Strategic use of tobacco treatment specialists as an innovation for tobacco cessation health systems change within health care organizations.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Care Management Review Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-08 DOI:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000380
Ashlyn Burns, Jyotsna Gutta, Harold Kooreman, Miranda Spitznagle, Valerie A Yeager
{"title":"Strategic use of tobacco treatment specialists as an innovation for tobacco cessation health systems change within health care organizations.","authors":"Ashlyn Burns, Jyotsna Gutta, Harold Kooreman, Miranda Spitznagle, Valerie A Yeager","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tobacco screening interventions have demonstrated effectiveness at improving population health, yet many people who want to quit using tobacco lack access to professional assistance. One way to address this gap is to train members of the clinical team as tobacco treatment specialists (TTSs).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to understand how TTSs have been used across a variety of health care organizations implementing health systems change for tobacco treatment and examine the sustainability of TTSs as a health systems change innovation for tobacco cessation.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This study used qualitative interviews ( n = 25) to identify themes related to implementing TTSs as a health systems change innovation and examined these themes within the constructs of the theory of innovation implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Insights about implementing TTSs as an innovation primarily aligned with four theoretical constructs: implementation policies and practices, implementation climate, innovation-values fit, and implementation effectiveness. Specific themes were perceived to facilitate the sustainability of TTSs including team-based TTS efforts, widespread awareness of TTS roles, leadership buy-in, and recognized value of TTS services. Barriers to sustainability included inadequate resources (e.g., time and staff), lack of tracking outcomes, inappropriate referrals, and lack of reimbursement.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Health care organizations planning to implement health systems change for tobacco cessation can encourage committed use of TTSs as an innovation by considering the insights provided in this study. These primarily related to five overarching implementation considerations: staff selection and training, tracking and dissemination of impacts, adequate resources, referrals and workflow, and billing and reimbursement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tobacco screening interventions have demonstrated effectiveness at improving population health, yet many people who want to quit using tobacco lack access to professional assistance. One way to address this gap is to train members of the clinical team as tobacco treatment specialists (TTSs).

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to understand how TTSs have been used across a variety of health care organizations implementing health systems change for tobacco treatment and examine the sustainability of TTSs as a health systems change innovation for tobacco cessation.

Methodology: This study used qualitative interviews ( n = 25) to identify themes related to implementing TTSs as a health systems change innovation and examined these themes within the constructs of the theory of innovation implementation.

Results: Insights about implementing TTSs as an innovation primarily aligned with four theoretical constructs: implementation policies and practices, implementation climate, innovation-values fit, and implementation effectiveness. Specific themes were perceived to facilitate the sustainability of TTSs including team-based TTS efforts, widespread awareness of TTS roles, leadership buy-in, and recognized value of TTS services. Barriers to sustainability included inadequate resources (e.g., time and staff), lack of tracking outcomes, inappropriate referrals, and lack of reimbursement.

Practice implications: Health care organizations planning to implement health systems change for tobacco cessation can encourage committed use of TTSs as an innovation by considering the insights provided in this study. These primarily related to five overarching implementation considerations: staff selection and training, tracking and dissemination of impacts, adequate resources, referrals and workflow, and billing and reimbursement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战略性地使用烟草治疗专家,作为卫生保健组织内戒烟卫生系统变革的一项创新。
背景:烟草筛查干预措施已证明在改善人群健康方面是有效的,但许多想要戒烟的人缺乏专业援助。解决这一差距的一种方法是将临床团队成员培训为烟草治疗专家(TTS)。目的:本研究的目的是了解TTS是如何在实施烟草治疗卫生系统变革的各种医疗保健组织中使用的,并检查TTS作为戒烟卫生系统变革创新的可持续性。方法:本研究使用定性访谈(n=25)来确定与实施TTS作为卫生系统变革创新相关的主题,并在创新实施理论的框架内检验这些主题。结果:关于将TTS作为一种创新实施的见解主要符合四个理论结构:实施政策和实践、实施环境、创新价值观契合度和实施有效性。特定主题被认为有助于TTS的可持续性,包括基于团队的TTS工作、对TTS角色的广泛认识、领导层的认可以及TTS服务的公认价值。可持续性的障碍包括资源不足(如时间和人员)、缺乏跟踪结果、不适当的推荐和缺乏报销。实践意义:计划实施戒烟卫生系统变革的卫生保健组织可以通过考虑本研究中提供的见解,鼓励将TTS作为一种创新。这些主要涉及五个总体实施考虑因素:工作人员的选择和培训、影响的跟踪和传播、充足的资源、转介和工作流程以及计费和报销。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
期刊最新文献
Health care management and the patient experience. Stanford Network for Advancement and Promotion: The impact of a community building-focused leadership development program on the success of underrepresented groups in academic medicine. Exploring barriers to employee voice among certified nursing assistants: A qualitative study. Good therapeutic connections and patient psychological safety: A qualitative survey study. Validating perceptions with clinical measures: A latent growth curve on the associations between patient experience and hospital-associated infections in Norway over time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1