Fluoroscopy-free semirigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stone treatment: A prospective single-arm study of feasibility, efficacy, and safety.

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Annals Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-17 DOI:10.4103/UA.UA_181_20
Alfredo Aliaga, Andres Vega Avalos, Rodrigo Sanchez, Sergio Rojas, Felipe Aguila, Fernando Marchant
{"title":"Fluoroscopy-free semirigid ureteroscopy for ureteral stone treatment: A prospective single-arm study of feasibility, efficacy, and safety.","authors":"Alfredo Aliaga,&nbsp;Andres Vega Avalos,&nbsp;Rodrigo Sanchez,&nbsp;Sergio Rojas,&nbsp;Felipe Aguila,&nbsp;Fernando Marchant","doi":"10.4103/UA.UA_181_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients with urolithiasis receive a significant amount of radiation during diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of their pathology, with nearly 20% receiving more than the annual recommended, creating a growing concern regarding radiation exposure faced by patients and health personnel. The objectives of the study were to describe a standardized fluoroscopy-free (FF) semirigid (SR) ureteroscopy (URS) technique for ureteral stone treatment and to determine the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of this technique for the treatment of ureteral stones comparing it to a historical cohort of fluoroscopy-guided (FG) SR-URS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective single-arm study of patients submitted to FF SR-URS was conducted. Visual and tactile cues were employed to avoid the use of ionizing radiation. The success (feasibility), stone-free (efficacy), and complication (safety) rates of each procedure were registered. The results were compared to a historical cohort of patients that underwent FG SR-URS at our center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and five patients subjected to FF SR-URS were included in the study and compared to a historical cohort of 87 patients subjected to FG SR-URS. The main characteristics were comparable among groups. Ninety-seven patients (92.38%) were completed without any use of ionizing radiation. The stone-free rate was 92.45%, similar to the historical cohort. Only Clavien I and II complications were found without statistical difference between the study groups. The average dose of radiation exposure for the historical cohort was approximately 0.5 mSv.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FF SR-URS is a feasible, efficacious, and safe technique for treating the ureteral stones for urologists with good practice of the traditional technique. Implementing this procedure allows a decrease in radiation exposure to both patients and health personnel.</p>","PeriodicalId":23633,"journal":{"name":"Urology Annals","volume":"15 3","pages":"304-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/70/8c/UA-15-304.PMC10471806.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Annals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_181_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with urolithiasis receive a significant amount of radiation during diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of their pathology, with nearly 20% receiving more than the annual recommended, creating a growing concern regarding radiation exposure faced by patients and health personnel. The objectives of the study were to describe a standardized fluoroscopy-free (FF) semirigid (SR) ureteroscopy (URS) technique for ureteral stone treatment and to determine the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of this technique for the treatment of ureteral stones comparing it to a historical cohort of fluoroscopy-guided (FG) SR-URS.

Materials and methods: A prospective single-arm study of patients submitted to FF SR-URS was conducted. Visual and tactile cues were employed to avoid the use of ionizing radiation. The success (feasibility), stone-free (efficacy), and complication (safety) rates of each procedure were registered. The results were compared to a historical cohort of patients that underwent FG SR-URS at our center.

Results: One hundred and five patients subjected to FF SR-URS were included in the study and compared to a historical cohort of 87 patients subjected to FG SR-URS. The main characteristics were comparable among groups. Ninety-seven patients (92.38%) were completed without any use of ionizing radiation. The stone-free rate was 92.45%, similar to the historical cohort. Only Clavien I and II complications were found without statistical difference between the study groups. The average dose of radiation exposure for the historical cohort was approximately 0.5 mSv.

Conclusions: FF SR-URS is a feasible, efficacious, and safe technique for treating the ureteral stones for urologists with good practice of the traditional technique. Implementing this procedure allows a decrease in radiation exposure to both patients and health personnel.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无荧光镜半刚性输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石:可行性、疗效和安全性的前瞻性单臂研究。
目的:尿石症患者在诊断、治疗和病理随访期间接受了大量辐射,近20%的患者接受的辐射量超过了年度建议,这引起了人们对患者和卫生人员面临的辐射暴露的日益担忧。本研究的目的是描述一种用于输尿管结石治疗的标准化无荧光镜(FF)半刚性(SR)输尿管镜(URS)技术,以及该技术治疗输尿管结石的安全性,将其与荧光镜引导(FG)SR-URS的历史队列进行比较。材料和方法:对接受FF SR-URS治疗的患者进行前瞻性单臂研究。视觉和触觉提示被用来避免使用电离辐射。记录每种手术的成功率(可行性)、无结石率(有效性)和并发症率(安全性)。将结果与在我们中心接受FG SR-URS的历史患者队列进行比较。结果:105名接受FF SR-URS的患者被纳入研究,并与87名接受FG SR-URS患者的历史队列进行比较。主要特征在各组之间具有可比性。97名患者(92.38%)在未使用任何电离辐射的情况下完成了治疗。无结石率为92.45%,与历史同期相似。只有Clavien I和II并发症在研究组之间没有统计学差异。历史队列的平均辐射暴露剂量约为0.5mSv。结论:FF SR-URS是一种可行、有效和安全的泌尿科医生治疗输尿管结石的技术,并良好地实践了传统技术。实施该程序可以减少患者和卫生人员的辐射暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Annals
Urology Annals UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊最新文献
Renal cell carcinoma with inferior vena cava thrombus: Survival and prognostic factors in surgically treated patients. Survival rate comparisons of angioembolization and neoadjuvant targeted therapy on unresectable renal cell carcinoma patients: A systematic review. Does tilt-retrograde intrarenal surgery enhance stone clearance and offer better surgical ergonomics in patients with renal calculi? A prospective randomized control study. Factor associated with postoperative complications of inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer Test. Feasibility, efficacy, and safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery in <1-year age group: A single-center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1