Evaluating the Accuracy of Dental Restorations Manufactured by Two CAD/CAM Milling Systems and Their Prototypes Fabricated by 3D Printing Methods: An In Vitro Study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Prosthodontics Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.11607/ijp.7633
Ali Alenezi, Mohammed Yehya
{"title":"Evaluating the Accuracy of Dental Restorations Manufactured by Two CAD/CAM Milling Systems and Their Prototypes Fabricated by 3D Printing Methods: An In Vitro Study","authors":"Ali Alenezi,&nbsp;Mohammed Yehya","doi":"10.11607/ijp.7633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the marginal accuracy of all-ceramic onlay restorations and prototypes fabricated using additive and subtractive methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ten typodont first molars were prepared and scanned two times using two different scanners: ARCTICA AutoScan (KaVo Dental) and CEREC Omnicam (Dentsply Sirona). The two groups of virtual models were used to design two groups of virtual onlay restorations using two different CAD software (n = 10 each group) and exported in STL files. Each group of STL files was converted to physical onlay restorations and prototypes by using three different methods; these included two additive manufacturing techniques, stereolithography apparatus (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP), and one subtractive technique, e.max milling using the KaVo Everest system and the Dentsply Sirona inLab MC X5. A digital microscope was used to evaluate the marginal fit around the onlay restorations or prototypes on the typodont teeth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All evaluated groups showed mean marginal gaps between 59 and 84 µm. No statistically significant differences were found when comparing the marginal accuracy of onlay restorations fabricated by the subtractive method and onlay prototypes from the two additive methods, SLA (P = .70) and DLP (P = .21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All the models evaluated produced marginal gaps within the reported acceptable clinical range. Thus, these subtractive and additive methods may be considered suitable for onlay restoration production.</p>","PeriodicalId":50292,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","volume":"36 3","pages":"293-300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7633","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose: This in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the marginal accuracy of all-ceramic onlay restorations and prototypes fabricated using additive and subtractive methods.

Materials and methods: Ten typodont first molars were prepared and scanned two times using two different scanners: ARCTICA AutoScan (KaVo Dental) and CEREC Omnicam (Dentsply Sirona). The two groups of virtual models were used to design two groups of virtual onlay restorations using two different CAD software (n = 10 each group) and exported in STL files. Each group of STL files was converted to physical onlay restorations and prototypes by using three different methods; these included two additive manufacturing techniques, stereolithography apparatus (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP), and one subtractive technique, e.max milling using the KaVo Everest system and the Dentsply Sirona inLab MC X5. A digital microscope was used to evaluate the marginal fit around the onlay restorations or prototypes on the typodont teeth.

Results: All evaluated groups showed mean marginal gaps between 59 and 84 µm. No statistically significant differences were found when comparing the marginal accuracy of onlay restorations fabricated by the subtractive method and onlay prototypes from the two additive methods, SLA (P = .70) and DLP (P = .21).

Conclusion: All the models evaluated produced marginal gaps within the reported acceptable clinical range. Thus, these subtractive and additive methods may be considered suitable for onlay restoration production.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估两种CAD/CAM铣削系统制造的牙修复体及其3D打印方法制造的原型的准确性:一项体外研究
目的:通过体外研究,评价采用加减法制作的全瓷嵌体修复体和原型的边缘精度。材料和方法:制备10颗排印型第一磨牙,使用ARCTICA AutoScan (KaVo Dental)和CEREC Omnicam (Dentsply Sirona)两种不同的扫描仪进行两次扫描。将两组虚拟模型分别使用两种不同的CAD软件(每组n = 10)设计两组虚拟平面修复体,并导出为STL文件。采用三种不同的方法将每组STL文件转换为物理还原和原型;其中包括两种增材制造技术,立体光刻设备(SLA)和数字光处理(DLP),以及一种减法技术,即使用KaVo Everest系统和Dentsply Sirona inLab MC X5的e.max铣削。采用数码显微镜对印字齿上嵌体修复体或原型体周围的边缘贴合进行评价。结果:所有评估组的平均边缘间隙在59 ~ 84µm之间。两种加性方法(SLA = 0.70)和DLP (P = 0.21)对减法和加性方法制作的牙体原型的边缘精度进行比较,差异无统计学意义。结论:所有评估的模型在报告的可接受的临床范围内产生了边际间隙。因此,这些减法和加法可被认为适用于纯还原生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Prosthodontics
International Journal of Prosthodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Association for Osseointegration (EAO), the International College of Prosthodontists (ICP), the German Society of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science (DGPro), and the Italian Academy of Prosthetic Dentistry (AIOP) Prosthodontics demands a clinical research emphasis on patient- and dentist-mediated concerns in the management of oral rehabilitation needs. It is about making and implementing the best clinical decisions to enhance patients'' quality of life via applied biologic architecture - a role that far exceeds that of traditional prosthetic dentistry, with its emphasis on materials and techniques. The International Journal of Prosthodontics is dedicated to exploring and developing this conceptual shift in the role of today''s prosthodontist, clinician, and educator alike. The editorial board is composed of a distinguished team of leading international scholars.
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Abutment Screw Loosening in 24-Degree Angulation-Correcting and Straight Implants: An In Vitro Study. Analysis of Topography, Flexural Strength, and Microstructure of a Lithium Disilicate Glass- Ceramic after Surface Finishing. Aging and Fracture Resistance of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Molar Crowns Fabricated from Lithium Disilicate Containing Virgilite. Comparison Between Interocclusal Registration Using Silicone Bite Registration Material and Intraoral Scanner on Clenching Strength. Satisfaction with Labial Reinforcement of Custom-Made Mouthguards Among a Cohort of Rugby Union Players: A Randomized Crossover Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1