Safety and efficacy of cataract surgery performed with a low-energy femtosecond laser compared with conventional phacoemulsification in Chinese patients: a randomized clinical trial.
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of cataract surgery performed with a low-energy femtosecond laser compared with conventional phacoemulsification in Chinese patients: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Kai-Jing Zhou, Yusen Huang, Yong Wang, An-Peng Pan, Xu Shao, Rui-Xue Tu, A-Yong Yu","doi":"10.1186/s40662-023-00347-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare the safety and efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) performed with the low-energy FEMTO LDV Z8 (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG, Port, Switzerland) laser compared with conventional phacoemulsification (CP) in Chinese patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, multicenter, interventional study included 126 patients who were randomized (1:1) to undergo either FLACS or CP followed by intraocular lens (IOL) implantation between January 2019 and April 2020. The primary endpoint included the comparison of the endothelial cell loss (ECL) between the two groups at 3 months. Secondary endpoints included the comparison of cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), change in central corneal thickness (CCT) from baseline, and postoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities (UDVA and CDVA) in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At all postoperative time points, the FLACS group was found to be non-inferior to CP for the mean ECL (- 409.3 versus - 436.9 cells/mm<sup>2</sup> at 3 months) and mean CDE (4.1 versus 4.5 percent-seconds). The increase in CCT was significantly lower in the FLACS group compared with the CP group at Day 7 (4.9 versus 9.2 µm; P = 0.04); however, the difference was not statistically significant at 1 and 3 months. Postoperatively, mean UDVA and CDVA were comparable between the two groups. No intraoperative complications occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cataract surgery performed with a low-energy femtosecond laser was non-inferior to CP; however, the FLACS group had a statistically significantly lower increase in CCT at Day 7 compared with CP. Trial registration This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on May 15, 2019, with trial registration number: NCT03953053.</p>","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-023-00347-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: To compare the safety and efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) performed with the low-energy FEMTO LDV Z8 (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG, Port, Switzerland) laser compared with conventional phacoemulsification (CP) in Chinese patients.
Methods: This prospective, multicenter, interventional study included 126 patients who were randomized (1:1) to undergo either FLACS or CP followed by intraocular lens (IOL) implantation between January 2019 and April 2020. The primary endpoint included the comparison of the endothelial cell loss (ECL) between the two groups at 3 months. Secondary endpoints included the comparison of cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), change in central corneal thickness (CCT) from baseline, and postoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities (UDVA and CDVA) in the two groups.
Results: At all postoperative time points, the FLACS group was found to be non-inferior to CP for the mean ECL (- 409.3 versus - 436.9 cells/mm2 at 3 months) and mean CDE (4.1 versus 4.5 percent-seconds). The increase in CCT was significantly lower in the FLACS group compared with the CP group at Day 7 (4.9 versus 9.2 µm; P = 0.04); however, the difference was not statistically significant at 1 and 3 months. Postoperatively, mean UDVA and CDVA were comparable between the two groups. No intraoperative complications occurred.
Conclusions: Cataract surgery performed with a low-energy femtosecond laser was non-inferior to CP; however, the FLACS group had a statistically significantly lower increase in CCT at Day 7 compared with CP. Trial registration This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on May 15, 2019, with trial registration number: NCT03953053.
背景:比较使用低能量FEMTO LDV Z8 (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG, Port, Switzerland)激光进行飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)与常规超声乳化手术(CP)在中国患者中的安全性和有效性。方法:这项前瞻性、多中心、介入性研究包括126名患者,他们在2019年1月至2020年4月期间随机(1:1)接受FLACS或CP,随后接受人工晶状体(IOL)植入术。主要终点包括两组在3个月时内皮细胞损失(ECL)的比较。次要终点包括两组的累积耗散能(CDE)、角膜中央厚度(CCT)与基线的变化、术后未矫正和矫正的距离视力(UDVA和CDVA)的比较。结果:在术后所有时间点,FLACS组的平均ECL(3个月时- 409.3 vs - 436.9细胞/mm2)和平均CDE (4.1 vs 4.5%秒)均不逊于CP。第7天,FLACS组CCT的增加明显低于CP组(4.9 vs 9.2µm;p = 0.04);然而,在1个月和3个月时,差异无统计学意义。术后两组平均UDVA和CDVA具有可比性。无术中并发症发生。结论:低能量飞秒激光进行白内障手术的效果不逊于CP;然而,与CP组相比,FLACS组在第7天的CCT增幅在统计学上显著降低。试验注册该试验于2019年5月15日在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,试验注册号:NCT03953053。
期刊介绍:
ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.