S S Dumbuya, O O Ayandipo, I O Smalle, J C Boima, M A Dawo, O A Ajagbe, T O Ogundiran
{"title":"VOLUMETRIC CLASSIFICATION OF INGUINOSCROTAL SWELLINGS.","authors":"S S Dumbuya, O O Ayandipo, I O Smalle, J C Boima, M A Dawo, O A Ajagbe, T O Ogundiran","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>External hernias and scrotal swellings are diverse in presentation and are described in many subjective ways.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To create an objective classification of inguinoscrotal swellings in the rural setting.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>It was a prospective study on the measurement of inguinoscrotal swellings volume/contents in a cohort of surgical patients in a provincial general hospital in the north of Sierra Leone over a three-year period. For inguinal hernias and other scrotal swellings, the volume ranges of 0- 500ml were used in the classification; for femoral and other external hernias which generally do not reach 'huge' sizes, the volume ranges of 0-100 ml were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 962 external hernias and hydroceles were classified over a 3- year period. Most, 610 (63.4%) were inguino-scrotal hernias, others were hydroceles, 303 (31.0%) and femoral hernias, 42 (4.3%). The remaining small number consisted of umbilical (4) and epigastric (3) hernias. For the common conditions of hydroceles, inguinal and femoral hernias, about 50% were 'small', more than 40% were 'large', the rest were giant. The same findings were true for epigastric and umbilical hernias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using the scale that we adopted, majority of the groin hernias and hydroceles were in the small and large categories with a few giant varieties. Volumetric-based classification of hernias and hydroceles can help surgeons communicate more clearly based on standard rather than arbitrary ascription of descriptive terminologies to these very common surgical entities.</p>","PeriodicalId":72221,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/41/8e/AIPM-20-115.PMC10295090.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: External hernias and scrotal swellings are diverse in presentation and are described in many subjective ways.
Aim: To create an objective classification of inguinoscrotal swellings in the rural setting.
Patients and methods: It was a prospective study on the measurement of inguinoscrotal swellings volume/contents in a cohort of surgical patients in a provincial general hospital in the north of Sierra Leone over a three-year period. For inguinal hernias and other scrotal swellings, the volume ranges of 0- 500ml were used in the classification; for femoral and other external hernias which generally do not reach 'huge' sizes, the volume ranges of 0-100 ml were used.
Results: A total of 962 external hernias and hydroceles were classified over a 3- year period. Most, 610 (63.4%) were inguino-scrotal hernias, others were hydroceles, 303 (31.0%) and femoral hernias, 42 (4.3%). The remaining small number consisted of umbilical (4) and epigastric (3) hernias. For the common conditions of hydroceles, inguinal and femoral hernias, about 50% were 'small', more than 40% were 'large', the rest were giant. The same findings were true for epigastric and umbilical hernias.
Conclusion: Using the scale that we adopted, majority of the groin hernias and hydroceles were in the small and large categories with a few giant varieties. Volumetric-based classification of hernias and hydroceles can help surgeons communicate more clearly based on standard rather than arbitrary ascription of descriptive terminologies to these very common surgical entities.