Implementation of a Structured Process for Clinically Indicated Testing for Clostridioides difficile Infections in Pediatric Oncology and Stem Cell Transplant.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1177/27527530221140063
Molly Kusma, Jeanne Little, Larry Kociolek
{"title":"Implementation of a Structured Process for Clinically Indicated Testing for <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Infections in Pediatric Oncology and Stem Cell Transplant.","authors":"Molly Kusma,&nbsp;Jeanne Little,&nbsp;Larry Kociolek","doi":"10.1177/27527530221140063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> (<i>C. difficile</i>) is the primary cause of healthcare-associated infectious diarrhea. Pediatric patients with oncology and stem cell transplant (SCT) diagnoses are at greater risk of <i>C. difficile</i> infections (CDI) and <i>C. difficile</i> colonization than those without. Misdiagnosis of <i>C. difficile</i> colonization as infection and subsequent unnecessary treatment can lead to antibiotic resistance, increased healthcare costs, and an overestimation of CDI rates. <b>Methods:</b> A best practice advisory (BPA) was built into the electronic medical record to guide decision making regarding clinically indicated <i>C. difficile</i> testing. Tests for CDI were to be sent only if the patient met all the predefined clinical criteria for testing. The number of CDI tests ordered per 1,000 patient days, the number of tests positive per 1,000 patient days, and the proportion of positive tests were compared before and after implementation. <b>Results:</b> The number of tests ordered per 1,000 patient days declined from 8.2 to 5.7 after the intervention. Positive tests per 1,000 patient days increased from 2.2 to 3.5 after the intervention. This demonstrates an increase in the proportion of positive tests from 27% to 61%. <b>Discussion:</b> This intervention led to fewer CDI tests ordered, but CDI incidence and test positivity proportion increased. This is likely reflective of better-targeted testing for CDI and the identification of true-positive cases of infection, but we cannot rule out a coincident increase in CDI activity during the study period. Through education and electronic reminders of the clinical indicators for testing for CDI, the frequency of testing for <i>C. difficile</i> was reduced.</p>","PeriodicalId":29692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27527530221140063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is the primary cause of healthcare-associated infectious diarrhea. Pediatric patients with oncology and stem cell transplant (SCT) diagnoses are at greater risk of C. difficile infections (CDI) and C. difficile colonization than those without. Misdiagnosis of C. difficile colonization as infection and subsequent unnecessary treatment can lead to antibiotic resistance, increased healthcare costs, and an overestimation of CDI rates. Methods: A best practice advisory (BPA) was built into the electronic medical record to guide decision making regarding clinically indicated C. difficile testing. Tests for CDI were to be sent only if the patient met all the predefined clinical criteria for testing. The number of CDI tests ordered per 1,000 patient days, the number of tests positive per 1,000 patient days, and the proportion of positive tests were compared before and after implementation. Results: The number of tests ordered per 1,000 patient days declined from 8.2 to 5.7 after the intervention. Positive tests per 1,000 patient days increased from 2.2 to 3.5 after the intervention. This demonstrates an increase in the proportion of positive tests from 27% to 61%. Discussion: This intervention led to fewer CDI tests ordered, but CDI incidence and test positivity proportion increased. This is likely reflective of better-targeted testing for CDI and the identification of true-positive cases of infection, but we cannot rule out a coincident increase in CDI activity during the study period. Through education and electronic reminders of the clinical indicators for testing for CDI, the frequency of testing for C. difficile was reduced.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在儿科肿瘤和干细胞移植中艰难梭菌感染临床指示性检测的结构化过程的实施。
背景:艰难梭菌(C. difficile)是卫生保健相关感染性腹泻的主要原因。接受肿瘤和干细胞移植(SCT)诊断的儿科患者比没有接受肿瘤和干细胞移植的儿童更容易发生艰难梭菌感染(CDI)和艰难梭菌定植。将艰难梭菌定植误诊为感染和随后的不必要治疗可导致抗生素耐药性,增加医疗保健费用,并高估CDI率。方法:在电子病历中建立最佳实践咨询(BPA),以指导临床适应症艰难梭菌检测的决策。只有在患者符合所有预先确定的临床检测标准的情况下,才会进行CDI检测。比较了实施前后每1 000个病人日订购的CDI检查次数、每1 000个病人日的阳性检查次数以及阳性检查的比例。结果:干预后,每1000个病人日的检查次数从8.2次下降到5.7次。干预后,每1,000个病人日的阳性检测从2.2例增加到3.5例。这表明阳性检测的比例从27%增加到61%。讨论:该干预措施减少了CDI检查订单数,但增加了CDI发病率和检测阳性比例。这可能反映了对CDI的更有针对性的检测和对感染真阳性病例的识别,但我们不能排除在研究期间CDI活性同时增加的可能性。通过教育和电子提醒CDI检测的临床指标,减少了艰难梭菌检测的频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
No Conflicting Loyalties in Parents When Their Healthy Child Donates Stem Cells to a Severely Ill Sibling: An Interview Study. Digital Stories Created by Children With Advanced Cancer. Examining Factors in the Decision to Sperm Bank by Adolescent and Young Adult Males Diagnosed With Cancer: A Review of the Literature. A Quality Approach to Blinatumomab Delivery in Pediatric Oncology: A Children's Oncology Group Study. The Use of Complementary and Integrative Medicine in Combination With Pharmacological Antiemetics to Address Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Pediatric Oncology: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1