Exploring the Relationship Between Masseter and Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Young Adults with Normal Hearing.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2165-0935
Rutuja Vispute, Anuj Kumar Neupane
{"title":"Exploring the Relationship Between Masseter and Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Young Adults with Normal Hearing.","authors":"Rutuja Vispute,&nbsp;Anuj Kumar Neupane","doi":"10.1055/a-2165-0935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) and masseter vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (mVEMPs) are considered to have a common saccular origin. While a few studies have examined both VEMPs in individuals with brainstem disorders as part of a test battery, the relation between these two potentials has rarely been the subject of discussion.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study explored the relation between mVEMPs and cVEMPs using EMG-scaled parameters in normal-hearing young adults.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Within-subject study design Study Sample: Twenty young adults between 18 to 39 years of age (11 males, 9 females) participated in the study.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong>cVEMP and mVEMP were performed on all the participants at 95dBnHL with 500Hz tone burst stimuli. Various VEMP parameters were evaluated including P13 and N23 peak latencies, the amplitude of the P13-N23 complex, and the Interaural Amplitude Asymmetry Ratio (IAAR) in EMG-scaled and unscaled conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants exhibited a 100% response rate for cVEMP and mVEMP responses. There were no significant ears and gender effect for both cVEMP and mVEMP. No correlation was found between cVEMP and mVEMP. There was no significant difference found between P1 and N1 latency values of cVEMP and mVEMP; however, a significant variation was observed for peak to peak amplitude both in EMG scaled and unscaled conditions between cVEMP and mVEMP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimal to no association between any parameters of cVEMPs and mVEMPs suggests no significant relationship between these two VEMPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2165-0935","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) and masseter vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (mVEMPs) are considered to have a common saccular origin. While a few studies have examined both VEMPs in individuals with brainstem disorders as part of a test battery, the relation between these two potentials has rarely been the subject of discussion.

Purpose: The present study explored the relation between mVEMPs and cVEMPs using EMG-scaled parameters in normal-hearing young adults.

Research design: Within-subject study design Study Sample: Twenty young adults between 18 to 39 years of age (11 males, 9 females) participated in the study.

Data collection and analysis: cVEMP and mVEMP were performed on all the participants at 95dBnHL with 500Hz tone burst stimuli. Various VEMP parameters were evaluated including P13 and N23 peak latencies, the amplitude of the P13-N23 complex, and the Interaural Amplitude Asymmetry Ratio (IAAR) in EMG-scaled and unscaled conditions.

Results: All participants exhibited a 100% response rate for cVEMP and mVEMP responses. There were no significant ears and gender effect for both cVEMP and mVEMP. No correlation was found between cVEMP and mVEMP. There was no significant difference found between P1 and N1 latency values of cVEMP and mVEMP; however, a significant variation was observed for peak to peak amplitude both in EMG scaled and unscaled conditions between cVEMP and mVEMP.

Conclusions: Minimal to no association between any parameters of cVEMPs and mVEMPs suggests no significant relationship between these two VEMPs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
听力正常青年咬肌与颈前庭诱发肌源电位关系的探讨。
背景:颈前庭诱发肌生成电位(cevps)和咬肌前庭诱发肌生成电位(mVEMPs)被认为具有共同的囊性起源。虽然一些研究已经检查了脑干疾病患者的两种vemp,作为测试电池的一部分,但这两种电位之间的关系很少成为讨论的主题。目的:本研究利用肌电量表参数探讨正常听力青年的mVEMPs和cVEMPs之间的关系。研究设计:主题内研究设计研究样本:20名年龄在18 - 39岁之间的年轻人(11名男性,9名女性)参与研究。数据收集和分析:所有参与者在95dBnHL下,在500Hz的音调爆发刺激下进行cVEMP和mVEMP。在肌电标度和非标度条件下,评估VEMP的各项参数,包括P13和N23峰潜伏期、P13-N23复合物的振幅和耳间振幅不对称比(IAAR)。结果:所有参与者对cVEMP和mVEMP的反应均有100%的反应率。cVEMP和mVEMP均无显著的耳朵效应和性别效应。cVEMP与mVEMP无相关性。cVEMP与mVEMP的P1、N1潜伏期值差异无统计学意义;然而,cVEMP和mVEMP在EMG缩放和未缩放条件下的峰间振幅都有显著变化。结论:cVEMPs和mVEMPs的任何参数之间几乎没有关联,表明这两种VEMPs之间没有显著的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between Location of Focal Traumatic Brain Injury and Canal Involved in Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo. The Effect of COVID-19 on the Efferent Auditory System in Adults. Increased Perception of Head Tilt to Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Correlates to Motion Sickness Susceptibility in Vestibular Migraine. A Comparison of Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials via Audiometric and Nonaudiometric Bone Vibrators. Comparison of Multifrequency Narrow-Band CE-Chirp and Tone Burst Evoked Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1