Which Occupations Did People Engage in during Lockdown? A European Cross-Sectional Descriptive Survey by Generation.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION Occupational Therapy International Pub Date : 2023-08-21 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/3979298
Cynthia Engels, Lauriane Segaux, Amandine Ibanez, Florence Canouï-Poitrine, Charlotte Lafont
{"title":"Which Occupations Did People Engage in during Lockdown? A European Cross-Sectional Descriptive Survey by Generation.","authors":"Cynthia Engels, Lauriane Segaux, Amandine Ibanez, Florence Canouï-Poitrine, Charlotte Lafont","doi":"10.1155/2023/3979298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective was to describe the occupations people engaged in more frequently during lockdown than before the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic as a function of generation. The secondary objectives were to (i) describe the levels of importance, performance, and satisfaction for these occupations and (ii) identify factors affecting the levels of importance, performance, and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted an online, cross-sectional survey of young adults (YAs, aged 18-39), middle-aged adults (MAs, aged 40-59), and older adults (OAs, aged 60 or over).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2534 participants (YAs: 47%, MAs: 33%, and OAs: 20%) cited 4500 occupations. The occupations in which people most engaged were leisure occupations (67%), followed by productive occupations (31%) and then self-care (2%) occupations. YAs gave a median (interquartile range) importance score of 8 (6; 9) to leisure, 8 (7; 10) to productivity, and 8 (7; 10) to self-care. MAs gave a median importance score of 8 (6; 10) to leisure, 8 (7; 10) to productivity, and 8 (7; 10) to self-care. OAs gave a median importance score of 8 (7; 10) to leisure, 8 (7; 9) to productivity, and 9 (8; 10) to self-care. In a pre-/postlockdown comparison, the changes in performance scores among YAs were +5 (3; 6) for leisure, +4 (2; 5) for productivity, and +4 (3; 6) for self-care. Among MAs, these changes were, respectively, +4 (3; 6), +3 (2; 5), and +4.5 (3; 6). Among OAs, these changes were, respectively, +3 (1; 5) for leisure, +3 (2; 5) for productivity, and +2 (0; 4) for self-care. The changes in satisfaction scores among YAs were +3 (0; 5) for leisure, +3 (0; 5) for productivity, and +3 (1; 6) for self-care. Among MAs, these changes were, respectively, +3 (0; 5), +2 (0; 4), and +5 (0; 6). Among OAs, these changes were, respectively, +2 (0; 4), +2 (0; 4), and +2 (0; 4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lockdown led to stronger engagements in quiet leisure and alternative forms of socialization. Occupational therapists may have a role in helping community-dwelling people to balance and structure their new daily routine.</p>","PeriodicalId":49140,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Therapy International","volume":"2023 ","pages":"3979298"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10462442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Therapy International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3979298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective was to describe the occupations people engaged in more frequently during lockdown than before the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic as a function of generation. The secondary objectives were to (i) describe the levels of importance, performance, and satisfaction for these occupations and (ii) identify factors affecting the levels of importance, performance, and satisfaction.

Method: We conducted an online, cross-sectional survey of young adults (YAs, aged 18-39), middle-aged adults (MAs, aged 40-59), and older adults (OAs, aged 60 or over).

Results: 2534 participants (YAs: 47%, MAs: 33%, and OAs: 20%) cited 4500 occupations. The occupations in which people most engaged were leisure occupations (67%), followed by productive occupations (31%) and then self-care (2%) occupations. YAs gave a median (interquartile range) importance score of 8 (6; 9) to leisure, 8 (7; 10) to productivity, and 8 (7; 10) to self-care. MAs gave a median importance score of 8 (6; 10) to leisure, 8 (7; 10) to productivity, and 8 (7; 10) to self-care. OAs gave a median importance score of 8 (7; 10) to leisure, 8 (7; 9) to productivity, and 9 (8; 10) to self-care. In a pre-/postlockdown comparison, the changes in performance scores among YAs were +5 (3; 6) for leisure, +4 (2; 5) for productivity, and +4 (3; 6) for self-care. Among MAs, these changes were, respectively, +4 (3; 6), +3 (2; 5), and +4.5 (3; 6). Among OAs, these changes were, respectively, +3 (1; 5) for leisure, +3 (2; 5) for productivity, and +2 (0; 4) for self-care. The changes in satisfaction scores among YAs were +3 (0; 5) for leisure, +3 (0; 5) for productivity, and +3 (1; 6) for self-care. Among MAs, these changes were, respectively, +3 (0; 5), +2 (0; 4), and +5 (0; 6). Among OAs, these changes were, respectively, +2 (0; 4), +2 (0; 4), and +2 (0; 4).

