Outcomes and Learning Curve in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Rectal Neoplasms with Severe Fibrosis: Experience of a Western Center.

IF 1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1159/000522579
Catarina Félix, Pedro Barreiro, Rui Mendo, André Mascarenhas, Cristina Chagas
{"title":"Outcomes and Learning Curve in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Rectal Neoplasms with Severe Fibrosis: Experience of a Western Center.","authors":"Catarina Félix,&nbsp;Pedro Barreiro,&nbsp;Rui Mendo,&nbsp;André Mascarenhas,&nbsp;Cristina Chagas","doi":"10.1159/000522579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of lesions with severe submucosal fibrosis has been associated with worse outcomes, such as lower curative resection rate and higher incidence of adverse events. This study aims to investigate its true impact on rectal ESD performed in the West and to assess predictive factors of severe fibrosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study including all rectal ESDs performed at our tertiary center from January 2013 to January 2021. Lesions were grouped as nonsevere fibrosis or severe fibrosis. ESD outcomes, predictors of severe fibrosis, and the learning curve were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ESD was performed in 195 lesions, 45 with severe fibrosis. Three resections were interrupted (one due to severe fibrosis). The presence of severe fibrosis was related to a significantly lower resection speed (16.93 mm<sup>2</sup>/min vs. 24.66 mm<sup>2</sup>/min, <i>p</i> = 0.007), en bloc (86.4% vs. 96.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.019), R0 (61.4% vs. 79.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.013), and curative (54.5% vs. 78.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.003) resection rates and a higher rate of hybrid ESD required to complete resection (13.6% vs. 2.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.005). No significant difference was noted regarding adverse events rate (18.2% vs. 8.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.09). Male sex, ulcerative colitis, pelvic radiotherapy, a lesion on the anastomotic site, previous manipulation, and deep submucosal invasion were independent predictors for severe fibrosis. En bloc resection rate improved during time (60.0% vs. 94.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Severe submucosal fibrosis is an important factor related to noncurative resections and challenging rectal ESD. Factors predicting its severity are extremely important and could allow more experienced endoscopists to be assigned to more difficult cases, allowing safer procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51838,"journal":{"name":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a2/db/pjg-0030-0221.PMC10305249.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000522579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of lesions with severe submucosal fibrosis has been associated with worse outcomes, such as lower curative resection rate and higher incidence of adverse events. This study aims to investigate its true impact on rectal ESD performed in the West and to assess predictive factors of severe fibrosis.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study including all rectal ESDs performed at our tertiary center from January 2013 to January 2021. Lesions were grouped as nonsevere fibrosis or severe fibrosis. ESD outcomes, predictors of severe fibrosis, and the learning curve were evaluated.

Results: ESD was performed in 195 lesions, 45 with severe fibrosis. Three resections were interrupted (one due to severe fibrosis). The presence of severe fibrosis was related to a significantly lower resection speed (16.93 mm2/min vs. 24.66 mm2/min, p = 0.007), en bloc (86.4% vs. 96.6%, p = 0.019), R0 (61.4% vs. 79.7%, p = 0.013), and curative (54.5% vs. 78.4%, p = 0.003) resection rates and a higher rate of hybrid ESD required to complete resection (13.6% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.005). No significant difference was noted regarding adverse events rate (18.2% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.09). Male sex, ulcerative colitis, pelvic radiotherapy, a lesion on the anastomotic site, previous manipulation, and deep submucosal invasion were independent predictors for severe fibrosis. En bloc resection rate improved during time (60.0% vs. 94.1%, p = 0.018).

Conclusions: Severe submucosal fibrosis is an important factor related to noncurative resections and challenging rectal ESD. Factors predicting its severity are extremely important and could allow more experienced endoscopists to be assigned to more difficult cases, allowing safer procedures.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直肠肿瘤伴严重纤维化的内镜下粘膜下解剖的结果和学习曲线:西方中心的经验。
内镜下粘膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗严重粘膜下纤维化病变的预后较差,如治愈率较低,不良事件发生率较高。本研究旨在探讨其对西方国家直肠ESD的真正影响,并评估严重纤维化的预测因素。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性研究,包括2013年1月至2021年1月在我们三级中心进行的所有直肠esd。病变分为非严重纤维化和严重纤维化。评估ESD结果、严重纤维化的预测因素和学习曲线。结果:在195个病变中行ESD,其中45个有严重纤维化。3例手术中断(1例因严重纤维化)。严重纤维化的存在与较低的切除速度(16.93 mm2/min vs. 24.66 mm2/min, p = 0.007)、整体(86.4% vs. 96.6%, p = 0.019)、R0 (61.4% vs. 79.7%, p = 0.013)、治愈率(54.5% vs. 78.4%, p = 0.003)和完成切除所需的较高的混合型ESD率(13.6% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.005)相关。两组不良事件发生率无显著差异(18.2% vs 8.1%, p = 0.09)。男性、溃疡性结肠炎、盆腔放疗、吻合口病变、既往操作和深部粘膜下浸润是严重纤维化的独立预测因素。整体切除率随时间提高(60.0% vs 94.1%, p = 0.018)。结论:严重的粘膜下纤维化是导致直肠ESD无法治愈的重要因素。预测其严重程度的因素非常重要,可以让更有经验的内窥镜医生被分配到更困难的病例中,从而实现更安全的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology
GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
62
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology'' (formerly Jornal Português de Gastrenterologia), founded in 1994, is the official publication of Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia (Portuguese Society of Gastroenterology), Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (Portuguese Society of Digestive Endoscopy) and Associação Portuguesa para o Estudo do Fígado (Portuguese Association for the Study of the Liver). The journal publishes clinical and basic research articles on Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy, Hepatology and related topics. Review articles, clinical case studies, images, letters to the editor and other articles such as recommendations or papers on gastroenterology clinical practice are also considered. Only articles written in English are accepted.
期刊最新文献
Portuguese Pancreatic Club Perspectives on Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Staging, Associated Genetic Syndromes and Particularities of Their Clinical Approach. Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Gynecological Surgery: An Atypical Endoscopic Diagnosis. Portuguese Pancreatic Club Perspectives on Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided and Surgical Treatment of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Schwannoma of Common Bile Duct: A Clinico-Radiologic Diagnostic Quagmire – A Case Report Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Using Band Ligation of a Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1