Prognostic value of myocardial scar in ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular Journal of Africa Pub Date : 2023-07-23 Epub Date: 2022-09-23 DOI:10.5830/CVJA-2022-040
Reem Laymouna, Eman El-Sharkawy, Salah El-Taha, Mohamed Elfiky
{"title":"Prognostic value of myocardial scar in ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.","authors":"Reem Laymouna, Eman El-Sharkawy, Salah El-Taha, Mohamed Elfiky","doi":"10.5830/CVJA-2022-040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this research was to evaluate the prognostic value of myocardial scar using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and fifty-four patients with either ICM or NICM underwent CMR with late gadolinium enhancement sequences for assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and detection and quantification of any myocardial scar using three methods: manual, number of segments involved, and percentage of scarred myocardium. Patients were followed up for at least six months for clinical cardiac events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were divided into two groups: group I, patients with ICM (58%) and group II, those with NICM (42%). Clinical presentation ranged from eventless lpar;10%) to chest pain (18%), heart failure (15%), hospitalisation (35%), syncope (1%), ventricular tachycardia (< 1%) and cardiac arrest (< 1%). The scar mass was larger in size in group I (17 ± 15%) than in group II (8 ± 13%). A direct relationship was observed between scar size and event severity (<i>p</i> < 0.001). An inverse relationship between LVEF and event severity was found in group I (<i>p</i> < 0.001) but not in group II (<i>p</i> = 0.128).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Myocardial scar size was a strong predictor of clinical outcome in both the ICM and NICM patients. LVEF was less reliable in predicting morbidity in cardiomyopathy patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9434,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Journal of Africa","volume":"34 3","pages":"132-139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10658723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Journal of Africa","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2022-040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this research was to evaluate the prognostic value of myocardial scar using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).

Methods: One hundred and fifty-four patients with either ICM or NICM underwent CMR with late gadolinium enhancement sequences for assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and detection and quantification of any myocardial scar using three methods: manual, number of segments involved, and percentage of scarred myocardium. Patients were followed up for at least six months for clinical cardiac events.

Results: Patients were divided into two groups: group I, patients with ICM (58%) and group II, those with NICM (42%). Clinical presentation ranged from eventless lpar;10%) to chest pain (18%), heart failure (15%), hospitalisation (35%), syncope (1%), ventricular tachycardia (< 1%) and cardiac arrest (< 1%). The scar mass was larger in size in group I (17 ± 15%) than in group II (8 ± 13%). A direct relationship was observed between scar size and event severity (p < 0.001). An inverse relationship between LVEF and event severity was found in group I (p < 0.001) but not in group II (p = 0.128).

Conclusions: Myocardial scar size was a strong predictor of clinical outcome in both the ICM and NICM patients. LVEF was less reliable in predicting morbidity in cardiomyopathy patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏磁共振成像对缺血性和非缺血性心肌病心肌瘢痕的预后价值。
目的:本研究的目的是评价心脏磁共振(CMR)成像对缺血性心肌病(ICM)和非缺血性心肌病(NICM)患者心肌瘢痕的预后价值。方法:154例ICM或NICM患者接受CMR晚期钆增强序列,评估左室射血分数(LVEF),并使用三种方法检测和量化任何心肌瘢痕:手工、累及节段数和瘢痕心肌百分比。对患者进行了至少6个月的临床心脏事件随访。结果:患者分为两组:ⅰ组为ICM患者(58%),ⅱ组为NICM患者(42%)。临床表现从无事件(10%)到胸痛(18%)、心力衰竭(15%)、住院(35%)、晕厥(1%)、室性心动过速(< 1%)和心脏骤停(< 1%)不等。瘢痕肿块I组(17±15%)大于II组(8±13%)。瘢痕大小与事件严重程度之间存在直接关系(p < 0.001)。LVEF与事件严重程度在I组呈负相关(p < 0.001),而在II组无相关(p = 0.128)。结论:心肌瘢痕大小是ICM和NICM患者临床预后的重要预测因子。LVEF在预测心肌病患者发病率方面不太可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Journal of Africa
Cardiovascular Journal of Africa CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cardiovascular Journal of Africa (CVJA) is an international peer-reviewed journal that keeps cardiologists up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include coronary disease, electrophysiology, valve disease, imaging techniques, congenital heart disease (fetal, paediatric and adult), heart failure, surgery, and basic science.
期刊最新文献
Disparities in patients' understanding of cardiovascular disease management. High intracardiac clot burden in a young mother with peripartum cardiomyopathy in Uganda. The temporal relationship between body composition and cardiometabolic profiles in an HIV-infected (on antiretroviral therapy) versus HIV-free Western Cape study population. Evaluation of cardiac function in paediatric Wilson's disease patients with advanced echocardiographic modalities (strain and strain rate echocardiography). The role of C-reactive protein:albumin ratio and Neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio in predicting coronary artery disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1