Relationships Between Adherence to Guideline Recommendations for Pharmacological Therapy Among Clinicians and Psychotic Symptoms in Patients With Schizophrenia.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology Pub Date : 2023-08-29 DOI:10.1093/ijnp/pyad037
Fumitoshi Kodaka, Kazutaka Ohi, Yuka Yasuda, Michiko Fujimoto, Hidenaga Yamamori, Naomi Hasegawa, Satsuki Ito, Kentaro Fukumoto, Junya Matsumoto, Kenichiro Miura, Norio Yasui-Furukori, Ryota Hashimoto
{"title":"Relationships Between Adherence to Guideline Recommendations for Pharmacological Therapy Among Clinicians and Psychotic Symptoms in Patients With Schizophrenia.","authors":"Fumitoshi Kodaka,&nbsp;Kazutaka Ohi,&nbsp;Yuka Yasuda,&nbsp;Michiko Fujimoto,&nbsp;Hidenaga Yamamori,&nbsp;Naomi Hasegawa,&nbsp;Satsuki Ito,&nbsp;Kentaro Fukumoto,&nbsp;Junya Matsumoto,&nbsp;Kenichiro Miura,&nbsp;Norio Yasui-Furukori,&nbsp;Ryota Hashimoto","doi":"10.1093/ijnp/pyad037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinician adherence to guideline recommendations in the pharmacological therapy of schizophrenia is important for favorable patient outcomes. To evaluate whether prescriptions followed the guidelines for pharmacological therapy of schizophrenia, we recently developed a summary indicator of multiple quality indicators: the individual fitness score (IFS). It is unclear whether adherence to the guidelines is related to patient outcomes. Here, we investigated correlations between the IFS values and psychotic symptoms in patients with schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed whether patients' current prescriptions adhered to the guideline recommendations using the IFS in 47 patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) and 353 patients with non-TRS (total n = 400), respectively. We investigated correlations between the IFS and total scores and scores on the 5 subscales of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Furthermore, we explored correlations between over 2-year longitudinal changes in IFS values and changes in psychotic symptoms in some patients (n = 77).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found significant negative correlation between the IFS and PANSS total score in all patients with schizophrenia (β = -0.18, P = 9.80 × 10-5). The IFS was significantly and nominally negatively correlated with the PANSS total score in patients with non-TRS (Spearman's rho = -0.15, P = 4.40 × 10-3) and patients with TRS (rho = -0.37, P = .011), respectively. The IFS was also significantly and nominally negatively correlated with several factors, such as the negative and depressed factors, in patients with non-TRS and patients with TRS, respectively (P < .05). Furthermore, the change in IFS values was marginally negatively correlated with the changes in PANSS total scores and scores on the positive and depressed factors (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that efforts to improve clinician adherence to guideline recommendations for pharmacological therapy of schizophrenia, as assessed by the IFS, may lead to better outcomes in patients with schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":14134,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","volume":"26 8","pages":"557-565"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a9/27/pyad037.PMC10464927.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyad037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Clinician adherence to guideline recommendations in the pharmacological therapy of schizophrenia is important for favorable patient outcomes. To evaluate whether prescriptions followed the guidelines for pharmacological therapy of schizophrenia, we recently developed a summary indicator of multiple quality indicators: the individual fitness score (IFS). It is unclear whether adherence to the guidelines is related to patient outcomes. Here, we investigated correlations between the IFS values and psychotic symptoms in patients with schizophrenia.

Methods: We assessed whether patients' current prescriptions adhered to the guideline recommendations using the IFS in 47 patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) and 353 patients with non-TRS (total n = 400), respectively. We investigated correlations between the IFS and total scores and scores on the 5 subscales of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Furthermore, we explored correlations between over 2-year longitudinal changes in IFS values and changes in psychotic symptoms in some patients (n = 77).

Results: We found significant negative correlation between the IFS and PANSS total score in all patients with schizophrenia (β = -0.18, P = 9.80 × 10-5). The IFS was significantly and nominally negatively correlated with the PANSS total score in patients with non-TRS (Spearman's rho = -0.15, P = 4.40 × 10-3) and patients with TRS (rho = -0.37, P = .011), respectively. The IFS was also significantly and nominally negatively correlated with several factors, such as the negative and depressed factors, in patients with non-TRS and patients with TRS, respectively (P < .05). Furthermore, the change in IFS values was marginally negatively correlated with the changes in PANSS total scores and scores on the positive and depressed factors (P < .05).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that efforts to improve clinician adherence to guideline recommendations for pharmacological therapy of schizophrenia, as assessed by the IFS, may lead to better outcomes in patients with schizophrenia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床医生对药物治疗指南建议的依从性与精神分裂症患者精神病症状的关系
背景:临床医生在精神分裂症药物治疗中遵守指南建议对患者的良好预后非常重要。为了评估处方是否遵循精神分裂症药物治疗的指导方针,我们最近开发了一个多种质量指标的综合指标:个体健康评分(IFS)。目前尚不清楚遵守指南是否与患者预后有关。在这里,我们研究了IFS值与精神分裂症患者精神病症状之间的相关性。方法:我们分别对47例难治性精神分裂症(TRS)患者和353例非TRS患者(总n = 400)使用IFS评估患者目前的处方是否符合指南建议。我们研究了IFS与总得分以及正负综合征量表(PANSS) 5个分量表得分的相关性。此外,我们探讨了一些患者2年以上IFS值的纵向变化与精神病症状变化之间的相关性(n = 77)。结果:所有精神分裂症患者IFS总分与PANSS总分呈显著负相关(β = -0.18, P = 9.80 × 10-5)。非TRS患者的IFS与PANSS总分呈显著负相关(Spearman’s rho = -0.15, P = 4.40 × 10-3), TRS患者的IFS与PANSS总分呈显著负相关(rho = -0.37, P = 0.011)。在非TRS患者和TRS患者中,IFS也分别与几个因素(如消极因素和抑郁因素)呈显著负相关(P结论:这些发现表明,IFS评估的提高临床医生对精神分裂症药物治疗指南建议的依从性的努力,可能会导致精神分裂症患者更好的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The central focus of the journal is on research that advances understanding of existing and new neuropsychopharmacological agents including their mode of action and clinical application or provides insights into the biological basis of psychiatric disorders and thereby advances their pharmacological treatment. Such research may derive from the full spectrum of biological and psychological fields of inquiry encompassing classical and novel techniques in neuropsychopharmacology as well as strategies such as neuroimaging, genetics, psychoneuroendocrinology and neuropsychology.
期刊最新文献
Anhedonia is associated with a specific depression profile and poor antidepressant response. 17β-estradiol Ameliorates Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Aged Mice via miR-138-5p/SIRT1/HMGB1 Pathway. Risk of cognitive decline among patients with dengue virus infection: A systematic review. Epigenome-Wide DNA Methylation in Unipolar Depression: Predictive Biomarker of Antidepressant Treatment Response? Behavioral and neurophysiological signatures of cognitive control in humans and rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1