Mechanical Washing Prevents Transmission of Bacterial, Viral, and Protozoal Murine Pathogens from Cages.

IF 1.2 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000105
Amanda C Ritter, Rodolfo J Ricart Arbona, Anthony J Mourino, Michael B Palillo, Mert Aydin, James R Fahey, Neil S Lipman
{"title":"Mechanical Washing Prevents Transmission of Bacterial, Viral, and Protozoal Murine Pathogens from Cages.","authors":"Amanda C Ritter,&nbsp;Rodolfo J Ricart Arbona,&nbsp;Anthony J Mourino,&nbsp;Michael B Palillo,&nbsp;Mert Aydin,&nbsp;James R Fahey,&nbsp;Neil S Lipman","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infectious agents have varying susceptibilities to thermal inactivation and/or mechanical removal from cages by the use of heated, pressurized water. In this study, we tested whether 5 specific infectious organisms (<i>Candidatus savagella</i> [segmented filamentous bacterium (SFB)], <i>Helicobacter</i> sp., mouse norovirus (MNV), <i>Tritrichomonas</i> sp., and <i>Entamoeba muris</i>) could survive the cage wash process and still infect naïve mice. These 5 organisms were chosen due to their prevalence in rodent colonies, environmental stability, and/or potential to influence experimental outcomes. Cages that had housed mice shedding all 5 organisms were assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: 1) sanitization in a tunnel washer followed by autoclaving (121 °C [250 °F] for 20 min; <i>n</i> = 40 cages); 2) sanitization in a tunnel washer (82 °C [180 °F] for an average of 30 s; <i>n</i> = 40 cages); or 3) control (bedding change only; <i>n</i> = 40 cages). The presence of these agents in the cage was assessed by performing PCR on swabs of the empty soiled cage interior before and after the treatment. In addition, to determine if any residual nucleic acid was infectious, 2 Swiss outbred (J:ARC(S)) female mice were housed for 7 d in cages from each treatment group. The above procedures were then repeated so that every week each pair of J:ARC(S) mice ( <i>n</i> = 10 pairs of mice/treatment group) were housed in another cage that underwent the same treatment; this was done for a total of 4 consecutive, 1-wk-long periods. Swabs collected from soiled cages were PCR-positive for SFB, <i>Helicobacter</i>, MNV, <i>Tritrichomonas</i>, and <i>Entamoeba</i> in 99%, 97%, 39%, 63%, and 73% of the cages tested, respectively. Cages in the tunnel wash group that were PCR-positive for SFB, <i>Helicobacter</i>, <i>Tritrichomonas</i>, and <i>Entamoeba</i> before treatment remained PCR-positive in 8%, 15%, 43%, and 10% of positive cages, respectively. None of the cages from the autoclave group were PCR-positive for any of the agents after treatment. None of the mice housed in cages in either the autoclave or tunnel wash groups became infected with any of the agents. However, 80%, 60%, and 100% of the pairs of mice housed in untreated cages were PCR-positive for SFB, MNV, and <i>Entamoeba</i>, respectively. None of the mice housed in untreated cages were positive for <i>Helicobacter</i> or <i>Tritrichomonas</i>. Our results suggest that nucleic acids from these bacterial and protozoal organisms may remain in cages after mechanical cage washing, but these nucleic acids are not infectious, and autoclaving is not necessary to prevent transmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":50019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10078927/pdf/jaalas2023000131.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-22-000105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infectious agents have varying susceptibilities to thermal inactivation and/or mechanical removal from cages by the use of heated, pressurized water. In this study, we tested whether 5 specific infectious organisms (Candidatus savagella [segmented filamentous bacterium (SFB)], Helicobacter sp., mouse norovirus (MNV), Tritrichomonas sp., and Entamoeba muris) could survive the cage wash process and still infect naïve mice. These 5 organisms were chosen due to their prevalence in rodent colonies, environmental stability, and/or potential to influence experimental outcomes. Cages that had housed mice shedding all 5 organisms were assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: 1) sanitization in a tunnel washer followed by autoclaving (121 °C [250 °F] for 20 min; n = 40 cages); 2) sanitization