Economic Evaluations of mHealth Interventions for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes: A Scoping Review.

IF 4.1 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1177/19322968231183956
Ida Tornvall, Danelle Kenny, Befikadu Legesse Wubishet, Anthony Russell, Anish Menon, Tracy Comans
{"title":"Economic Evaluations of mHealth Interventions for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Ida Tornvall, Danelle Kenny, Befikadu Legesse Wubishet, Anthony Russell, Anish Menon, Tracy Comans","doi":"10.1177/19322968231183956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is plenty of evidence supporting the clinical benefits of mHealth interventions for type 2 diabetes, but despite often being promoted as cost-effective or cost-saving, there is still limited research to support such claims. The objective of this review was to summarize and critically analyze the current body of economic evaluation (EE) studies for mHealth interventions for type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a comprehensive search strategy, five databases were searched for full and partial EE studies for mHealth interventions for type 2 diabetes from January 2007 to March 2022. \"mHealth\" was defined as any intervention that used a mobile device with cellular technology to collect and/or provide data or information for the management of type 2 diabetes. The CHEERS 2022 checklist was used to appraise the reporting of the full EEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies were included in the review; nine full and three partial evaluations. Text messages smartphone applications were the most common mHealth features. The majority of interventions also included a Bluetooth-connected medical device, eg, glucose or blood pressure monitors. All studies reported their intervention to be cost-effective or cost-saving, however, most studies' reporting were of moderate quality with a median CHEERS score of 59%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current literature indicates that mHealth interventions for type 2 diabetes can be cost-saving or cost-effective, however, the quality of the reporting can be substantially improved. Heterogeneity makes it difficult to compare study outcomes, and the failure to report on key items leaves insufficient information for decision-makers to consider.</p>","PeriodicalId":15475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"179-190"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11688683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968231183956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is plenty of evidence supporting the clinical benefits of mHealth interventions for type 2 diabetes, but despite often being promoted as cost-effective or cost-saving, there is still limited research to support such claims. The objective of this review was to summarize and critically analyze the current body of economic evaluation (EE) studies for mHealth interventions for type 2 diabetes.

Methods: Using a comprehensive search strategy, five databases were searched for full and partial EE studies for mHealth interventions for type 2 diabetes from January 2007 to March 2022. "mHealth" was defined as any intervention that used a mobile device with cellular technology to collect and/or provide data or information for the management of type 2 diabetes. The CHEERS 2022 checklist was used to appraise the reporting of the full EEs.

Results: Twelve studies were included in the review; nine full and three partial evaluations. Text messages smartphone applications were the most common mHealth features. The majority of interventions also included a Bluetooth-connected medical device, eg, glucose or blood pressure monitors. All studies reported their intervention to be cost-effective or cost-saving, however, most studies' reporting were of moderate quality with a median CHEERS score of 59%.

Conclusion: The current literature indicates that mHealth interventions for type 2 diabetes can be cost-saving or cost-effective, however, the quality of the reporting can be substantially improved. Heterogeneity makes it difficult to compare study outcomes, and the failure to report on key items leaves insufficient information for decision-makers to consider.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移动医疗干预对 2 型糖尿病管理的经济评估:范围综述》。
背景:有大量证据支持移动医疗干预对 2 型糖尿病的临床益处,但尽管经常被宣传为具有成本效益或节约成本,支持这种说法的研究仍然有限。本综述旨在总结和批判性分析目前针对 2 型糖尿病移动医疗干预措施的经济评估(EE)研究:采用综合检索策略,在五个数据库中检索了 2007 年 1 月至 2022 年 3 月期间针对移动医疗干预 2 型糖尿病的全部和部分 EE 研究。"移动医疗 "被定义为使用移动设备和蜂窝技术收集和/或提供数据或信息以管理2型糖尿病的任何干预措施。CHEERS2022检查表用于评估完整EEs的报告:结果:12 项研究被纳入综述;其中 9 项为全面评估,3 项为部分评估。短信智能手机应用程序是最常见的移动医疗功能。大多数干预措施还包括蓝牙连接的医疗设备,如葡萄糖或血压计。所有研究都称其干预措施具有成本效益或节约成本,但大多数研究的报告质量一般,CHEERS 评分中位数为 59%:目前的文献表明,针对 2 型糖尿病的移动医疗干预措施可以节约成本或具有成本效益,但报告的质量还有待大幅提高。由于存在异质性,因此很难对研究结果进行比较,而未对关键项目进行报告也会导致决策者无法获得足够的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Diabetes Technology Society. JDST covers scientific and clinical aspects of diabetes technology including glucose monitoring, insulin and metabolic peptide delivery, the artificial pancreas, digital health, precision medicine, social media, cybersecurity, software for modeling, physiologic monitoring, technology for managing obesity, and diagnostic tests of glycation. The journal also covers the development and use of mobile applications and wireless communication, as well as bioengineered tools such as MEMS, new biomaterials, and nanotechnology to develop new sensors. Articles in JDST cover both basic research and clinical applications of technologies being developed to help people with diabetes.
期刊最新文献
How to Provide Additional Oversight to Ensure That Remote Patient Monitoring for People With Diabetes is Being Used and Billed Appropriately. Impact of Recording Interval in Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Calculating the Metrics of Glycemic Control. Effectiveness of Mobile Health Applications for Cardiometabolic Risk Reduction in Urban and Rural India: A Pilot, Randomized Controlled Study. Efficacy and Safety of an Electronic Glycemic Management System for Optimizing Insulin Therapy in Noncritical Patients With Diabetes: A Randomized Trial. Using One-Shot Prompting of Non-Fine-Tuned Commercial Artificial Intelligence to Assess Nutrients from Photographs of Japanese Meals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1