Catarina Félix, Pedro Barreiro, Rui Mendo, André Mascarenhas, Cristina Chagas
{"title":"Outcomes and Learning Curve in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Rectal Neoplasms with Severe Fibrosis: Experience of a Western Center.","authors":"Catarina Félix, Pedro Barreiro, Rui Mendo, André Mascarenhas, Cristina Chagas","doi":"10.1159/000522579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of lesions with severe submucosal fibrosis has been associated with worse outcomes, such as lower curative resection rate and higher incidence of adverse events. This study aims to investigate its true impact on rectal ESD performed in the West and to assess predictive factors of severe fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study including all rectal ESDs performed at our tertiary center from January 2013 to January 2021. Lesions were grouped as nonsevere fibrosis or severe fibrosis. ESD outcomes, predictors of severe fibrosis, and the learning curve were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ESD was performed in 195 lesions, 45 with severe fibrosis. Three resections were interrupted (one due to severe fibrosis). The presence of severe fibrosis was related to a significantly lower resection speed (16.93 mm<sup>2</sup>/min vs. 24.66 mm<sup>2</sup>/min, <i>p</i> = 0.007), en bloc (86.4% vs. 96.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.019), R0 (61.4% vs. 79.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.013), and curative (54.5% vs. 78.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.003) resection rates and a higher rate of hybrid ESD required to complete resection (13.6% vs. 2.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.005). No significant difference was noted regarding adverse events rate (18.2% vs. 8.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.09). Male sex, ulcerative colitis, pelvic radiotherapy, a lesion on the anastomotic site, previous manipulation, and deep submucosal invasion were independent predictors for severe fibrosis. En bloc resection rate improved during time (60.0% vs. 94.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Severe submucosal fibrosis is an important factor related to noncurative resections and challenging rectal ESD. Factors predicting its severity are extremely important and could allow more experienced endoscopists to be assigned to more difficult cases, allowing safer procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51838,"journal":{"name":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a2/db/pjg-0030-0221.PMC10305249.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000522579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of lesions with severe submucosal fibrosis has been associated with worse outcomes, such as lower curative resection rate and higher incidence of adverse events. This study aims to investigate its true impact on rectal ESD performed in the West and to assess predictive factors of severe fibrosis.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including all rectal ESDs performed at our tertiary center from January 2013 to January 2021. Lesions were grouped as nonsevere fibrosis or severe fibrosis. ESD outcomes, predictors of severe fibrosis, and the learning curve were evaluated.
Results: ESD was performed in 195 lesions, 45 with severe fibrosis. Three resections were interrupted (one due to severe fibrosis). The presence of severe fibrosis was related to a significantly lower resection speed (16.93 mm2/min vs. 24.66 mm2/min, p = 0.007), en bloc (86.4% vs. 96.6%, p = 0.019), R0 (61.4% vs. 79.7%, p = 0.013), and curative (54.5% vs. 78.4%, p = 0.003) resection rates and a higher rate of hybrid ESD required to complete resection (13.6% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.005). No significant difference was noted regarding adverse events rate (18.2% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.09). Male sex, ulcerative colitis, pelvic radiotherapy, a lesion on the anastomotic site, previous manipulation, and deep submucosal invasion were independent predictors for severe fibrosis. En bloc resection rate improved during time (60.0% vs. 94.1%, p = 0.018).
Conclusions: Severe submucosal fibrosis is an important factor related to noncurative resections and challenging rectal ESD. Factors predicting its severity are extremely important and could allow more experienced endoscopists to be assigned to more difficult cases, allowing safer procedures.
内镜下粘膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗严重粘膜下纤维化病变的预后较差,如治愈率较低,不良事件发生率较高。本研究旨在探讨其对西方国家直肠ESD的真正影响,并评估严重纤维化的预测因素。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,包括2013年1月至2021年1月在我们三级中心进行的所有直肠esd。病变分为非严重纤维化和严重纤维化。评估ESD结果、严重纤维化的预测因素和学习曲线。结果:在195个病变中行ESD,其中45个有严重纤维化。3例手术中断(1例因严重纤维化)。严重纤维化的存在与较低的切除速度(16.93 mm2/min vs. 24.66 mm2/min, p = 0.007)、整体(86.4% vs. 96.6%, p = 0.019)、R0 (61.4% vs. 79.7%, p = 0.013)、治愈率(54.5% vs. 78.4%, p = 0.003)和完成切除所需的较高的混合型ESD率(13.6% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.005)相关。两组不良事件发生率无显著差异(18.2% vs 8.1%, p = 0.09)。男性、溃疡性结肠炎、盆腔放疗、吻合口病变、既往操作和深部粘膜下浸润是严重纤维化的独立预测因素。整体切除率随时间提高(60.0% vs 94.1%, p = 0.018)。结论:严重的粘膜下纤维化是导致直肠ESD无法治愈的重要因素。预测其严重程度的因素非常重要,可以让更有经验的内窥镜医生被分配到更困难的病例中,从而实现更安全的手术。
期刊介绍:
The ''GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology'' (formerly Jornal Português de Gastrenterologia), founded in 1994, is the official publication of Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia (Portuguese Society of Gastroenterology), Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (Portuguese Society of Digestive Endoscopy) and Associação Portuguesa para o Estudo do Fígado (Portuguese Association for the Study of the Liver). The journal publishes clinical and basic research articles on Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy, Hepatology and related topics. Review articles, clinical case studies, images, letters to the editor and other articles such as recommendations or papers on gastroenterology clinical practice are also considered. Only articles written in English are accepted.