A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cryoanalgesia for Pain Management following Pectus Excavatum Repair: A Single-Center, Single-Blind, Parallel Design Study.
Gong Min Rim, Hee Kyung Kim, Jung Min Koo, Hyung Joo Park
{"title":"A Randomized Controlled Trial of Cryoanalgesia for Pain Management following Pectus Excavatum Repair: A Single-Center, Single-Blind, Parallel Design Study.","authors":"Gong Min Rim, Hee Kyung Kim, Jung Min Koo, Hyung Joo Park","doi":"10.1055/a-2117-4628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong> Conventional postoperative pain management, with an intravenous patient-controlled approach or thoracic epidural analgesia, has proved suboptimal following a minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. Considering its postulated mechanism of action, we encouraged cryoanalgesia as an effective method for postrepair pain management and a possibly superior alternative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A randomized, single-blind clinical trial was tested on patients undergoing pectus excavatum (PE) repair in March and December 2022. Among 101 patients, consenting study participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: cryoanalgesia (group C, <i>n</i> = 24) or noncryoanalgesia (group N, <i>n</i> = 24). Group N received conventional pain management. Comparing the results, pain levels were measured using the visual analog scale (VAS-R for resting and VAS-D for dynamic) and the total rescue analgesic consumption was determined. Intrathoracic cryoablation was performed bilaterally on the fourth and seventh intercostal nerves using a cryoprobe at -80°C for 2 minutes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The two groups had similar baseline-patient characteristics; however, group C had a longer mean operative time (159 vs. 125 minutes, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and experienced significantly less pain throughout the postoperative course, with VAS at 6 hours (5.38 vs. 7.04, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and 48 hours (3.17 vs. 5.67, <i>p</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Cryoanalgesia improved postoperative pain control at rest and during movement following PE repair. However, the outcome was less favorable than expected because the VAS was greater than 4 (moderate pain), although after a day or two, it decreased to lower levels (VAS < 4) in the cyro group. Considering its extra invasiveness and instrumentation, a routine cryoanalgesia procedure for pectus surgery is yet to be determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":56316,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"338-345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2117-4628","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Conventional postoperative pain management, with an intravenous patient-controlled approach or thoracic epidural analgesia, has proved suboptimal following a minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. Considering its postulated mechanism of action, we encouraged cryoanalgesia as an effective method for postrepair pain management and a possibly superior alternative.
Methods: A randomized, single-blind clinical trial was tested on patients undergoing pectus excavatum (PE) repair in March and December 2022. Among 101 patients, consenting study participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: cryoanalgesia (group C, n = 24) or noncryoanalgesia (group N, n = 24). Group N received conventional pain management. Comparing the results, pain levels were measured using the visual analog scale (VAS-R for resting and VAS-D for dynamic) and the total rescue analgesic consumption was determined. Intrathoracic cryoablation was performed bilaterally on the fourth and seventh intercostal nerves using a cryoprobe at -80°C for 2 minutes.
Results: The two groups had similar baseline-patient characteristics; however, group C had a longer mean operative time (159 vs. 125 minutes, p < 0.01) and experienced significantly less pain throughout the postoperative course, with VAS at 6 hours (5.38 vs. 7.04, p < 0.01) and 48 hours (3.17 vs. 5.67, p < 0.01).
Conclusion: Cryoanalgesia improved postoperative pain control at rest and during movement following PE repair. However, the outcome was less favorable than expected because the VAS was greater than 4 (moderate pain), although after a day or two, it decreased to lower levels (VAS < 4) in the cyro group. Considering its extra invasiveness and instrumentation, a routine cryoanalgesia procedure for pectus surgery is yet to be determined.
导言:传统的术后疼痛治疗,包括静脉注射患者自控方法或胸膜硬膜外镇痛,已被证明是微创修复胸肌后的次优方法。考虑到其假定的作用机制,我们鼓励将低温镇痛作为修复后疼痛治疗的一种有效方法和可能更好的替代方法:方法:我们在 2022 年 3 月和 12 月对接受开胸(PE)修复术的患者进行了随机、单盲临床试验。在101名患者中,征得同意的研究参与者被随机分配到两组中的一组:低温镇痛组(C组,n = 24)或非低温镇痛组(N组,n = 24)。N 组接受常规疼痛治疗。通过视觉模拟量表(静态为 VAS-R,动态为 VAS-D)测量疼痛程度,并确定抢救性镇痛药的总用量。使用低温探针在零下80°C的温度下对双侧第四和第七肋间神经进行了2分钟的胸腔内冷冻消融术:两组患者的基线特征相似,但C组的平均手术时间更长(159分钟对125分钟,P P P P 结论:冷冻镇痛改善了患者的术后状况:低温镇痛改善了 PE 修复术后休息和运动时的疼痛控制。然而,由于 VAS 值大于 4(中度疼痛),尽管一两天后疼痛减轻到较低水平(VAS 值大于 4(中度疼痛)),因此结果没有预期的那么好。
期刊介绍:
This broad-based international journal updates you on vital developments in pediatric surgery through original articles, abstracts of the literature, and meeting announcements.
You will find state-of-the-art information on:
abdominal and thoracic surgery
neurosurgery
urology
gynecology
oncology
orthopaedics
traumatology
anesthesiology
child pathology
embryology
morphology
Written by surgeons, physicians, anesthesiologists, radiologists, and others involved in the surgical care of neonates, infants, and children, the EJPS is an indispensable resource for all specialists.