Comparison of survival by vasoactive-inotropic score in patients receiving veno-arterial extracorporeal life support.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL International Journal of Artificial Organs Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-25 DOI:10.1177/03913988231193443
Phillip Weeks, Kelly Dunton, Brian Gulbis, Marwan Jumean, Lisa Janowiak, Igor Banjac, Rajko Radovancevic, Igor Gregoric, Biswajit Kar
{"title":"Comparison of survival by vasoactive-inotropic score in patients receiving veno-arterial extracorporeal life support.","authors":"Phillip Weeks,&nbsp;Kelly Dunton,&nbsp;Brian Gulbis,&nbsp;Marwan Jumean,&nbsp;Lisa Janowiak,&nbsp;Igor Banjac,&nbsp;Rajko Radovancevic,&nbsp;Igor Gregoric,&nbsp;Biswajit Kar","doi":"10.1177/03913988231193443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After the initiation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) for hemodynamic support, patients often require vasopressor and inotropic medications to support their blood pressure and cardiac contractility. The vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) is a standardized calculation of vasopressor and inotrope equivalence, which uses coefficients for each medication to calculate a total value. This study evaluated the association between the 30-day survival of patients receiving V-A ECMO support and the VIS calculated 24 h after ECMO cannulation (VIS24). This was a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study. The median VIS24 of the entire cohort was 6.0, and was determined as a cutoff for comparison. Patients with a VIS24 < 6.0 were assigned to a group, and those with a VIS24 ≥ 6.0 were assigned to a second group. Patients with a VIS24 < 6.0 had higher 30-day survival than those with a VIS24 ≥ 6.0 (54.5% vs 41.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.03). The group with a VIS24 < 6.0 also had significantly improved survival to decannulation of ECMO support; however, there was no difference in the survival to hospital discharge. We conducted a secondary analysis of quartiles and determined that individuals with a VIS24 > 11.4 had the lowest survival in the cohort. This finding may help identify patients with the lowest probability of 30-day survival in those receiving V-A ECMO for hemodynamic support.</p>","PeriodicalId":13932,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Artificial Organs","volume":" ","pages":"592-596"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03913988231193443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the initiation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) for hemodynamic support, patients often require vasopressor and inotropic medications to support their blood pressure and cardiac contractility. The vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) is a standardized calculation of vasopressor and inotrope equivalence, which uses coefficients for each medication to calculate a total value. This study evaluated the association between the 30-day survival of patients receiving V-A ECMO support and the VIS calculated 24 h after ECMO cannulation (VIS24). This was a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study. The median VIS24 of the entire cohort was 6.0, and was determined as a cutoff for comparison. Patients with a VIS24 < 6.0 were assigned to a group, and those with a VIS24 ≥ 6.0 were assigned to a second group. Patients with a VIS24 < 6.0 had higher 30-day survival than those with a VIS24 ≥ 6.0 (54.5% vs 41.4%; p = 0.03). The group with a VIS24 < 6.0 also had significantly improved survival to decannulation of ECMO support; however, there was no difference in the survival to hospital discharge. We conducted a secondary analysis of quartiles and determined that individuals with a VIS24 > 11.4 had the lowest survival in the cohort. This finding may help identify patients with the lowest probability of 30-day survival in those receiving V-A ECMO for hemodynamic support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉-动脉体外生命支持患者血管活性-肌力评分生存率的比较。
在开始静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(V-A ECMO)用于血流动力学支持后,患者通常需要血管升压和变力药物来支持他们的血压和心脏收缩力。血管活性变力性评分(VIS)是一种标准化的血管升压药和变力剂等效性计算,它使用每种药物的系数来计算总值。本研究评估了接受V-A ECMO支持的患者的30天生存率与VIS计算值之间的相关性 ECMO插管后h(VIS24)。这是一项单中心、回顾性、观察性队列研究。整个队列的VIS24中位数为6.0,并被确定为比较的截止值。VIS24患者 p = 0.03)。带有VIS24的组  11.4的患者生存率最低。这一发现可能有助于确定接受V-A ECMO血流动力学支持的患者中30天存活概率最低的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Artificial Organs
International Journal of Artificial Organs 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Artificial Organs (IJAO) publishes peer-reviewed research and clinical, experimental and theoretical, contributions to the field of artificial, bioartificial and tissue-engineered organs. The mission of the IJAO is to foster the development and optimization of artificial, bioartificial and tissue-engineered organs, for implantation or use in procedures, to treat functional deficits of all human tissues and organs.
期刊最新文献
Theoretically redesigning peritoneal dialysis products for sustainability: A life cycle inventory approach. Albumin dialysis modeling predicts the impact of polysulfone dialyzers and flow rate on cholic acid and indoxyl sulfate removal. Evaluation of the effect of sarcopenia and frailty on quality of life in older hemodialysis patients. Pro-inflammatory cytokines in response to systemic inflammatory response syndrome post extra-corporeal membrane oxygenator decannulation. Platelet adhesion on hard material coatings and bonding agents for ventricular assist devices in a flow chamber.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1