Concordance Between the Ask Suicide Screening Questions (ASQ) and Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Self Report (SITBI-SR) Among Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Archives of Suicide Research Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-29 DOI:10.1080/13811118.2023.2252027
Annabelle M Mournet, Vanessa H Bal, Evan M Kleiman
{"title":"Concordance Between the Ask Suicide Screening Questions (ASQ) and Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Self Report (SITBI-SR) Among Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults.","authors":"Annabelle M Mournet, Vanessa H Bal, Evan M Kleiman","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2023.2252027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to examine concordance between two commonly used measures of suicidal thoughts and behaviors: the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) and the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Self Report (SITBI-SR). Agreement was operationalized as the presence past month suicidal ideation and lifetime suicide attempts. To explore the utilization of these tools among neurodiverse samples, we also examined the concordance across autistic and non-autistic adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 200 individuals recruited online. Half of the sample self-reported a diagnosis of autism. A series of Cohen's kappas and confidence intervals were computed to assess agreement between the ASQ and SITBI-SR. Cohen's kappa was computed separately for each set of comparisons for the autistic and non-autistic samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Past month suicidal ideation had a kappa of 0.61 (95%CI = 0.48-0.73). The kappa for lifetime suicide attempts was 0.86 (95%CI = 0.78-0.94). There were no significant differences in agreement between the two measures for autistic versus non-autistic individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current findings suggest that the ASQ and SITBI-SR have high concordance with one another. Given that the ASQ and the SITBI-SR are both validated in the general population and that concordance was high and not significantly different based on autism status, the current study provides preliminary evidence that the ASQ and the SITBI-SR function similarly for autistic individuals.HIGHLIGHTSPeople do not always respond consistently to different STB assessment methods.Findings suggest that the ASQ and SITBI-SR have high concordance with one another.Evidence provided that these measures function similarly for autistic individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Suicide Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2023.2252027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study sought to examine concordance between two commonly used measures of suicidal thoughts and behaviors: the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) and the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Self Report (SITBI-SR). Agreement was operationalized as the presence past month suicidal ideation and lifetime suicide attempts. To explore the utilization of these tools among neurodiverse samples, we also examined the concordance across autistic and non-autistic adults.

Methods: The sample consisted of 200 individuals recruited online. Half of the sample self-reported a diagnosis of autism. A series of Cohen's kappas and confidence intervals were computed to assess agreement between the ASQ and SITBI-SR. Cohen's kappa was computed separately for each set of comparisons for the autistic and non-autistic samples.

Results: Past month suicidal ideation had a kappa of 0.61 (95%CI = 0.48-0.73). The kappa for lifetime suicide attempts was 0.86 (95%CI = 0.78-0.94). There were no significant differences in agreement between the two measures for autistic versus non-autistic individuals.

Conclusions: Current findings suggest that the ASQ and SITBI-SR have high concordance with one another. Given that the ASQ and the SITBI-SR are both validated in the general population and that concordance was high and not significantly different based on autism status, the current study provides preliminary evidence that the ASQ and the SITBI-SR function similarly for autistic individuals.HIGHLIGHTSPeople do not always respond consistently to different STB assessment methods.Findings suggest that the ASQ and SITBI-SR have high concordance with one another.Evidence provided that these measures function similarly for autistic individuals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症和非自闭症成人自杀筛查问题(ASQ)与自伤想法和行为访谈-自我报告(SITBI-SR)之间的一致性。
研究目的本研究旨在检验两种常用的自杀想法和行为测量方法之间的一致性:自杀筛查提问(ASQ)和自伤想法和行为访谈-自我报告(SITBI-SR)。同意与否被定义为上个月是否存在自杀意念和一生中是否有自杀企图。为了探索这些工具在神经多样性样本中的使用情况,我们还研究了自闭症和非自闭症成人之间的一致性:样本由在线招募的 200 人组成。方法:样本由在线招募的 200 人组成,其中一半自我报告诊断为自闭症。我们计算了一系列科恩卡方和置信区间,以评估 ASQ 和 SITBI-SR 之间的一致性。自闭症和非自闭症样本的每组比较都分别计算了科恩卡帕:上个月自杀意念的 kappa 为 0.61(95%CI = 0.48-0.73)。终生自杀未遂的 kappa 值为 0.86(95%CI = 0.78-0.94)。自闭症患者与非自闭症患者在这两项测量的一致性方面没有明显差异:目前的研究结果表明,ASQ 和 SITBI-SR 具有很高的一致性。鉴于 ASQ 和 SITBI-SR 都在普通人群中得到了验证,而且两者的一致性很高,并且没有因自闭症状态而产生显著差异,因此本研究提供了初步证据,证明 ASQ 和 SITBI-SR 对自闭症患者的作用类似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Archives of Suicide Research, the official journal of the International Academy of Suicide Research (IASR), is the international journal in the field of suicidology. The journal features original, refereed contributions on the study of suicide, suicidal behavior, its causes and effects, and techniques for prevention. The journal incorporates research-based and theoretical articles contributed by a diverse range of authors interested in investigating the biological, pharmacological, psychiatric, psychological, and sociological aspects of suicide.
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record Measures of Safety Planning Practices as Part of Zero Suicide Implementation. Acceptability and Feasibility of an Ecological Momentary Intervention for Managing Emotional Distress Among Psychiatric Inpatients at Risk for Suicide. The Progression of Lethality Across Multiple Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review. The Transtheoretical Model of Change and Recovery from a Suicidal Episode. Assessing a Suicide Prevention Helpline's Impact on Caller Crisis Level and Suicidality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1