The Immunomodulatory Effects of Dexamethasone on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY Oncology and Therapy Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1007/s40487-023-00235-6
Kai Conrad Cecil Johnson, Daniel Goldstein, Jasmin Tharakan, Dionisia Quiroga, Mahmoud Kassem, Michael Grimm, Abdul Miah, Craig Vargo, Michael Berger, Preeti Sudheendra, Ashley Pariser, Margaret E Gatti-Mays, Nicole Williams, Daniel Stover, Sagar Sardesai, Robert Wesolowski, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Gary Tozbikian, Patrick M Schnell, Mathew A Cherian
{"title":"The Immunomodulatory Effects of Dexamethasone on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.","authors":"Kai Conrad Cecil Johnson,&nbsp;Daniel Goldstein,&nbsp;Jasmin Tharakan,&nbsp;Dionisia Quiroga,&nbsp;Mahmoud Kassem,&nbsp;Michael Grimm,&nbsp;Abdul Miah,&nbsp;Craig Vargo,&nbsp;Michael Berger,&nbsp;Preeti Sudheendra,&nbsp;Ashley Pariser,&nbsp;Margaret E Gatti-Mays,&nbsp;Nicole Williams,&nbsp;Daniel Stover,&nbsp;Sagar Sardesai,&nbsp;Robert Wesolowski,&nbsp;Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy,&nbsp;Gary Tozbikian,&nbsp;Patrick M Schnell,&nbsp;Mathew A Cherian","doi":"10.1007/s40487-023-00235-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The immunomodulatory impact of corticosteroids and concurrent chemotherapy is poorly understood within triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). On a biochemical level, steroids have been linked to the signaling of chemotherapy-resistant pathways. However, on a clinical level, steroids play an essential role in chemotherapy tolerance through the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and hypersensitivity reactions. Given these conflicting roles, we wanted to evaluate this interplay more rigorously in the context of early-stage TNBC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with operable TNBC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) between January 2012 and November 2018, with the primary goal of examining the dose-dependent relationship between pathological complete response (pCR) rates and corticosteroid use. Secondary endpoints included the impact of steroid dosing on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), along with a breakdown in pCR rates based on steroid doses provided during each chemotherapy phase. Further adjusted analyses were performed based on patient age, diabetic status, and anatomical stage. Finally, we explored the relationship between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) seen on tissue samples at baseline and dexamethasone doses in terms of pCR rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, of the 174 patients screened within this study period, 116 met full eligibility criteria. Of these eligible patients, all were female, with a median age of 51.5 years (27.0 to 74.0) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.7 [standard deviation (SD) 7.04]. The majority were nondiabetic (80.2%). For cancer stage, 69.8% (n = 81) had stage 2 breast cancer. We found no statistically significant association between pCR rates and dexamethasone use, both in terms of the total dose (p = 0.55) and mean dose per NAC cycle (p = 0.74). Similarly, no difference was noted when adjusting for diabetic status, metformin use, or age at diagnosis, regardless of the total steroid dose provided (p = 0.72) or mean dose per cycle (p = 0.49). No meaningful changes to pCR rate were seen with higher mean or higher total steroid doses during the paclitaxel (T) phase (adjusted p = 0.16 and p = 0.76, respectively) or doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) phase (adjusted p = 0.83 and p = 0.77, respectively). Furthermore, we found no clinically significant association between dexamethasone dose and either RFS (p = 0.45) or OS (p = 0.89). Of the 56 patients who had available pre-treatment biopsy tissue samples, 27 achieved pCR, with higher TILs at baseline being associated with higher pCR rates, regardless of the mean dexamethasone dose used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that dexamethasone has no clinically significant impact on pCR, RFS, or OS when given concurrently with NAC in patients with curative TNBC, regardless of diabetic status.</p>","PeriodicalId":44205,"journal":{"name":"Oncology and Therapy","volume":"11 3","pages":"361-374"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6e/86/40487_2023_Article_235.PMC10447758.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40487-023-00235-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The immunomodulatory impact of corticosteroids and concurrent chemotherapy is poorly understood within triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). On a biochemical level, steroids have been linked to the signaling of chemotherapy-resistant pathways. However, on a clinical level, steroids play an essential role in chemotherapy tolerance through the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and hypersensitivity reactions. Given these conflicting roles, we wanted to evaluate this interplay more rigorously in the context of early-stage TNBC.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with operable TNBC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) between January 2012 and November 2018, with the primary goal of examining the dose-dependent relationship between pathological complete response (pCR) rates and corticosteroid use. Secondary endpoints included the impact of steroid dosing on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), along with a breakdown in pCR rates based on steroid doses provided during each chemotherapy phase. Further adjusted analyses were performed based on patient age, diabetic status, and anatomical stage. Finally, we explored the relationship between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) seen on tissue samples at baseline and dexamethasone doses in terms of pCR rates.

