Effect of neonatal seizure burden and etiology on the long-term outcome: data from a randomized, controlled trial

Sara K. Trowbridge, Lois O. Condie, Jessica R. Landers, Ann M. Bergin, Patricia E. Grant, Kalpathy Krishnamoorthy, Valerie Rofeberg, David Wypij, Kevin J. Staley, Janet S. Soul, for the Boston Bumetanide Trial Group
{"title":"Effect of neonatal seizure burden and etiology on the long-term outcome: data from a randomized, controlled trial","authors":"Sara K. Trowbridge,&nbsp;Lois O. Condie,&nbsp;Jessica R. Landers,&nbsp;Ann M. Bergin,&nbsp;Patricia E. Grant,&nbsp;Kalpathy Krishnamoorthy,&nbsp;Valerie Rofeberg,&nbsp;David Wypij,&nbsp;Kevin J. Staley,&nbsp;Janet S. Soul,&nbsp;for the Boston Bumetanide Trial Group","doi":"10.1002/cns3.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Neonatal seizures are common, but the impact of neonatal seizures on long-term neurologic outcomes remains unclear. We addressed this question by analyzing data from an early-phase controlled trial of bumetanide to treat neonatal seizures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Neonatal seizure burden was calculated from continuous video-electroencephalogram data. Neurologic outcome was determined by standardized developmental tests and postneonatal seizure recurrence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 111 enrolled neonates, 43 were randomized to treatment or control groups. There were no differences in neurologic outcomes between treatment and control groups. A subgroup analysis was performed for 84 neonates with acute perinatal brain injury (57 hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy [HIE], 18 stroke, 9 intracranial hemorrhage [ICH]), most of whom (70%) had neonatal seizures. There was a significant negative correlation between seizure burden and developmental scores (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Associations between seizure burden and developmental scores were stronger in HIE and stroke groups compared with ICH (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Bumetanide showed no long-term beneficial or adverse effects, as expected based on treatment duration versus duration of neonatal seizures. For neonates with perinatal brain injury, higher neonatal seizure burden correlated significantly with the worse developmental outcome, particularly for ischemic versus hemorrhagic brain injury. These data highlight the need for further investigation of the long-term effects of both neonatal seizure severity and etiology.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72232,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Child Neurology Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"53-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cns3.8","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Child Neurology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cns3.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Neonatal seizures are common, but the impact of neonatal seizures on long-term neurologic outcomes remains unclear. We addressed this question by analyzing data from an early-phase controlled trial of bumetanide to treat neonatal seizures.

Methods

Neonatal seizure burden was calculated from continuous video-electroencephalogram data. Neurologic outcome was determined by standardized developmental tests and postneonatal seizure recurrence.

Results

Of 111 enrolled neonates, 43 were randomized to treatment or control groups. There were no differences in neurologic outcomes between treatment and control groups. A subgroup analysis was performed for 84 neonates with acute perinatal brain injury (57 hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy [HIE], 18 stroke, 9 intracranial hemorrhage [ICH]), most of whom (70%) had neonatal seizures. There was a significant negative correlation between seizure burden and developmental scores (p < 0.01). Associations between seizure burden and developmental scores were stronger in HIE and stroke groups compared with ICH (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Bumetanide showed no long-term beneficial or adverse effects, as expected based on treatment duration versus duration of neonatal seizures. For neonates with perinatal brain injury, higher neonatal seizure burden correlated significantly with the worse developmental outcome, particularly for ischemic versus hemorrhagic brain injury. These data highlight the need for further investigation of the long-term effects of both neonatal seizure severity and etiology.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿癫痫负担和病因对长期预后的影响:来自一项随机对照试验的数据
背景:新生儿癫痫发作是常见的,但新生儿癫痫发作对长期神经系统预后的影响尚不清楚。我们通过分析布美他尼治疗新生儿癫痫发作的早期对照试验数据来解决这个问题。方法利用连续视频脑电图资料计算新生儿癫痫发作负担。神经系统预后通过标准化发育测试和新生儿后癫痫复发来确定。结果111例新生儿中,43例随机分为治疗组和对照组。治疗组与对照组的神经系统预后无差异。对84例围生期急性脑损伤新生儿(缺氧缺血性脑病[HIE] 57例,脑卒中18例,颅内出血[ICH] 9例)进行亚组分析,其中大多数(70%)发生新生儿癫痫发作。癫痫发作负担与发育评分呈显著负相关(p < 0.01)。与脑出血组相比,HIE组和脑卒中组癫痫发作负担与发育评分的相关性更强(p < 0.05)。结论布美他尼没有长期的有益或不良影响,正如预期的治疗持续时间与新生儿癫痫发作持续时间。对于围产期脑损伤的新生儿,较高的新生儿癫痫负担与较差的发育结局显著相关,特别是缺血性脑损伤与出血性脑损伤。这些数据强调需要进一步研究新生儿癫痫发作严重程度和病因的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Postconcussive symptom severity, risk factors for prolonged recovery, and mental health history: Pathways of influence in a diverse pediatric sample GRIN1-related epilepsy in a neonate with response to memantine and vigabatrin Exaggerated T-wave alternans in children with Angelman syndrome Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1