Nonpharmacological Behavior Guidance for Children During Preventive Dental Visits: A Systematic Review-Part 1.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pediatric dentistry Pub Date : 2023-05-15
Vineet Dhar, Cameron L Randall, Abdullah A Marghalani, Jayakumar Jayaraman, Chia-Yu Chen, Martha Wells, Clarice Law, Elizabeth Gosnell, Martina Majstorović, Janice Townsend, Rachel Wedeward
{"title":"Nonpharmacological Behavior Guidance for Children During Preventive Dental Visits: A Systematic Review-Part 1.","authors":"Vineet Dhar,&nbsp;Cameron L Randall,&nbsp;Abdullah A Marghalani,&nbsp;Jayakumar Jayaraman,&nbsp;Chia-Yu Chen,&nbsp;Martha Wells,&nbsp;Clarice Law,&nbsp;Elizabeth Gosnell,&nbsp;Martina Majstorović,&nbsp;Janice Townsend,&nbsp;Rachel Wedeward","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of nonpharmacological behavior guidance interventions used for a child undergoing preventive dental visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases: Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Embase, and Cochrane Library, were searched from 1946 to February 2022, for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing effectiveness of basic and advanced nonpharmacological techniques rendered during a pre- ventive visit including examination, prophylaxis, fluoride application and radiographs. Workgroup (WG) identified moderate-to-high quality system- atic reviews (SRs) published on hypnosis, audiovisual distraction, and parental presence/ absence; and decided to exclude these interventions from current SR to avoid duplication. The primary outcome measures for the studied interventions included reduction in anxiety, fear, pain, and improve- ment in cooperative behavior. Eight authors determined the included RCTs, performed data extraction, and assessed the risk of bias. Standardized Mean Difference calculation and assignment of quality of evidence by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach were done.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen articles qualified for analysis from 219 screened articles. WG found studies evaluating effectiveness of pre- visit preparation and in-office strategies rendered pre- or during treatment such as positive imagery, communication, modeling, tell-show-do, magic tricks, mobile applications, positive reinforcement, and sensory adapted dental environment. The certainty of evidence ranged from Very low to Moderate and the magnitude of effect varied from trivial to a large change in the desired outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most basic nonpharmacological behavior guidance techniques showed trivial to small reduction in self-reported anxiety and/or improvement in behavior, with mobile application and modeling showing large effects in reduction of anxiety based on some rating scales. Systematic Review Registration Number: PROSPERO: CRD42022314723.</p>","PeriodicalId":19863,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of nonpharmacological behavior guidance interventions used for a child undergoing preventive dental visits.

Methods: Databases: Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost), Embase, and Cochrane Library, were searched from 1946 to February 2022, for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing effectiveness of basic and advanced nonpharmacological techniques rendered during a pre- ventive visit including examination, prophylaxis, fluoride application and radiographs. Workgroup (WG) identified moderate-to-high quality system- atic reviews (SRs) published on hypnosis, audiovisual distraction, and parental presence/ absence; and decided to exclude these interventions from current SR to avoid duplication. The primary outcome measures for the studied interventions included reduction in anxiety, fear, pain, and improve- ment in cooperative behavior. Eight authors determined the included RCTs, performed data extraction, and assessed the risk of bias. Standardized Mean Difference calculation and assignment of quality of evidence by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach were done.

Results: Fifteen articles qualified for analysis from 219 screened articles. WG found studies evaluating effectiveness of pre- visit preparation and in-office strategies rendered pre- or during treatment such as positive imagery, communication, modeling, tell-show-do, magic tricks, mobile applications, positive reinforcement, and sensory adapted dental environment. The certainty of evidence ranged from Very low to Moderate and the magnitude of effect varied from trivial to a large change in the desired outcomes.

Conclusions: Most basic nonpharmacological behavior guidance techniques showed trivial to small reduction in self-reported anxiety and/or improvement in behavior, with mobile application and modeling showing large effects in reduction of anxiety based on some rating scales. Systematic Review Registration Number: PROSPERO: CRD42022314723.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童预防性牙科就诊的非药物行为指导:系统综述-第1部分。
目的:评估非药物行为指导干预用于儿童预防性牙科就诊的有效性。方法:检索Ovid MEDLINE、PsycINFO (EBSCOhost)、Embase和Cochrane Library数据库,检索1946年至2022年2月的随机临床试验(rct),比较预防性就诊期间基本和高级非药物技术的有效性,包括检查、预防、氟化物应用和x线片。工作组(WG)确定了关于催眠、视听干扰和父母在场/不在场的中高质量系统评价(SRs);并决定将这些干预措施从当前的SR中排除,以避免重复。研究干预措施的主要结果包括焦虑、恐惧、疼痛的减少和合作行为的改善。8位作者确定纳入的rct,进行数据提取,并评估偏倚风险。采用推荐评分法、发展法和评价法进行标准化均差计算和证据质量分配。结果:219篇筛选文章中有15篇符合分析条件。工作组发现了评估就诊前准备和治疗前或治疗期间的办公室策略有效性的研究,如积极意象、沟通、建模、告诉-展示-做、魔术、移动应用程序、积极强化和感官适应牙科环境。证据的确定性从非常低到中等,效果的大小从期望结果的微小变化到巨大变化不等。结论:大多数基本的非药物行为指导技术在自我报告的焦虑和/或行为改善方面显示出微不足道的减少,移动应用程序和建模显示出基于某些评级量表的焦虑减少效果很大。系统评价注册号:PROSPERO: CRD42022314723。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric dentistry
Pediatric dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINEPEDIATRI-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
74
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Dentistry is the official publication of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry. It is published bi-monthly and is internationally recognized as the leading journal in the area of pediatric dentistry. The journal promotes the practice, education and research specifically related to the specialty of pediatric dentistry. This peer-reviewed journal features scientific articles, case reports and abstracts of current pediatric dental research.
期刊最新文献
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Short Fiber Reinforced Composite and Glass Hybrid Restoration for Molars Affected by Molar Hypomineralization. Oral Health in the Down Syndrome Population: Parental Perceptions on Dental Care in the United States. Early Introduction of Total Sugar Foods and Early Childhood Caries. Articaine Infiltration Versus Lidocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Primary Mandibular Molars: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Pre-, Peri-, and Postnatal Risk for the Development of Enamel Defects in Permanent Dentition: A Birth Cohort in Southern Brazil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1