Self-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents.

Arjun Watane, Hasenin Al-Khersan, Meghana Kalavar, Bilal Ahmed, Michael Venincasa, Jayanth Sridhar
{"title":"Self-Reported Social Media Use among Ophthalmology Residents.","authors":"Arjun Watane,&nbsp;Hasenin Al-Khersan,&nbsp;Meghana Kalavar,&nbsp;Bilal Ahmed,&nbsp;Michael Venincasa,&nbsp;Jayanth Sridhar","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1736661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  To assess ophthalmology trainees' self-reported use of and attitudes toward social media. <b>Methods</b>  An online survey was distributed by email to ophthalmology residency applicants of the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between September 2016 and January 2020. <b>Results</b>  Of the 1,688 email recipients, the survey was filled by 208 ophthalmology trainees (12.3%). Nearly all trainees reported using social media for personal purposes (92.3%), while less than half used social media for professional purposes (43.4%). There were mixed sentiments regarding the impact of social media on the patient-physician relationship, with the majority feeling that it challenges a physician's authority (55.2%) but also empowers the patient (57.5%) and encourages shared care (92.8%). Twenty-five percent of trainees had reviewed professional social media guidelines, and most rated the quality of medical information on social media as \"poor\" (60.9%). There were low rates of trainees looking up patients (13.8%), providing their account information to patients (1.5%), responding to patients' messages (2.6%), following patients' accounts (2.6%), and being followed by patients (2.6%). <b>Conclusion</b>  The majority of ophthalmology trainees are active on social media. As these trainees enter practice, ophthalmology will likely see a rise in social media use. Training programs should consider a formal social media policy that is shared with all trainees as part of their education.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"13 2","pages":"e195-e199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/94/a6/10-1055-s-0041-1736661.PMC9928015.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective  To assess ophthalmology trainees' self-reported use of and attitudes toward social media. Methods  An online survey was distributed by email to ophthalmology residency applicants of the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between September 2016 and January 2020. Results  Of the 1,688 email recipients, the survey was filled by 208 ophthalmology trainees (12.3%). Nearly all trainees reported using social media for personal purposes (92.3%), while less than half used social media for professional purposes (43.4%). There were mixed sentiments regarding the impact of social media on the patient-physician relationship, with the majority feeling that it challenges a physician's authority (55.2%) but also empowers the patient (57.5%) and encourages shared care (92.8%). Twenty-five percent of trainees had reviewed professional social media guidelines, and most rated the quality of medical information on social media as "poor" (60.9%). There were low rates of trainees looking up patients (13.8%), providing their account information to patients (1.5%), responding to patients' messages (2.6%), following patients' accounts (2.6%), and being followed by patients (2.6%). Conclusion  The majority of ophthalmology trainees are active on social media. As these trainees enter practice, ophthalmology will likely see a rise in social media use. Training programs should consider a formal social media policy that is shared with all trainees as part of their education.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼科住院医师自我报告的社交媒体使用情况。
目的了解眼科培训生自我报告的社交媒体使用情况及态度。方法2016年9月至2020年1月,通过电子邮件向巴斯科姆帕尔默眼科研究所眼科住院医师申请人进行在线调查。结果在1,688名电子邮件收件人中,208名眼科实习生(12.3%)填写了调查问卷。几乎所有的学员都表示将社交媒体用于个人目的(92.3%),而将社交媒体用于专业目的的不到一半(43.4%)。关于社交媒体对医患关系的影响,有不同的看法,大多数人认为它挑战了医生的权威(55.2%),但也赋予了病人权力(57.5%),并鼓励分享护理(92.8%)。25%的受训者审查了专业的社交媒体指南,大多数人认为社交媒体上的医疗信息质量“差”(60.9%)。学员查找患者(13.8%)、向患者提供账户信息(1.5%)、回复患者信息(2.6%)、关注患者账户(2.6%)和被患者关注(2.6%)的比例较低。结论大部分眼科实习生在社交媒体上表现活跃。随着这些实习生进入实践,眼科可能会看到社交媒体的使用增加。培训项目应考虑制定正式的社交媒体政策,并将其作为培训的一部分与所有学员共享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data. Self-Reported Perceptions of Preparedness among Incoming Ophthalmology Residents. The Matthew Effect: Prevalence of Doctor and Physician Parents among Ophthalmology Applicants. Gender Representation on North American Ophthalmology Societies' Governance Boards. The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1