Retrospective Cohort Study of Safety Outcomes Associated with Opioid Rotations to Buprenorphine.

Neil K Shah, Michael W Chandler, Anne V Cetto, Lisa L Luciani, Jacob Painter, Danielle Bailey
{"title":"Retrospective Cohort Study of Safety Outcomes Associated with Opioid Rotations to Buprenorphine.","authors":"Neil K Shah,&nbsp;Michael W Chandler,&nbsp;Anne V Cetto,&nbsp;Lisa L Luciani,&nbsp;Jacob Painter,&nbsp;Danielle Bailey","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2023.2200412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to understand the effect buprenorphine rotations have on respiratory risk and other safety outcomes. This was a retrospective observational study evaluating Veterans who underwent an opioid rotation from full-agonist opioids to buprenorphine products or to alternative opioids. The primary endpoint was change in the Risk Index for Overdose or Serious Opioid-induced Respiratory Depression (RIOSORD) score from baseline to six months post-rotation. Median baseline RIOSORD scores were 26.0 and 18.0 in the Buprenorphine Group and the Alternative Opioid Group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in baseline RIOSORD score. At six months post-rotation, median RIOSORD scores were 23.5 and 23.0 in the Buprenorphine Group and Alternative Opioid Group, respectively. The difference in change in RIOSORD scores between groups was not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.23). However, based on changes in RIOSORD risk class, an 11% and 0% decrease in respiratory risk was observed in the Buprenorphine and Alternative Opioid groups, respectively. This finding may be considered clinically significant given a change in risk was observed as predicted by RIOSORD score. Further research is needed to clarify the effect that opioid rotations have on respiratory depression risk and other safety outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2023.2200412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to understand the effect buprenorphine rotations have on respiratory risk and other safety outcomes. This was a retrospective observational study evaluating Veterans who underwent an opioid rotation from full-agonist opioids to buprenorphine products or to alternative opioids. The primary endpoint was change in the Risk Index for Overdose or Serious Opioid-induced Respiratory Depression (RIOSORD) score from baseline to six months post-rotation. Median baseline RIOSORD scores were 26.0 and 18.0 in the Buprenorphine Group and the Alternative Opioid Group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in baseline RIOSORD score. At six months post-rotation, median RIOSORD scores were 23.5 and 23.0 in the Buprenorphine Group and Alternative Opioid Group, respectively. The difference in change in RIOSORD scores between groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.23). However, based on changes in RIOSORD risk class, an 11% and 0% decrease in respiratory risk was observed in the Buprenorphine and Alternative Opioid groups, respectively. This finding may be considered clinically significant given a change in risk was observed as predicted by RIOSORD score. Further research is needed to clarify the effect that opioid rotations have on respiratory depression risk and other safety outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿片类药物转用丁丙诺啡相关安全性的回顾性队列研究。
本研究的目的是了解丁丙诺啡轮换对呼吸风险和其他安全结果的影响。这是一项回顾性观察性研究,评估了接受阿片类药物从完全激动剂阿片类药物到丁丙诺啡产品或替代阿片类药物轮换的退伍军人。主要终点是药物过量或严重阿片类药物引起的呼吸抑制风险指数(RIOSORD)评分从基线到轮换后6个月的变化。丁丙诺啡组和替代阿片类药物组的中位基线RIOSORD评分分别为26.0和18.0。各组间基线RIOSORD评分差异无统计学意义。在轮换后6个月,丁丙诺啡组和替代阿片类药物组的中位RIOSORD评分分别为23.5和23.0。各组间RIOSORD评分变化差异无统计学意义(p = 0.23)。然而,根据RIOSORD风险等级的变化,丁丙诺啡组和替代阿片类药物组分别观察到呼吸风险降低11%和0%。考虑到RIOSORD评分预测的风险变化,这一发现可能被认为具有临床意义。需要进一步的研究来阐明阿片类药物轮换对呼吸抑制风险和其他安全结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Reasons for Conflicting Evidence Regarding Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP). The Effectiveness of Tramadol in Pain Relief in Chronic Diseases: A Review Based on Clinical Trials. Changes in Pain and Mental Health Symptoms Associated with Prescribed Medicinal Cannabis Use: A One-Year Longitudinal Study. Correction. Comparison of Cannabis-Based Medicinal Product Formulations for Fibromyalgia: A Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1