On the origin of the genetic code.

IF 1 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Genes & genetic systems Pub Date : 2023-06-23 DOI:10.1266/ggs.22-00085
Masayuki Seki
{"title":"On the origin of the genetic code.","authors":"Masayuki Seki","doi":"10.1266/ggs.22-00085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mechanisms underlying how the genetic code was generated by Darwinian selection have remained elusive since the code was cracked in 1965. Here, I propose a hypothesis on the emergence of the genetic code and predict that its emergence was driven by sequential distinct selective pressures. According to the hypothesis, aminoacyl-RNAs for Glu, Asp, Lys, Tyr, His, Arg, Cys and Ser were first selected as cartridge-type subunits of three-subunit ribozymes. Aminoacyl-RNA subunits acting as cofactors were accommodated by the proto P-site of the large subunit of ribozymes. Importantly, I predict that there was no direct relationship between amino acids and codon and anticodon pairs. Duplication of the proto P-site could have created the proto A-site, enabling multi-subunit ribozymes to simultaneously interact with two-cartridge-type aminoacyl-RNA subunits. Random insertion of two cartridges would have instantly abolished enzymatic activity of multi-subunit ribozymes. On the other hand, if two tandemly aligned pairs of codons and anticodons specify two cartridges, dozens of different active pockets in multi-subunit ribozymes would have rapidly emerged, leading to the rise of extant organisms' metabolic pathways. The strong driving force of Darwinian selection described here could have created the primary genetic code for catalytic amino acids. Evolution of the protein translation system and events leading to the expansion of the genetic code until the time it was \"frozen\" are presented in detail.</p>","PeriodicalId":12690,"journal":{"name":"Genes & genetic systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genes & genetic systems","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1266/ggs.22-00085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Mechanisms underlying how the genetic code was generated by Darwinian selection have remained elusive since the code was cracked in 1965. Here, I propose a hypothesis on the emergence of the genetic code and predict that its emergence was driven by sequential distinct selective pressures. According to the hypothesis, aminoacyl-RNAs for Glu, Asp, Lys, Tyr, His, Arg, Cys and Ser were first selected as cartridge-type subunits of three-subunit ribozymes. Aminoacyl-RNA subunits acting as cofactors were accommodated by the proto P-site of the large subunit of ribozymes. Importantly, I predict that there was no direct relationship between amino acids and codon and anticodon pairs. Duplication of the proto P-site could have created the proto A-site, enabling multi-subunit ribozymes to simultaneously interact with two-cartridge-type aminoacyl-RNA subunits. Random insertion of two cartridges would have instantly abolished enzymatic activity of multi-subunit ribozymes. On the other hand, if two tandemly aligned pairs of codons and anticodons specify two cartridges, dozens of different active pockets in multi-subunit ribozymes would have rapidly emerged, leading to the rise of extant organisms' metabolic pathways. The strong driving force of Darwinian selection described here could have created the primary genetic code for catalytic amino acids. Evolution of the protein translation system and events leading to the expansion of the genetic code until the time it was "frozen" are presented in detail.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遗传密码的起源。
自1965年遗传密码被破解以来,遗传密码是如何由达尔文选择产生的,其背后的机制一直难以捉摸。在这里,我提出了一个关于遗传密码出现的假设,并预测它的出现是由顺序不同的选择压力驱动的。根据这一假设,首先选择Glu、Asp、Lys、Tyr、His、Arg、Cys和Ser的氨基酰基rna作为三亚基核酶的墨盒型亚基。作为辅助因子的氨基酰基rna亚基被核酶大亚基的原p位点所容纳。重要的是,我预测氨基酸与密码子和反密码子对之间没有直接关系。原p位点的复制可以产生原a位点,使多亚基核酶能够同时与双墨盒型氨基酰基rna亚基相互作用。随机插入两个药筒会立即消除多亚基核酶的酶活性。另一方面,如果两对连续排列的密码子和反密码子指定了两个卡壳,那么在多亚基核酶中就会迅速出现几十个不同的活性口袋,从而导致现存生物体代谢途径的兴起。这里描述的达尔文选择的强大驱动力可能创造了催化氨基酸的原始遗传密码。详细介绍了蛋白质翻译系统的进化和导致遗传密码扩展的事件,直到它被“冻结”的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genes & genetic systems
Genes & genetic systems 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Genes & Genetic Systems , formerly the Japanese Journal of Genetics , is published bimonthly by the Genetics Society of Japan.
期刊最新文献
Development and characterization of expressed sequence tag-simple sequence repeat markers for the near-threatened halophyte, Limonium tetragonum (Thunb.) A. A. Bullock (Plumbaginaceae). Next-generation sequencing analysis with a population-specific human reference genome. Mutagenic effects of ultraviolet radiation and trimethyl psoralen in mycoplasma toward a minimal genome. FOXM1 derived from Triple negative breast cancer exosomes promotes cancer progression by activating IDO1 transcription in macrophages to suppress ferroptosis and induce M2 polarization of Tumor-associated macrophages. Identification of abiotic stress-responsive genes: a genome-wide analysis of the cytokinin response regulator gene family in rice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1