Results: In total, of the 174 patients screened within this study period, 116 met full eligibility criteria. Of these eligible patients, all were female, with a median age of 51.5 years (27.0 to 74.0) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.7 [standard deviation (SD) 7.04]. The majority were nondiabetic (80.2%). For cancer stage, 69.8% (n = 81) had stage 2 breast cancer. We found no statistically significant association between pCR rates and dexamethasone use, both in terms of the total dose (p = 0.55) and mean dose per NAC cycle (p = 0.74). Similarly, no difference was noted when adjusting for diabetic status, metformin use, or age at diagnosis, regardless of the total steroid dose provided (p = 0.72) or mean dose per cycle (p = 0.49). No meaningful changes to pCR rate were seen with higher mean or higher total steroid doses during the paclitaxel (T) phase (adjusted p = 0.16 and p = 0.76, respectively) or doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) phase (adjusted p = 0.83 and p = 0.77, respectively). Furthermore, we found no clinically significant association between dexamethasone dose and either RFS (p = 0.45) or OS (p = 0.89). Of the 56 patients who had available pre-treatment biopsy tissue samples, 27 achieved pCR, with higher TILs at baseline being associated with higher pCR rates, regardless of the mean dexamethasone dose used.

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that dexamethasone has no clinically significant impact on pCR, RFS, or OS when given concurrently with NAC in patients with curative TNBC, regardless of diabetic status.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地塞米松对三阴性乳腺癌新辅助化疗的免疫调节作用。
在三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)中,皮质类固醇和同步化疗的免疫调节作用尚不清楚。在生化水平上,类固醇与化疗耐药途径的信号传导有关。然而,在临床水平上,类固醇通过预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)和过敏反应在化疗耐受中发挥重要作用。鉴于这些相互冲突的角色,我们希望在早期TNBC的背景下更严格地评估这种相互作用。方法:我们对2012年1月至2018年11月期间接受新辅助化疗(NAC)的可手术TNBC患者进行回顾性分析,主要目的是研究病理完全缓解(pCR)率与皮质类固醇使用之间的剂量依赖关系。次要终点包括类固醇剂量对总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)的影响,以及基于每个化疗阶段提供的类固醇剂量的pCR率分解。根据患者年龄、糖尿病状态和解剖分期进行进一步调整分析。最后,我们探讨了肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(til)在基线和地塞米松剂量下组织样本上的pCR率之间的关系。结果:在本研究期间筛选的174例患者中,116例完全符合资格标准。符合条件的患者均为女性,中位年龄为51.5岁(27.0 ~ 74.0),平均体重指数(BMI)为29.7[标准差(SD) 7.04]。大多数为非糖尿病患者(80.2%)。在癌症分期方面,69.8% (n = 81)为2期乳腺癌。我们发现pCR率和地塞米松使用之间没有统计学意义的关联,无论是在总剂量(p = 0.55)和每个NAC周期的平均剂量(p = 0.74)方面。同样,在调整糖尿病状态、二甲双胍使用情况或诊断年龄时,无论提供的类固醇总剂量(p = 0.72)或每周期平均剂量(p = 0.49)如何,也没有发现差异。在紫杉醇(T)期(调整后的p = 0.16和p = 0.76)或阿霉素和环磷酰胺(AC)期(调整后的p = 0.83和p = 0.77),较高的平均或总类固醇剂量对pCR率没有显著变化。此外,我们发现地塞米松剂量与RFS (p = 0.45)或OS (p = 0.89)之间没有临床意义的关联。在56例可获得治疗前活检组织样本的患者中,27例获得pCR,无论使用的平均地塞米松剂量如何,基线时较高的TILs与较高的pCR率相关。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在治疗性TNBC患者中,无论是否患有糖尿病,当与NAC同时给予地塞米松时,地塞米松对pCR、RFS或OS没有临床显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now indexed in PubMed Aims and Scope Oncology and Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality pre-clinical, clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Oncology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research. Rapid Publication The journal’s rapid publication timelines aim for a peer review decision within 2 weeks of submission. If an article is accepted it will be published online 3-4 weeks from acceptance. These rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who closely manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with rapid peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model this allows for the rapid and efficient communication of the latest research and reviews, allowing the advancement of clinical therapies. Personal Service The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning that authors will always have a personal point of contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE, GPP and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. We also encourage pre-submission enquiries and are always happy to provide a confidential assessment of manuscripts. Digital features and plain language summaries Oncology and Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’. Preprints We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors'' or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals. Please see here for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550 Peer Review Process Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria. At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviewer recommendations are conflicted, the editorial board will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed). Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case by case basis and should be sent to the journal editor. Copyright Oncology and Therapy''s content is published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 Publication Fees Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of £3650/€4500/$5100. The journal will consider fee discounts for developing countries and this is decided on a case by case basis. Open Access All articles published by Oncology and Therapy are published open access Contact For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact managing editor Lydia Alborn at lydia.alborn@springer.com.
期刊最新文献
Long-Term Temporal Trends of Real-World Healthcare Costs Associated with Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab and Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib as First-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Pexidartinib Upfront in a Case of Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor: Proof of Concept for a Treatment Paradigm Shift. Some Considerations on the Treatment and Prognosis of the Most Common Malignant Tumors of the Larynx. Causal Relationship Between Gut Microbiota and Leukemia: Future Perspectives. Exploring the Potential of Ellagic Acid in Gastrointestinal Cancer Prevention: Recent Advances and Future Directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1