in a tunnel washer (82 °C [180 °F] for an average of 30 s; n = 40 cages); or 3) control (bedding change only; n = 40 cages). The presence of these agents in the cage was assessed by performing PCR on swabs of the empty soiled cage interior before and after the treatment. In addition, to determine if any residual nucleic acid was infectious, 2 Swiss outbred (J:ARC(S)) female mice were housed for 7 d in cages from each treatment group. The above procedures were then repeated so that every week each pair of J:ARC(S) mice ( n = 10 pairs of mice/treatment group) were housed in another cage that underwent the same treatment; this was done for a total of 4 consecutive, 1-wk-long periods. Swabs collected from soiled cages were PCR-positive for SFB, Helicobacter, MNV, Tritrichomonas, and Entamoeba in 99%, 97%, 39%, 63%, and 73% of the cages tested, respectively. Cages in the tunnel wash group that were PCR-positive for SFB, Helicobacter, Tritrichomonas, and Entamoeba before treatment remained PCR-positive in 8%, 15%, 43%, and 10% of positive cages, respectively. None of the cages from the autoclave group were PCR-positive for any of the agents after treatment. None of the mice housed in cages in either the autoclave or tunnel wash groups became infected with any of the agents. However, 80%, 60%, and 100% of the pairs of mice housed in untreated cages were PCR-positive for SFB, MNV, and Entamoeba, respectively. None of the mice housed in untreated cages were positive for Helicobacter or Tritrichomonas. Our results suggest that nucleic acids from these bacterial and protozoal organisms may remain in cages after mechanical cage washing, but these nucleic acids are not infectious, and autoclaving is not necessary to prevent transmission.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机械清洗可以防止细菌、病毒和原生动物从笼子中传播。
传染性病原体对热灭活和/或通过使用加热加压水从笼中机械移除具有不同的敏感性。在这项研究中,我们测试了5种特定的感染性生物(Candidatus savagella [segmented filous bacterium (SFB)], Helicobacter sp., mouse norovirus (MNV), Tritrichomonas sp.和Entamoeba muris)是否能够在笼子清洗过程中存活并仍然感染naïve小鼠。选择这5种微生物的原因是它们在啮齿动物群体中的流行程度、环境稳定性和/或影响实验结果的潜力。饲养了所有5种细菌脱落的小鼠的笼子被分配到3个处理组中的一个:1)在隧道洗衣机中消毒,然后高压灭菌(121°C[250°F]) 20分钟;N = 40笼);2)在隧道式洗衣机(82°C[180°F])中消毒,平均30秒;N = 40笼);或3)控制(仅更换床上用品;N = 40笼)。在处理前和处理后,通过对空脏污笼内部拭子进行PCR检测,评估笼中是否存在这些试剂。此外,为了确定是否有残留的核酸具有传染性,在每个处理组中取2只瑞士近交种(J:ARC(S))雌性小鼠,在笼子中饲养7 d。然后重复上述步骤,以便每周将每对J:ARC(S)小鼠(n = 10对/处理组)置于另一个进行相同处理的笼子中;这项研究共进行了4次连续1周的研究。从污染网箱收集的拭子pcr检测结果分别为99%、97%、39%、63%和73%的网箱SFB、幽门螺杆菌、MNV、毛单胞菌和内阿米巴原虫阳性。隧道冲洗组治疗前SFB、幽门螺杆菌、毛单胞菌和内阿米巴虫pcr阳性的笼分别在8%、15%、43%和10%的阳性笼中保持pcr阳性。处理后,高压灭菌组的笼中没有任何一种试剂的pcr阳性。在高压灭菌或隧道清洗组的笼子里,没有一只老鼠感染任何一种病原体。然而,在未经处理的笼子中饲养的小鼠中,分别有80%、60%和100%的小鼠对SFB、MNV和内阿米巴呈pcr阳性。在未经处理的笼子中饲养的小鼠没有幽门螺杆菌或毛滴虫阳性。我们的研究结果表明,这些细菌和原生动物的核酸可能在机械笼清洗后仍留在笼中,但这些核酸不具有传染性,并且不需要高压灭菌来防止传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
35.30%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (JAALAS) serves as an official communication vehicle for the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science (AALAS). The journal includes a section of refereed articles and a section of AALAS association news. All signed articles, including refereed articles and book reviews, editorials, committee reports, and news and commentary, reflect the individual views of the authors and are not official views of AALAS. The mission of the refereed section of the journal is to disseminate high-quality, peer-reviewed information on animal biology, technology, facility operations, management, and compliance as relevant to the AALAS membership. JAALAS accepts research reports (data-based) or scholarly reports (literature-based), with the caveat that all articles, including solicited manuscripts, must include appropriate references and must undergo peer review.
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Intranasal Administration of Polymeric Biodegradable Films in C57bl/6 Mice. Comparison of Systemic Extended-release Buprenorphine and Local Extended-release Bupivacaine-Meloxicam as Analgesics for Laparotomy in Mice. Equipment and Methods for Concurrently Housing Germfree and Gnotobiotic Mice in the Same Room. Evaluation of Rodent Diet Stability when Stored in Conditions that Diverge from Guide Parameters. Behavioral Evaluation of Laboratory-housed Ferrets (Mustela Putorius Furo) in Different Enclosure Sizes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1