Efficacy of plasmapheresis in neutropenic patients suffering from cytokine storm because of severe COVID-19 infection.

IF 2.3 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Blood Research Pub Date : 2023-06-30 DOI:10.5045/br.2023.2022201
Alireza Sadeghi, Somayeh Sadeghi, Mohammad Saleh Peikar, Maryam Yazdi, Mehran Sharifi, Safie Ghafel, Farzin Khorvash, Behrooz Ataei, Mohammad Reza Safavi, Elahe Nasri
{"title":"Efficacy of plasmapheresis in neutropenic patients suffering from cytokine storm because of severe COVID-19 infection.","authors":"Alireza Sadeghi,&nbsp;Somayeh Sadeghi,&nbsp;Mohammad Saleh Peikar,&nbsp;Maryam Yazdi,&nbsp;Mehran Sharifi,&nbsp;Safie Ghafel,&nbsp;Farzin Khorvash,&nbsp;Behrooz Ataei,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Safavi,&nbsp;Elahe Nasri","doi":"10.5045/br.2023.2022201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and inability of healthcare systems to control the disease, various therapeutic theories with controversial responses have been proposed. Plasmapheresis was administered as a medication. However, the knowledge of its efficacy and indications is inadequate. This study evaluated the use of plasmapheresis in critically ill patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 86 patients with malignancies, including a control group (N=41) and an intervention group (N=45) with severe COVID-19 during 2020-21. Both groups were treated with routine medications for COVID-19 management according to national guidelines, and plasmapheresis was applied to the intervention group. C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, hemoglobin, and white blood cell, polymorphonuclear, lymphocyte, and platelet levels were measured at admission and at the end of plasmapheresis. Other variables included neutrophil recovery, intensive care unit admission, intubation requirements, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CR<i>P</i>(<i>P</i><0.001), D-dimer (<i>P</i><0.001), ferritin (<i>P</i>=0.039), and hemoglobin (<i>P</i>=0.006) levels were significantly different between the groups after the intervention. Neutrophil recovery was remarkably higher in the case than in the control group (<i>P</i><0.001). However, plasmapheresis did not affect the length of hospital stay (P=0.076), which could have significantly increased survival rates (<i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the study findings, plasmapheresis led to a significant improvement in laboratory markers and survival rate in patients with severe COVID-19. These findings reinforce the value of plasmapheresis in cancer patients as a critical population suffering from neutropenia and insufficient immune responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":46224,"journal":{"name":"Blood Research","volume":"58 2","pages":"91-98"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/b7/br-58-2-91.PMC10310491.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2023.2022201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: With the emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and inability of healthcare systems to control the disease, various therapeutic theories with controversial responses have been proposed. Plasmapheresis was administered as a medication. However, the knowledge of its efficacy and indications is inadequate. This study evaluated the use of plasmapheresis in critically ill patients with cancer.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 86 patients with malignancies, including a control group (N=41) and an intervention group (N=45) with severe COVID-19 during 2020-21. Both groups were treated with routine medications for COVID-19 management according to national guidelines, and plasmapheresis was applied to the intervention group. C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, ferritin, lactate dehydrogenase, hemoglobin, and white blood cell, polymorphonuclear, lymphocyte, and platelet levels were measured at admission and at the end of plasmapheresis. Other variables included neutrophil recovery, intensive care unit admission, intubation requirements, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization outcomes.

Results: CRP(P<0.001), D-dimer (P<0.001), ferritin (P=0.039), and hemoglobin (P=0.006) levels were significantly different between the groups after the intervention. Neutrophil recovery was remarkably higher in the case than in the control group (P<0.001). However, plasmapheresis did not affect the length of hospital stay (P=0.076), which could have significantly increased survival rates (P<0.001).

Conclusion: Based on the study findings, plasmapheresis led to a significant improvement in laboratory markers and survival rate in patients with severe COVID-19. These findings reinforce the value of plasmapheresis in cancer patients as a critical population suffering from neutropenia and insufficient immune responses.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血浆置换治疗新冠肺炎重症感染所致嗜中性粒细胞减少患者细胞因子风暴的疗效。
背景:随着2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的出现和卫生系统对疾病控制的无力,各种治疗理论被提出,但反应存在争议。血浆置换是一种药物。然而,其疗效和适应症的知识是不足的。本研究评估血浆置换在危重癌症患者中的应用。方法:本随机临床试验选取2020-21年重症COVID-19恶性肿瘤患者86例,包括对照组(N=41)和干预组(N=45)。两组均按照国家指南给予新冠肺炎常规药物治疗,干预组采用血浆置换。c -反应蛋白(CRP)、d -二聚体、铁蛋白、乳酸脱氢酶、血红蛋白、白细胞、多形核、淋巴细胞和血小板水平在入院时和血浆置换结束时测定。其他变量包括中性粒细胞恢复、重症监护病房入院、插管要求、住院时间和住院结果。结果:干预后两组间CRP(PPP=0.039)、血红蛋白(P=0.006)水平差异有统计学意义。结论:根据研究结果,血浆置换术可显著改善重症COVID-19患者的实验室指标和生存率。这些发现加强了血浆置换在患有中性粒细胞减少症和免疫反应不足的癌症患者中的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Research
Blood Research HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊最新文献
Correction: Hepatitis B surface antigen reverse seroconversion after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation according to the baseline serological marker levels and vaccination status: a single‑center database analysis. Recent advances in and applications of ex vivo drug sensitivity analysis for blood cancers. PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy for refractory EBV-positive DLBCL: a retrospective analysis. Back to basics: the coagulation pathway. Real-world experience of emicizumab prophylaxis in Korean children with severe hemophilia A without inhibitors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1