Effect of High-Versus Low-Frequency of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Follow-Up Testing on Overall Survival in Patients With Stage II Or III Colon Cancer

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical colorectal cancer Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clcc.2023.05.003
Jeongseok Jeon , Da Bin Lee , Sang Joon Shin , Dai Hoon Han , Jee Suk Chang , Yoon Dae Han , Hyunwook Kim , Joon Seok Lim , Han Sang Kim , Joong Bae Ahn
{"title":"Effect of High-Versus Low-Frequency of Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography Follow-Up Testing on Overall Survival in Patients With Stage II Or III Colon Cancer","authors":"Jeongseok Jeon ,&nbsp;Da Bin Lee ,&nbsp;Sang Joon Shin ,&nbsp;Dai Hoon Han ,&nbsp;Jee Suk Chang ,&nbsp;Yoon Dae Han ,&nbsp;Hyunwook Kim ,&nbsp;Joon Seok Lim ,&nbsp;Han Sang Kim ,&nbsp;Joong Bae Ahn","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2023.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Intensive surveillance of colon cancer by using the abdominopelvic computed tomography (AP-CT) is common in real world practice; however, it is still unclear whether high-frequency surveillance using AP-CT in patients with these risk factors is superior to that in the low-frequency surveillance.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed 1803 patients with stage II-III colon cancer receiving curative surgery between January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2015. We evaluated the average scan-to-scan intervals of postoperative AP-CT testing and assigned patients with an interval of 5 to 8 and 9 to 13 months to the high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) groups, respectively. The cutoff value of preoperative and postoperative CEA levels was 5 ng/mL. We also applied propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust clinicopathologic differences between the 2 groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We matched 1:1 for each surveillance group yielding a cohort of 776 matched patients. After PSM, Baseline demographics were overall well balanced between 2 groups. Stage III (OR, 2.00; 95% Confidence interval [CI], 1.21-3.30) and postoperative CEA elevation (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.08-4.92) were independent risk factors of recurrence in multivariate analyses. Patient in the HF group had more surgery plus chemo- or radiotherapy as postrecurrence treatment than patient in the LF group (46.2% vs. 23.1%, <em>P</em> = .017). This trend was retained after PSM, although it is not significant (44.4% vs. 23.1%, <em>P</em> = .060). However, survival outcomes of high-frequency AP-CT surveillance were not superior to those of low-frequency surveillance in all subgroups, including stage III (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.40-2.47) and postoperative CEA elevation (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.45-4.11).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>High-frequency AP-CT testing is associated with a higher proportion of surgery plus chemo- or radiotherapy as postrecurrence treatment, without improvement in 5-year overall survival.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10373,"journal":{"name":"Clinical colorectal cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical colorectal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1533002823000488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intensive surveillance of colon cancer by using the abdominopelvic computed tomography (AP-CT) is common in real world practice; however, it is still unclear whether high-frequency surveillance using AP-CT in patients with these risk factors is superior to that in the low-frequency surveillance.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 1803 patients with stage II-III colon cancer receiving curative surgery between January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2015. We evaluated the average scan-to-scan intervals of postoperative AP-CT testing and assigned patients with an interval of 5 to 8 and 9 to 13 months to the high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) groups, respectively. The cutoff value of preoperative and postoperative CEA levels was 5 ng/mL. We also applied propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust clinicopathologic differences between the 2 groups.

Results

We matched 1:1 for each surveillance group yielding a cohort of 776 matched patients. After PSM, Baseline demographics were overall well balanced between 2 groups. Stage III (OR, 2.00; 95% Confidence interval [CI], 1.21-3.30) and postoperative CEA elevation (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.08-4.92) were independent risk factors of recurrence in multivariate analyses. Patient in the HF group had more surgery plus chemo- or radiotherapy as postrecurrence treatment than patient in the LF group (46.2% vs. 23.1%, P = .017). This trend was retained after PSM, although it is not significant (44.4% vs. 23.1%, P = .060). However, survival outcomes of high-frequency AP-CT surveillance were not superior to those of low-frequency surveillance in all subgroups, including stage III (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.40-2.47) and postoperative CEA elevation (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.45-4.11).

Conclusion

High-frequency AP-CT testing is associated with a higher proportion of surgery plus chemo- or radiotherapy as postrecurrence treatment, without improvement in 5-year overall survival.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高-低-低频率腹部计算机断层摄影Follow-Up检测对癌症II或III期患者总体生存率的影响
背景应用腹盆腔计算机断层扫描(AP-CT)对癌症进行强化监测在现实生活中很常见;然而,目前尚不清楚在有这些危险因素的患者中使用AP-CT的高频监测是否优于低频监测。患者和方法回顾性分析了2005年1月1日至2015年12月31日期间接受手术治疗的1803例癌症Ⅱ-Ⅲ期患者。我们评估了术后AP-CT测试的平均扫描间隔,并将间隔5至8个月和9至13个月的患者分别分为高频(HF)组和低频(LF)组。术前和术后CEA水平的临界值为5 ng/mL。我们还应用倾向评分匹配(PSM)和治疗加权的逆概率来调整两组之间的临床病理差异。结果我们对每个监测组进行1:1的配对,得到776名配对患者。PSM后,基线人口统计数据在两组之间总体平衡良好。在多变量分析中,III期(OR,2.00;95%置信区间[CI],1.21-3.30)和术后CEA升高(OR,2.30;95%CI,1.08-4.92)是复发的独立危险因素。HF组的患者比LF组的患者有更多的手术加化疗或放疗作为复发后治疗(46.2%对23.1%,P=.017)。PSM后这一趋势得到了保留,尽管并不显著(44.4%对23.1%)。然而,在所有亚组中,高频AP-CT监测的生存结果并不优于低频监测,包括III期(HR 0.99,95%CI 0.40-2.47)和术后CEA升高(HR 1.36,95%CI 0.45-4.11)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical colorectal cancer
Clinical colorectal cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
64
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Colorectal Cancer is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of gastrointestinal cancers. Clinical Colorectal Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of colorectal, pancreatic, liver, and other gastrointestinal cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to gastrointestinal cancers. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of contents Intensification of Local Therapy With High Dose Rate, Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (HDR-IORT) and Extended Resection for Locally Advanced and Recurrent Colorectal Cancer Differential Efficacy of Targeted Monoclonal Antibodies in Left-Sided Colon and Rectal Metastatic Cancers Preoperative Radiotherapy Decision-Tree for Rectal Cancer Patients: A Real-World Analysis Based on the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1