Human-Centered Design Study to Inform Traceback Cascade Genetic Testing Programs at Three Integrated Health Systems.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Public Health Genomics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-03 DOI:10.1159/000529852
Katrina M Romagnoli, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Mary Cabell Jonas, Rachel Schwiter, Tracey Klinger, Ilene Ladd, Zachary Salvati, Anna DiNucci, Paula Rae Blasi, Leigh Sheridan, Aaron Scrol, Nora B Henrikson
{"title":"Human-Centered Design Study to Inform Traceback Cascade Genetic Testing Programs at Three Integrated Health Systems.","authors":"Katrina M Romagnoli, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Mary Cabell Jonas, Rachel Schwiter, Tracey Klinger, Ilene Ladd, Zachary Salvati, Anna DiNucci, Paula Rae Blasi, Leigh Sheridan, Aaron Scrol, Nora B Henrikson","doi":"10.1159/000529852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A traceback genetic testing program for ovarian cancer has the potential to identify individuals with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and their relatives. Successful implementation depends on understanding and addressing the experiences, barriers, and preferences of the people served.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a remote, human-centered design research study of people with ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer (probands) and people with a family history of ovarian cancer (relatives) at three integrated health systems between May and September 2021. Participants completed activities to elicit their preferences about ovarian cancer genetic testing messaging and to design their ideal experience receiving an invitation to participate in genetic testing. Interview data were analyzed using a rapid thematic analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We interviewed 70 participants and identified five preferred experiences for a traceback program. Participants strongly prefer discussing genetic testing with their doctor but are comfortable discussing with other clinicians. The most highly preferred experience for both probands and relatives was to discuss with a knowledgeable clinician who could answer questions, followed by directed (sent directly to specific people) or passive (shared in a public area) communication. Repeated contact was acceptable for reminders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants were open to receiving information about traceback genetic testing and recognized its value. Participants preferred discussing genetic testing with a trusted clinician. Directed communication was preferable to passive communication. Other valued information included how genetic tests help their family and the cost of genetic testing. These findings are informing traceback cascade genetic testing programs at all three sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529852","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A traceback genetic testing program for ovarian cancer has the potential to identify individuals with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and their relatives. Successful implementation depends on understanding and addressing the experiences, barriers, and preferences of the people served.

Methods: We conducted a remote, human-centered design research study of people with ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer (probands) and people with a family history of ovarian cancer (relatives) at three integrated health systems between May and September 2021. Participants completed activities to elicit their preferences about ovarian cancer genetic testing messaging and to design their ideal experience receiving an invitation to participate in genetic testing. Interview data were analyzed using a rapid thematic analysis approach.

Results: We interviewed 70 participants and identified five preferred experiences for a traceback program. Participants strongly prefer discussing genetic testing with their doctor but are comfortable discussing with other clinicians. The most highly preferred experience for both probands and relatives was to discuss with a knowledgeable clinician who could answer questions, followed by directed (sent directly to specific people) or passive (shared in a public area) communication. Repeated contact was acceptable for reminders.

Conclusion: Participants were open to receiving information about traceback genetic testing and recognized its value. Participants preferred discussing genetic testing with a trusted clinician. Directed communication was preferable to passive communication. Other valued information included how genetic tests help their family and the cost of genetic testing. These findings are informing traceback cascade genetic testing programs at all three sites.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以人为本的设计研究,为三个综合医疗系统的回溯级联基因检测计划提供参考。
导言:卵巢癌回溯基因检测计划有可能识别遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌患者及其亲属。该计划能否成功实施取决于对服务对象的经验、障碍和偏好的了解和处理:我们在 2021 年 5 月至 9 月期间对三个综合医疗系统中的卵巢癌、输卵管癌或腹膜癌患者(原发性患者)和有卵巢癌家族史的患者(亲属)进行了一项远程、以人为本的设计研究。参与者完成了一些活动,以了解他们对卵巢癌基因检测信息的偏好,并设计他们收到基因检测邀请的理想体验。我们采用快速主题分析方法对访谈数据进行了分析:我们对 70 名参与者进行了访谈,确定了回溯计划的五种首选体验。参与者非常喜欢与医生讨论基因检测,但也愿意与其他临床医生讨论。无论是受试者还是亲属,他们最喜欢的体验是与知识渊博并能回答问题的临床医生进行讨论,其次是定向交流(直接发送给特定的人)或被动交流(在公共区域共享)。结论:结论:参与者乐于接受有关追踪基因检测的信息,并认可其价值。参与者更愿意与可信赖的临床医生讨论基因检测问题。直接交流比被动交流更受欢迎。其他有价值的信息包括基因检测如何帮助他们的家庭以及基因检测的费用。这些发现为所有三个地点的回溯级联基因检测计划提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Genomics
Public Health Genomics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.
期刊最新文献
Development, evaluation, and user testing of a decision-making toolkit to promote organizations to implement universal tumor screening for Lynch Syndrome. Next-Generation Public Health Genomics: A Call to Assess the Equitable Implementation, Population Health Impact, and Sustainability of Precision Public Health Applications. Placing Publics in Public Health Genomics. We Need to Stand Together on the Shoulders of Giants: Consolidating Effective Approaches for Translating Genomics into Practice with Implementation Science. Improving Care for Marginalized Populations at Risk for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Innovations that Expanded Reach in the CHARM Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1