Combination Immune Checkpoint Blockade Regimens for Previously Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University Experience.

Dylan J Martini, T Anders Olsen, Subir Goyal, Yuan Liu, Sean T Evans, Emilie Elise Hitron, Greta Anne Russler, Lauren Yantorni, Sarah Caulfield, Jacqueline T Brown, Jamie M Goldman, Bassel Nazha, Bradley C Carthon, Wayne B Harris, Omer Kucuk, Viraj A Master, Mehmet Asim Bilen
{"title":"Combination Immune Checkpoint Blockade Regimens for Previously Untreated Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University Experience.","authors":"Dylan J Martini,&nbsp;T Anders Olsen,&nbsp;Subir Goyal,&nbsp;Yuan Liu,&nbsp;Sean T Evans,&nbsp;Emilie Elise Hitron,&nbsp;Greta Anne Russler,&nbsp;Lauren Yantorni,&nbsp;Sarah Caulfield,&nbsp;Jacqueline T Brown,&nbsp;Jamie M Goldman,&nbsp;Bassel Nazha,&nbsp;Bradley C Carthon,&nbsp;Wayne B Harris,&nbsp;Omer Kucuk,&nbsp;Viraj A Master,&nbsp;Mehmet Asim Bilen","doi":"10.36401/JIPO-22-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are three combination immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens in the first-line setting for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Currently, there is limited real-world data for clinical outcomes and toxicity in mRCC patients treated with first-line ICI-based regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of 49 mRCC patients treated with ICI-based combination regimens in the standard of care setting at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University from 2015-2020. We collected baseline data from the electronic medical record including demographic information and disease characteristics. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were collected from clinic notes and laboratory values. The primary clinical outcomes measured were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age was 65 years, and most patients (80%) were males. The majority were White (86%) and had clear cell RCC (83%). Most patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0 (43%) or 1 (45%). Approximately one-half (49%) had at least three sites of distant metastatic disease. Most patients (88%) received nivolumab and ipilimumab. More than one-half (53%) of patients experienced an irAE, with 13 (27%) patients having treatment delayed and 18% discontinuing treatment for toxicity. The median OS was not reached, and the median PFS was 8.0 months per a Kaplan-Meier estimation. More than half of patients (53%) had a PFS > 6 months, and 22% had PFS > 1 year. The ORR was 33% for the entire cohort, and 7% of patients had a complete response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We presented real-world efficacy and toxicity data for front-line ICI combination treatment regimens. The ORR and median PFS were lower in our cohort of patients compared to the available data in the clinical trial setting. This was likely because of more advanced disease in this study. Future studies should provide additional data that will allow comparisons between different ICI combination regimens for untreated mRCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":16081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology","volume":"5 3","pages":"52-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b1/d2/i2590-017X-5-3-52.PMC9390705.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunotherapy and Precision Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36401/JIPO-22-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: There are three combination immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens in the first-line setting for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Currently, there is limited real-world data for clinical outcomes and toxicity in mRCC patients treated with first-line ICI-based regimens.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 49 mRCC patients treated with ICI-based combination regimens in the standard of care setting at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University from 2015-2020. We collected baseline data from the electronic medical record including demographic information and disease characteristics. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were collected from clinic notes and laboratory values. The primary clinical outcomes measured were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR).

Results: The median age was 65 years, and most patients (80%) were males. The majority were White (86%) and had clear cell RCC (83%). Most patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0 (43%) or 1 (45%). Approximately one-half (49%) had at least three sites of distant metastatic disease. Most patients (88%) received nivolumab and ipilimumab. More than one-half (53%) of patients experienced an irAE, with 13 (27%) patients having treatment delayed and 18% discontinuing treatment for toxicity. The median OS was not reached, and the median PFS was 8.0 months per a Kaplan-Meier estimation. More than half of patients (53%) had a PFS > 6 months, and 22% had PFS > 1 year. The ORR was 33% for the entire cohort, and 7% of patients had a complete response.

Conclusion: We presented real-world efficacy and toxicity data for front-line ICI combination treatment regimens. The ORR and median PFS were lower in our cohort of patients compared to the available data in the clinical trial setting. This was likely because of more advanced disease in this study. Future studies should provide additional data that will allow comparisons between different ICI combination regimens for untreated mRCC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合免疫检查点阻断方案治疗先前未治疗的转移性肾细胞癌:埃默里大学Winship癌症研究所的经验。
在转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)的一线治疗中,有三种基于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的联合治疗方案。目前,mRCC患者接受一线ci方案治疗的临床结果和毒性的真实数据有限。方法:我们对2015-2020年在埃默里大学Winship癌症研究所标准护理环境中接受基于ci的联合方案治疗的49例mRCC患者进行了回顾性研究。我们从电子病历中收集基线数据,包括人口统计信息和疾病特征。从临床记录和实验室值中收集免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)。测量的主要临床结果是总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和客观缓解率(ORR)。结果:中位年龄65岁,男性居多(80%)。大多数为白色(86%)和透明细胞RCC(83%)。大多数患者的东部肿瘤合作组(ECOG)表现状态评分为0(43%)或1(45%)。大约一半(49%)的患者至少有三个部位的远处转移性疾病。大多数患者(88%)接受了纳武单抗和伊匹单抗。超过一半(53%)的患者经历了irAE, 13名(27%)患者治疗延迟,18%的患者因毒性而停止治疗。中位OS未达到,Kaplan-Meier估计中位PFS为8.0个月。超过一半的患者(53%)PFS > 6个月,22% PFS > 1年。整个队列的ORR为33%,7%的患者完全缓解。结论:我们提供了一线ICI联合治疗方案的真实疗效和毒性数据。与临床试验环境中的现有数据相比,我们的队列患者的ORR和中位PFS较低。这可能是因为本研究中出现了更严重的疾病。未来的研究应该提供更多的数据,以便对未治疗的mRCC的不同ICI联合治疗方案进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Lefitolimod in Combination with Ipilimumab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase I Trial. Safety and Efficacy of Toripalimab in Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma: An Open-Label, Phase 1 Study. Selinexor (KPT-330) in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Uveal Melanoma: A Phase 1B Trial. Expert Clinical Management of Inflammatory Immune-Related Arthritis in Patients with Cancer Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Usefulness of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Clinical Decision-Making in Oncology: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1