Reading others’ social appraisals after viewing an aversive film online impacts mood but not intrusive memories

IF 5.4 3区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL ACS Applied Energy Materials Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102763
Lisa Espinosa , Laura Singh , Tabea Eimer , Andreas Olsson , Emily A. Holmes
{"title":"Reading others’ social appraisals after viewing an aversive film online impacts mood but not intrusive memories","authors":"Lisa Espinosa ,&nbsp;Laura Singh ,&nbsp;Tabea Eimer ,&nbsp;Andreas Olsson ,&nbsp;Emily A. Holmes","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Exposure to aversive footage online can affect our well-being, but to what extent does reading others’ appraisals of this content modulate our affective responses? In a pre-registered online study (N = 170), we used a digital trauma film paradigm as an analogue for the naturalistic exposure to aversive visual content online. We investigated whether online social reappraisal about the film influenced acute affective responses and subsequent intrusive memories. First, we examined whether the digital trauma film paradigm induced similar affective responses as in-lab experiments (within-subjects; change in negative mood and intrusive memories of the film during seven days). Participants reported a negative mood change and experienced intrusive memories of the film, extending findings from in-lab experiments. Next, we tested a social reappraisal manipulation that provides written comments from (fictitious) previous participants (between-subjects; reading positive, negative, or no comments) modulated participants’ affective responses. As predicted, relative to controls and negative comments, reading positive comments decreased negative mood. However, reading negative comments did not increase negative mood. Contrary to predictions, the social reappraisal manipulation did not modulate the number of intrusive memories. Findings suggest the benefit of positive social reappraisal for mitigating negative mood, but not intrusive memories following aversive film content online.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618523001019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exposure to aversive footage online can affect our well-being, but to what extent does reading others’ appraisals of this content modulate our affective responses? In a pre-registered online study (N = 170), we used a digital trauma film paradigm as an analogue for the naturalistic exposure to aversive visual content online. We investigated whether online social reappraisal about the film influenced acute affective responses and subsequent intrusive memories. First, we examined whether the digital trauma film paradigm induced similar affective responses as in-lab experiments (within-subjects; change in negative mood and intrusive memories of the film during seven days). Participants reported a negative mood change and experienced intrusive memories of the film, extending findings from in-lab experiments. Next, we tested a social reappraisal manipulation that provides written comments from (fictitious) previous participants (between-subjects; reading positive, negative, or no comments) modulated participants’ affective responses. As predicted, relative to controls and negative comments, reading positive comments decreased negative mood. However, reading negative comments did not increase negative mood. Contrary to predictions, the social reappraisal manipulation did not modulate the number of intrusive memories. Findings suggest the benefit of positive social reappraisal for mitigating negative mood, but not intrusive memories following aversive film content online.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在网上看了一部令人厌恶的电影后,阅读他人的社会评价会影响情绪,但不会影响侵入性记忆。
在网上接触令人厌恶的视频会影响我们的幸福感,但阅读他人对这些内容的评价会在多大程度上调节我们的情感反应?在一项预先注册的在线研究中(N=170),我们使用数字创伤电影范式作为对厌恶性视觉内容的自然暴露的模拟。我们调查了在线社会对这部电影的重新评价是否影响了急性情感反应和随后的侵入性记忆。首先,我们研究了数字创伤电影范式是否诱导了与实验室实验相似的情感反应(在受试者体内;七天内负面情绪的变化和对电影的侵入性记忆)。参与者报告了负面的情绪变化,并经历了对电影的侵入性记忆,扩展了实验室实验的发现。接下来,我们测试了一种社会重新评价操作,该操作提供了来自(虚构的)先前参与者的书面评论(在受试者之间;阅读积极、消极或无评论),调节了参与者的情感反应。正如预测的那样,相对于对照组和负面评论,阅读正面评论会降低负面情绪。然而,阅读负面评论并没有增加负面情绪。与预测相反,社会重新评价操作并没有调节侵入性记忆的数量。研究结果表明,积极的社会重新评价有助于缓解负面情绪,但不会对网上令人厌恶的电影内容产生侵入性记忆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Energy Materials
ACS Applied Energy Materials Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1368
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
期刊最新文献
Red ginseng polysaccharide promotes ferroptosis in gastric cancer cells by inhibiting PI3K/Akt pathway through down-regulation of AQP3. Diagnostic value of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT for predicting the pathological grade of prostate cancer. Correction. Wilms' tumor 1 -targeting cancer vaccine: Recent advancements and future perspectives. Toll-like receptor agonists as cancer vaccine adjuvants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1