Does percutaneous cholecystostomy affect prognosis of patients with acute cholecystitis that are unresponsive to conservative treatment?

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.4103/sjg.sjg_87_23
Danny Hazan, Eyal Leibovitz, Muhamad Jazmawi, Mordechai Shimonov
{"title":"Does percutaneous cholecystostomy affect prognosis of patients with acute cholecystitis that are unresponsive to conservative treatment?","authors":"Danny Hazan, Eyal Leibovitz, Muhamad Jazmawi, Mordechai Shimonov","doi":"10.4103/sjg.sjg_87_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) can be used as bridging or definitive therapy in some cases of acute cholecystitis. We aimed to compare hospital stay and survival of patients that underwent PC insertion because of acute calculus cholecystitis (ACC) compared to those who did not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study in which patients with gangrenous cholecystitis and perforation were excluded. Regression models were used to evaluate the influence of PC on mortality and hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred and eighty-three patients were admitted because of ACC, and 50 patients were referred to PC. Indication for PC insertion were high disease severity index (DSI, 8 pts) and failure of conservative treatment with total disease duration >7 days (42 pts). Those who underwent PC were older (76.0 ± 12.4 vs. 60.8 ± 19.2, P < 0.001); PC was associated with longer hospital stay (12.8 vs. 6.5 days) and higher one-year mortality (20% vs. 4.9%, P < 0.001). Among patients with non-severe disease severity index (DSI), PC was associated with longer length of hospital stay and higher one-year mortality compared to patients treated conservatively (9.9 ± 0.6 vs. 6.0 ± 0.2 days, and 16.7% vs. 4.0%, respectively, P < 0.001 for both). For patients with severe DSI, PC was associated with similar length of hospital stay and one-year mortality compared to similar patients treated conservatively (16.1 ± 8.1 vs. 18.4 ± 4.0 days, and 37.5% vs. 22.6%, respectively, P = 0.802 and P = 0.389, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with mild-moderate DSI unresponsive to conservative treatment, PC may be associated with deteriorated prognosis compared to conservative treatment. The decision to insert PC in patients unresponsive to conservative therapy even with disease duration >7 days must be re-evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":48881,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10754375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_87_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) can be used as bridging or definitive therapy in some cases of acute cholecystitis. We aimed to compare hospital stay and survival of patients that underwent PC insertion because of acute calculus cholecystitis (ACC) compared to those who did not.

Methods: This is a retrospective study in which patients with gangrenous cholecystitis and perforation were excluded. Regression models were used to evaluate the influence of PC on mortality and hospital stay.

Results: Six hundred and eighty-three patients were admitted because of ACC, and 50 patients were referred to PC. Indication for PC insertion were high disease severity index (DSI, 8 pts) and failure of conservative treatment with total disease duration >7 days (42 pts). Those who underwent PC were older (76.0 ± 12.4 vs. 60.8 ± 19.2, P < 0.001); PC was associated with longer hospital stay (12.8 vs. 6.5 days) and higher one-year mortality (20% vs. 4.9%, P < 0.001). Among patients with non-severe disease severity index (DSI), PC was associated with longer length of hospital stay and higher one-year mortality compared to patients treated conservatively (9.9 ± 0.6 vs. 6.0 ± 0.2 days, and 16.7% vs. 4.0%, respectively, P < 0.001 for both). For patients with severe DSI, PC was associated with similar length of hospital stay and one-year mortality compared to similar patients treated conservatively (16.1 ± 8.1 vs. 18.4 ± 4.0 days, and 37.5% vs. 22.6%, respectively, P = 0.802 and P = 0.389, respectively).

Conclusions: In patients with mild-moderate DSI unresponsive to conservative treatment, PC may be associated with deteriorated prognosis compared to conservative treatment. The decision to insert PC in patients unresponsive to conservative therapy even with disease duration >7 days must be re-evaluated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮胆囊造口术是否会影响保守治疗无效的急性胆囊炎患者的预后?
背景:经皮胆囊造口术(PC)可作为急性胆囊炎的桥接或最终治疗。我们的目的是比较因急性结石性胆囊炎(ACC)而接受PC插入的患者与未接受PC插入的患者的住院时间和生存率。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,排除坏疽性胆囊炎和穿孔。采用回归模型评估PC对死亡率和住院时间的影响。结果:683例患者因ACC入院,50例患者转诊为PC。植入术指征为疾病严重程度指数高(DSI, 8分),保守治疗失败,总病程bb7天(42分)。接受PC的患者年龄较大(76.0±12.4比60.8±19.2,P < 0.001);PC与较长的住院时间(12.8天对6.5天)和较高的1年死亡率相关(20%对4.9%,P < 0.001)。在非严重疾病严重程度指数(DSI)的患者中,与保守治疗的患者相比,PC与更长的住院时间和更高的一年死亡率相关(分别为9.9±0.6天对6.0±0.2天,16.7%对4.0%,P均< 0.001)。对于严重DSI患者,与保守治疗的类似患者相比,PC与相似的住院时间和一年死亡率相关(分别为16.1±8.1天对18.4±4.0天,37.5%对22.6%,P = 0.802和P = 0.389)。结论:在对保守治疗无反应的轻中度DSI患者中,与保守治疗相比,PC可能与预后恶化有关。对于对保守治疗无反应的患者,即使病程持续7天,也必须重新评估植入PC的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology (SJG) is an open access peer-reviewed publication. Authors are invited to submit articles in the field of gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition, with a wide spectrum of coverage including basic science, epidemiology, diagnostics, therapeutics, public health, and standards of health care in relation to the concerned specialty. Review articles are usually by invitation. However review articles of current interest and a high standard of scientific value could also be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of vedolizumab in advanced therapy-experienced ulcerative colitis patients: Real world data from the Inflammatory Bowel Disease of the Middle East (IBD-ME) Registry group. Rethinking about the definition of GERD. CEBPB dampens the cuproptosis sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells by facilitating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Unravelling the therapeutic landscape of bile acid-based therapies in gastrointestinal disorders. Exploring the association between microscopic colitis and celiac disease: A comprehensive analysis using the national in-patient data (2016-2019).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1