The Relationship Between the Endoscopic Healing Index, Fecal Calprotectin, and Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Crohn's Disease.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of clinical gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000001904
Emily S Smith, Johnson Chen, Yushan Pan, Prerna Mahtani, Dana Lukin, Waseem Ahmed, Randy Longman, Robert Burakoff, Ellen Scherl, Robert Battat
{"title":"The Relationship Between the Endoscopic Healing Index, Fecal Calprotectin, and Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Crohn's Disease.","authors":"Emily S Smith, Johnson Chen, Yushan Pan, Prerna Mahtani, Dana Lukin, Waseem Ahmed, Randy Longman, Robert Burakoff, Ellen Scherl, Robert Battat","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000001904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The serum-based endoscopic healing index (EHI) test identifies endoscopic Crohn's disease (CD) activity. Data are lacking on the relationship between EHI with other endpoints. We assessed the relationship between EHI and the simplified Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were prospectively collected on patients with CD with either an EHI or fecal calprotectin (FCAL) within 90 days of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using area under the receiver operator characteristics. Proportions with any, severe, and terminal ileum MR inflammation were compared above/below identified thresholds for both EHI and FCAL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 241 MREs paired to either EHI or FCAL from 155 patients were included. Both EHI and FCAL had similar accuracy to diagnose inflammation (area under the receiver operator characteristics: EHI: 0.635 to 0.651, FCAL: 0.680 to 0.708). Optimal EHI values were 42 and 26 for inflammation on MRE and endoscopy, respectively. Patients with EHI ≥42 (100% vs. 63%, P =0.002), FCAL >50 µg/g (87% vs. 64%, P <0.001) and FCAL >250 µg/g (90% vs. 75%, P =0.02) had higher rates of simplified Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity ≥1 compared with lower values. EHI differentiated ileitis numerically more than FCAL (delta: 24% to 25% vs. 11% to 21%). Patients with FCAL ≥50 µg/g had higher rates of severe inflammation compared with FCAL <50 µg/g (75% vs. 47%, P <0.001), whereas smaller differentiation existed for EHI threshold of 42 (63% vs. 49%, P =0.35).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both EHI and FCAL were specific in their confirmation of inflammation and disease activity on MRE in patients with CD. However, MRE-detected inflammation was frequently present in the presence of low EHI and FCAL in similar proportions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10879448/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001904","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The serum-based endoscopic healing index (EHI) test identifies endoscopic Crohn's disease (CD) activity. Data are lacking on the relationship between EHI with other endpoints. We assessed the relationship between EHI and the simplified Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity.

Materials and methods: Data were prospectively collected on patients with CD with either an EHI or fecal calprotectin (FCAL) within 90 days of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using area under the receiver operator characteristics. Proportions with any, severe, and terminal ileum MR inflammation were compared above/below identified thresholds for both EHI and FCAL.

Results: A total of 241 MREs paired to either EHI or FCAL from 155 patients were included. Both EHI and FCAL had similar accuracy to diagnose inflammation (area under the receiver operator characteristics: EHI: 0.635 to 0.651, FCAL: 0.680 to 0.708). Optimal EHI values were 42 and 26 for inflammation on MRE and endoscopy, respectively. Patients with EHI ≥42 (100% vs. 63%, P =0.002), FCAL >50 µg/g (87% vs. 64%, P <0.001) and FCAL >250 µg/g (90% vs. 75%, P =0.02) had higher rates of simplified Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity ≥1 compared with lower values. EHI differentiated ileitis numerically more than FCAL (delta: 24% to 25% vs. 11% to 21%). Patients with FCAL ≥50 µg/g had higher rates of severe inflammation compared with FCAL <50 µg/g (75% vs. 47%, P <0.001), whereas smaller differentiation existed for EHI threshold of 42 (63% vs. 49%, P =0.35).

Conclusion: Both EHI and FCAL were specific in their confirmation of inflammation and disease activity on MRE in patients with CD. However, MRE-detected inflammation was frequently present in the presence of low EHI and FCAL in similar proportions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克罗恩病患者的内镜愈合指数、粪便钙蛋白和磁共振肠造影之间的关系。
简介基于血清的内镜下愈合指数(EHI)检测可确定内镜下克罗恩病(CD)的活动性。目前尚缺乏有关 EHI 与其他终点之间关系的数据。我们评估了 EHI 与简化的磁共振活动指数之间的关系:前瞻性地收集了磁共振肠造影(MRE)90 天内有 EHI 或粪便钙蛋白(FCAL)的 CD 患者的数据。诊断准确性采用受体运算特征下面积进行评估。比较了任何、严重和末端回肠磁共振炎症高于/低于 EHI 和 FCAL 识别阈值的比例:共纳入了 155 名患者的 241 个与 EHI 或 FCAL 配对的 MRE。EHI和FCAL诊断炎症的准确性相似(接收器操作者特征下面积:EHI:0.635;FCAL:0.635;接收器操作者特征下面积:0.635):EHI:0.635 至 0.651,FCAL:0.680 至 0.708)。MRE 和内窥镜检查诊断炎症的最佳 EHI 值分别为 42 和 26。EHI≥42 (100% vs. 63%, P=0.002)、FCAL >50 µg/g (87% vs. 64%, P250 µg/g (90% vs. 75%, P=0.02)患者的简化磁共振活动指数≥1的比例高于较低值。EHI 对回肠炎的区分度在数值上高于 FCAL(delta:24% 至 25% 对 11% 至 21%)。与 FCAL 相比,FCAL ≥50 µg/g 的患者出现严重炎症的比例更高:EHI和FCAL在确认CD患者的MRE中的炎症和疾病活动方面都具有特异性。然而,在 EHI 和 FCAL 低的情况下,MRE 检测到的炎症也经常出现,且比例相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Colonoscopy Use Among Asian Indians in New York City, 2003 to 2016. Application of a Machine Learning Predictive Model for Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis. FIB-4 as a Time-varying Covariate and Its Association With Severe Liver Disease in Primary Care: A Time-dependent Cox Regression Analysis. Cold Versus Hot Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Sessile Serrated Colorectal Polyps ≥10 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Safety of Percutaneous Endoscopic Jejunostomy Placement Compared With Surgical and Radiologic Jejunostomy Placement: A Nationwide Inpatient Assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1