Conclusions: Lockdown led to stronger engagements in quiet leisure and alternative forms of socialization. Occupational therapists may have a role in helping community-dwelling people to balance and structure their new daily routine.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人们在封锁期间从事哪些职业?一项按世代划分的欧洲横断面描述性调查。
目的:首要目标是描述与 2019 年冠状病毒疾病大流行之前相比,人们在封锁期间更频繁地从事的职业,并将其与世代联系起来。次要目标是:(i) 描述这些职业的重要性、绩效和满意度水平;(ii) 确定影响重要性、绩效和满意度水平的因素:我们对年轻人(YAs,18-39 岁)、中年人(MAs,40-59 岁)和老年人(OAs,60 岁或以上)进行了在线横断面调查。结果:2534 名参与者(YAs:47%;MAs:33%;OAs:20%)列举了 4500 种职业。人们从事最多的职业是休闲职业(67%),其次是生产性职业(31%),然后是自我保健职业(2%)。青年演员对休闲职业的重视程度的中位数(四分位数间距)为 8 (6; 9),对生产性职业的重视程度为 8 (7; 10),对自我保健职业的重视程度为 8 (7; 10)。管理者对休闲、工作效率和自我保健的重视程度的中位数分别为 8 (6; 10)、8 (7; 10)和 8 (7; 10)。OA 对休闲的重视程度中位数为 8 (7; 10),对工作效率的重视程度中位数为 8 (7; 9),对自我保健的重视程度中位数为 9 (8; 10)。在停工前/停工后的比较中,青年助理在休闲方面的表现得分变化为 +5 (3; 6),在工作效率方面的表现得分变化为 +4 (2; 5),在自我照顾方面的表现得分变化为 +4 (3; 6)。在管理助理中,这些变化分别为 +4 (3;6)、+3 (2;5) 和 +4.5 (3;6)。在职业助理中,这些变化分别为休闲 +3 (1; 5)、工作效率 +3 (2; 5)和自我照顾 +2 (0; 4)。青年助理的满意度变化分别为:休闲+3 (0; 5)分,工作效率+3 (0; 5)分,自我照顾+3 (1; 6)分。在管理助理中,这些变化分别为 +3 (0;5)、+2 (0;4) 和 +5 (0;6)。在 OA 中,这些变化分别为 +2 (0;4)、+2 (0;4) 和 +2 (0;4):禁闭导致更多的人参与安静的休闲活动和其他形式的社交活动。职业治疗师可以在帮助社区居民平衡和安排新的日常生活方面发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Occupational Therapy International is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing manuscripts that reflect the practice of occupational therapy throughout the world. Research studies or original concept papers are considered for publication. Priority for publication will be given to research studies that provide recommendations for evidence-based practice and demonstrate the effectiveness of a specific treatment method. Single subject case studies evaluating treatment effectiveness are also encouraged. Other topics that are appropriate for the journal include reliability and validity of clinical instruments, assistive technology, community rehabilitation, cultural comparisons, health promotion and wellness.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of a Video-Based Game Exercise Program on Motor Skills, Proprioception, and Cognitive Functions in Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities. Occupational Performance in the Discipline of Occupational Therapy During COVID-19 at a Public University in KwaZulu-Natal. Exploring Goal Attainment Scaling Among Occupational Therapy Students: A Retrospective Descriptive Analysis. Investigation of the Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Basic Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire in Preschool Children. The Development of a Vocational Rehabilitation Program to Assist Individuals With MDRTB and TB in Returning to Work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1