynamic role of the prefrontal cortex and its interplay with perceptions of outgroup homogeneity in shaping ingroup and outgroup decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":49511,"journal":{"name":"Social Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"382-392"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2023.2242098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The distance effect states that the closer two compared magnitudes (e.g., two numbers, physical attractiveness in two faces), the more difficult the comparison, and the greater the activity of the frontoparietal control network. However, it is unclear whether this network is also recruited to the same extent when we perform ingroup and outgroup beauty comparisons and whether the activation of these networks is tracked by interindividual variation in the perceptions we hold about an outgroup. We recorded brain activity with fMRI, where participants compared the beauty of two women ostensibly either from their ingroup or from an outgroup. Low-distance conditions produced longer response times than the high-distance conditions, and this was found in both the ingroup and outgroup conditions. However, our neuroimaging analyses revealed that the left IFG/anterior insula showed the classic distance effect only during ingroup processing but not during outgroup processing. Notably, interaction-specific activity within the left IFG/anterior insula was related to perceptions of outgroup homogeneity assessed via a questionnaire. This set of findings reveals the dynamic role of the prefrontal cortex and its interplay with perceptions of outgroup homogeneity in shaping ingroup and outgroup decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外群体同质性的作用和额叶皮层在美比较中的神经动力学。
距离效应表明,两个比较量越接近(例如,两个数字,两张脸的外表吸引力),比较就越困难,额顶叶控制网络的活动也越大。然而,当我们进行群体内和群体外的美貌比较时,这个网络是否也被招募到同样的程度,以及这些网络的激活是否被我们对群体外的看法的个体间差异所追踪,这些都还不清楚。我们用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)记录了大脑活动,让参与者比较两名女性表面上的美,其中一名来自她们的内部群体,另一名来自外部群体。低距离条件比高距离条件产生更长的反应时间,这在内群体和外群体条件中都有发现。然而,我们的神经影像学分析显示,左侧IFG/前脑岛仅在群体内加工中表现出典型的距离效应,而在群体外加工中则没有。值得注意的是,左IFG/前岛内的互动特异性活动与通过问卷评估的外群体同质性的感知有关。这组研究结果揭示了前额叶皮层的动态作用及其与外群体同质性感知在形成内群体和外群体决策中的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Neuroscience
Social Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Neuroscience features original empirical Research Papers as well as targeted Reviews, Commentaries and Fast Track Brief Reports that examine how the brain mediates social behavior, social cognition, social interactions and relationships, group social dynamics, and related topics that deal with social/interpersonal psychology and neurobiology. Multi-paper symposia and special topic issues are organized and presented regularly as well. The goal of Social Neuroscience is to provide a place to publish empirical articles that intend to further our understanding of the neural mechanisms contributing to the development and maintenance of social behaviors, or to understanding how these mechanisms are disrupted in clinical disorders.
期刊最新文献
Social group size alters social behavior and dopaminergic and serotonergic systems. How does teaching experience impact brain processes underlying the theory of mind? Study on primary school educators. Embodied hyperscanning for studying social interaction: A scoping review of simultaneous brain and body measurements. Social and perceptual decisions predict differences in face inversion neural correlates: Implications for development and face perception methods. Exploring how first- and third-person narrative modulates neural activation during a social cognition task. An event-related potentials (ERPs) study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1