"Vegan" and "plant-based" claims: risk implications for milk- and egg-allergic consumers in Canada.

Silvia Dominguez, Jérémie Théolier, Kamila Lizée, Beatrice Povolo, Jennifer Gerdts, Samuel B Godefroy
{"title":"\"Vegan\" and \"plant-based\" claims: risk implications for milk- and egg-allergic consumers in Canada.","authors":"Silvia Dominguez, Jérémie Théolier, Kamila Lizée, Beatrice Povolo, Jennifer Gerdts, Samuel B Godefroy","doi":"10.1186/s13223-023-00836-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The market share of foods carrying labels suggesting absence of animal ingredients has significantly increased in recent years. The purpose of this study was to document the purchasing behaviour of egg- or milk-allergic consumers vis-à-vis food marketed as \"vegan\" and \"plant-based\", and to evaluate the associated allergenic risk. A survey was conducted among egg- and milk-allergic consumers and revealed that 86% (margin of error 5.4%; confidence level 95%) would buy \"vegan\" products, indicating this label may be perceived as a substitute for \"free from milk and eggs\". To assess the risk posed by these products, 87 prepackaged foods with \"vegan\" and/or \"plant-based\" claims purchased in Quebec were tested for milk proteins, and 64 for egg proteins. Overall, 5.7% and 0% occurrence of milk and egg proteins, respectively, were observed, suggesting that the analysed prepackaged foods carrying \"vegan\" and/or \"plant-based\" labels pose little risk to egg- or milk-allergic consumers. However, this is likely due to allergen management practices applied by the Canadian manufacturers of the products tested, and should not be attributed to the use of \"vegan\" or similar labels. Enhanced regulatory requirements for the use of these labels, and an education campaign on their meaning with respect to allergy-related risks, are necessary to better inform and protect egg- and milk-allergic consumers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7702,"journal":{"name":"Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology : Official Journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","volume":"19 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10464346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology : Official Journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-023-00836-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The market share of foods carrying labels suggesting absence of animal ingredients has significantly increased in recent years. The purpose of this study was to document the purchasing behaviour of egg- or milk-allergic consumers vis-à-vis food marketed as "vegan" and "plant-based", and to evaluate the associated allergenic risk. A survey was conducted among egg- and milk-allergic consumers and revealed that 86% (margin of error 5.4%; confidence level 95%) would buy "vegan" products, indicating this label may be perceived as a substitute for "free from milk and eggs". To assess the risk posed by these products, 87 prepackaged foods with "vegan" and/or "plant-based" claims purchased in Quebec were tested for milk proteins, and 64 for egg proteins. Overall, 5.7% and 0% occurrence of milk and egg proteins, respectively, were observed, suggesting that the analysed prepackaged foods carrying "vegan" and/or "plant-based" labels pose little risk to egg- or milk-allergic consumers. However, this is likely due to allergen management practices applied by the Canadian manufacturers of the products tested, and should not be attributed to the use of "vegan" or similar labels. Enhanced regulatory requirements for the use of these labels, and an education campaign on their meaning with respect to allergy-related risks, are necessary to better inform and protect egg- and milk-allergic consumers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“素食主义者”和“植物性”声明:对加拿大牛奶和鸡蛋过敏的消费者的风险影响。
近年来,贴有不含动物成分标签的食品的市场份额显著增加。本研究的目的是记录对鸡蛋或牛奶过敏的消费者对-à-vis“素食”和“植物性”食品的购买行为,并评估相关的过敏风险。在对鸡蛋和牛奶过敏的消费者中进行了一项调查,结果显示86%(误差幅度5.4%;置信水平95%)会购买“纯素”产品,这表明这个标签可能被视为“不含牛奶和鸡蛋”的替代品。为了评估这些产品带来的风险,在魁北克购买了87种声称是“纯素食”和/或“植物性”的预包装食品,对牛奶蛋白进行了测试,对64种鸡蛋蛋白进行了测试。总体而言,观察到牛奶和鸡蛋蛋白的发生率分别为5.7%和0%,这表明所分析的带有“纯素”和/或“植物性”标签的预包装食品对鸡蛋或牛奶过敏的消费者构成的风险很小。然而,这可能是由于被测试产品的加拿大制造商采用的过敏原管理措施,而不应归因于使用“素食”或类似标签。为了更好地告知和保护鸡蛋和牛奶过敏的消费者,有必要加强对这些标签使用的监管要求,并开展有关其与过敏相关风险含义的教育活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Immunoglobulin utilization in Canada: a comparative analysis of provincial guidelines and a scoping review of the literature. Mental health problems associated with idiopathic anaphylaxis. Validity of fractional exhaled nitric oxide and small airway lung function measured by IOS in the diagnosis of cough variant asthma in preschool children with chronic cough. Treatment of idiopathic anaphylaxis with dupilumab: a case report. PRevalence of the Eosinophilic Phenotype Among SeveRE asthma patients in Lebanon: results of the PREPARE study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1