Feasibility of cabazitaxel in octogenarian prostate cancer patients.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Current Urology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000081
Paolo Tralongo, Sebastiano Bordonaro, Giuseppe Di Lorenzo, Ugo De Giorgi, Nicolò Borsellino, Gaetano Facchini, Sabrina Rossetti, Giuseppe Fornarini, Vito Longo, Antonino Carmelo Tralongo, Francesca Caspani, Massimiliano Spada, Nicola Calvani, Paolo Carlini
{"title":"Feasibility of cabazitaxel in octogenarian prostate cancer patients.","authors":"Paolo Tralongo,&nbsp;Sebastiano Bordonaro,&nbsp;Giuseppe Di Lorenzo,&nbsp;Ugo De Giorgi,&nbsp;Nicolò Borsellino,&nbsp;Gaetano Facchini,&nbsp;Sabrina Rossetti,&nbsp;Giuseppe Fornarini,&nbsp;Vito Longo,&nbsp;Antonino Carmelo Tralongo,&nbsp;Francesca Caspani,&nbsp;Massimiliano Spada,&nbsp;Nicola Calvani,&nbsp;Paolo Carlini","doi":"10.1097/CU9.0000000000000081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cabazitaxel in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients aged ≥80 years, we performed a retrospective study on a sample of patients from 11 Italian cancer centers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-seven patients aged ≥80 years were treated with cabazitaxel after previous failure with docetaxel; 39 completed a comprehensive geriatric assessment questionnaire (34 fit and 5 vulnerable) and 8 patients (14%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) ≥2, while most had a PS of 0-1 (86%). Cabazitaxel was administered at a dose of 25 mg/m<sup>2</sup> in 30 (52%) patients and 20 mg/m<sup>2</sup> or adapted schedules in 27 (48%) patients. These schedules were adopted mainly in patients ≥85 years (75%), with a PS ≥2 (87.5%), and those classified as vulnerable (100%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The duration of treatment was 4.8 months and was comparable in all subgroups; disease control rate was reported in 36 patients (63%); prostate-specific antigen response was recorded in 18 patients (31.5%). Median overall survival was 13.1 months regardless of age (<85/≥85 years), but overall survival was reduced in vulnerable (7.2 months) and PS ≥ 2 patients (6.8 months). The most frequently documented grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (14%) and diarrhea (10.5%). Six patients (10.5%) dropped out due to severe toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Octogenarian patients can be treated with cabazitaxel with reduced doses or alternative schedules that are associated with less toxicity and fewer treatment interruptions. Comprehensive geriatric assessment could facilitate more appropriate patient selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":39147,"journal":{"name":"Current Urology","volume":"17 3","pages":"153-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1e/5c/curr-urol-17-153.PMC10337820.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of cabazitaxel in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients aged ≥80 years, we performed a retrospective study on a sample of patients from 11 Italian cancer centers.

Materials and methods: Fifty-seven patients aged ≥80 years were treated with cabazitaxel after previous failure with docetaxel; 39 completed a comprehensive geriatric assessment questionnaire (34 fit and 5 vulnerable) and 8 patients (14%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) ≥2, while most had a PS of 0-1 (86%). Cabazitaxel was administered at a dose of 25 mg/m2 in 30 (52%) patients and 20 mg/m2 or adapted schedules in 27 (48%) patients. These schedules were adopted mainly in patients ≥85 years (75%), with a PS ≥2 (87.5%), and those classified as vulnerable (100%).

Results: The duration of treatment was 4.8 months and was comparable in all subgroups; disease control rate was reported in 36 patients (63%); prostate-specific antigen response was recorded in 18 patients (31.5%). Median overall survival was 13.1 months regardless of age (<85/≥85 years), but overall survival was reduced in vulnerable (7.2 months) and PS ≥ 2 patients (6.8 months). The most frequently documented grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (14%) and diarrhea (10.5%). Six patients (10.5%) dropped out due to severe toxicity.

Conclusions: Octogenarian patients can be treated with cabazitaxel with reduced doses or alternative schedules that are associated with less toxicity and fewer treatment interruptions. Comprehensive geriatric assessment could facilitate more appropriate patient selection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡巴他赛治疗80岁前列腺癌患者的可行性。
背景:为了评估卡巴他赛治疗年龄≥80岁的去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的有效性和安全性,我们对来自意大利11个癌症中心的患者样本进行了回顾性研究。材料与方法:57例年龄≥80岁的患者在既往多西他赛治疗失败后接受卡巴他赛治疗;39例患者完成了老年综合评估问卷(健康34例,脆弱5例),8例患者(14%)的东部肿瘤合作组绩效状态(PS)≥2,大部分患者(86%)的PS为0-1。30例(52%)患者给予卡巴他赛25mg /m2的剂量,27例(48%)患者给予20mg /m2或调整方案。这些方案主要适用于≥85岁(75%)、PS≥2(87.5%)和易感患者(100%)。结果:治疗时间为4.8个月,各亚组间具有可比性;36例(63%)患者报告疾病控制率;18例患者(31.5%)出现前列腺特异性抗原应答。中位总生存期为13.1个月,与年龄无关(结论:80多岁患者可以用卡巴他赛减少剂量或替代方案治疗,毒性更小,治疗中断更少。全面的老年评估可以促进更合适的患者选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Urology
Current Urology Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
期刊最新文献
Bilateral nephrolithiasis and upper tract transitional cell carcinoma in horseshoe kidney. Visual guidelines and tutoring in pediatric urological surgery. Hypoxia activates the hypoxia-inducible factor-1α/vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in a prostatic stromal cell line: A mechanism for the pathogenesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia Comparison of midurethral tape with autologous rectus fascial sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis Partial versus radical nephrectomy for T1b renal cell carcinoma: A comparison of efficacy and prognostic factors based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1