Health-care policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico: A continuous case of heterogeneous, reactive, and unequal response

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Policy Open Pub Date : 2023-08-02 DOI:10.1016/j.hpopen.2023.100100
Daniela Bautista-Reyes , Jimena Werner-Sunderland , Alondra Coral Aragón-Gama , José Roberto Cabral Duran , Karla Daniela Contreras Medina , Manuel Urbina-Fuentes , Elysse Bautista-González
{"title":"Health-care policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico: A continuous case of heterogeneous, reactive, and unequal response","authors":"Daniela Bautista-Reyes ,&nbsp;Jimena Werner-Sunderland ,&nbsp;Alondra Coral Aragón-Gama ,&nbsp;José Roberto Cabral Duran ,&nbsp;Karla Daniela Contreras Medina ,&nbsp;Manuel Urbina-Fuentes ,&nbsp;Elysse Bautista-González","doi":"10.1016/j.hpopen.2023.100100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The pandemic in Mexico underlined pre-existing health-care system inequalities. Within the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic, 154 health policies across health institutions were found to be uncoordinated and heterogeneous, leading to health inequalities in access and potential health outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Data &amp; methods</h3><p>Using a rapid qualitative research methodology, data was collected using purposive sampling of institutional policies published for public access on the official websites of the four public health institutions in Mexico from June 16th, 2020 to October 30th, 2021. This policy review used archival analysis to understand the differences in health-care policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico. These policies were classified under the RREAL framework and as a continuation of our first publication.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During this study, categories of public health response and vaccination dominated the policies enacted. The SSA was the main author of publications. There seems to be a more unified policy response. However, health inequalities persist.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The Mexican government continued to be reactive to the increase in cases or the arrival of new variants, rather than preventative. Research and development of policies need to work together in soaring cases like COVID-19 to work more effectively against the economic and epidemiological burden of a pandemic. It is suggested that this “vaccination” should be included in the RREAL classification. Other sectors (i.e. the ministry of foreign affairs) should be considered relevant players in the future management of a pandemic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34527,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy Open","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/45/b9/main.PMC10471918.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229623000126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The pandemic in Mexico underlined pre-existing health-care system inequalities. Within the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic, 154 health policies across health institutions were found to be uncoordinated and heterogeneous, leading to health inequalities in access and potential health outcomes.

Data & methods

Using a rapid qualitative research methodology, data was collected using purposive sampling of institutional policies published for public access on the official websites of the four public health institutions in Mexico from June 16th, 2020 to October 30th, 2021. This policy review used archival analysis to understand the differences in health-care policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico. These policies were classified under the RREAL framework and as a continuation of our first publication.

Results

During this study, categories of public health response and vaccination dominated the policies enacted. The SSA was the main author of publications. There seems to be a more unified policy response. However, health inequalities persist.

Conclusions

The Mexican government continued to be reactive to the increase in cases or the arrival of new variants, rather than preventative. Research and development of policies need to work together in soaring cases like COVID-19 to work more effectively against the economic and epidemiological burden of a pandemic. It is suggested that this “vaccination” should be included in the RREAL classification. Other sectors (i.e. the ministry of foreign affairs) should be considered relevant players in the future management of a pandemic.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥新冠肺炎大流行期间的医疗保健政策:异质性、反应性和不平等反应的连续案例
背景墨西哥的疫情凸显了先前存在的医疗系统不平等。在新冠肺炎大流行的前六个月内,发现卫生机构的154项卫生政策不协调和不均衡,导致在获取和潜在健康结果方面的健康不平等。数据&;方法采用快速定性研究方法,对2020年6月16日至2021年10月30日在墨西哥四家公共卫生机构的官方网站上发布的供公众访问的机构政策进行有目的的抽样,收集数据。这项政策审查使用档案分析来了解墨西哥新冠肺炎大流行期间医疗保健政策的差异。这些政策是在RREAL框架下分类的,是我们第一份出版物的延续。结果在本研究中,公共卫生反应和疫苗接种的类别主导了制定的政策。SSA是出版物的主要作者。似乎有一个更加统一的政策回应。然而,健康不平等现象依然存在。结论墨西哥政府继续对病例增加或新变种的到来作出反应,而不是采取预防措施。政策的研究和制定需要在新冠肺炎等病例激增的情况下共同努力,以更有效地应对疫情带来的经济和流行病学负担。建议将这种“疫苗接种”纳入RREAL分类。其他部门(即外交部)应被视为未来疫情管理的相关参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy Open
Health Policy Open Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
The cost of the reemergence of monkeypox: An overview of health financing in Africa Closing the equity gap: A call for policy and programmatic reforms to ensure inclusive and effective HIV prevention, treatment and care for persons with disabilities in Eastern and Southern Africa Patient’s willingness to pay for improved community health insurance in Tanzania Improving antibiotic prescribing – Recommendations for funding and pricing policies to enhance use of point-of-care tests From theory to practice: Harmonizing taxonomies of trustworthy AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1