Is the Promise of PROMs Being Realized? Implementation Experience in a Large Orthopedic Practice.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Medical Quality Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000079
Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss, Elizabeth S Grossman, Leif I Solberg, Ella A Chrenka, Ann Werner, Stephen E Asche, Christine K Norton, Andy Nelson, Megan Reams, Robin R Whitebird
{"title":"Is the Promise of PROMs Being Realized? Implementation Experience in a Large Orthopedic Practice.","authors":"Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss,&nbsp;Elizabeth S Grossman,&nbsp;Leif I Solberg,&nbsp;Ella A Chrenka,&nbsp;Ann Werner,&nbsp;Stephen E Asche,&nbsp;Christine K Norton,&nbsp;Andy Nelson,&nbsp;Megan Reams,&nbsp;Robin R Whitebird","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), increasingly used for research and quality measurement, are lauded for their potential to improve patient-centered care, both through aggregate reporting and when integrated into clinical practice. However, there are few published studies of the resultant use of PROMs in clinical practice. This case study describes the implementation and use of PROMS in a Midwestern multispecialty medical group orthopedic practice among patients undergoing total knee and hip surgery. Specifically, rates of PROMs use by care teams are tracked over time once made available in the electronic health record. During this time, the orthopedics department achieved a patient PROMS survey response rate of 68% at baseline, 58% 3 months post-surgery, and 55% 12 months post-surgery. However, these data were only accessed by the care teams for fewer than 1% of associated clinical encounters. This suggests that making PROMs available for care team review in the electronic health record, even when coupled with relatively high response rates from patients and departmental leadership support is not enough to encourage integration of PROMs into clinical care for patients. Additional effort is required to identify barriers to PROMs use in clinical care and to test methods to enhance use.</p>","PeriodicalId":7539,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medical Quality","volume":"37 6","pages":"489-494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), increasingly used for research and quality measurement, are lauded for their potential to improve patient-centered care, both through aggregate reporting and when integrated into clinical practice. However, there are few published studies of the resultant use of PROMs in clinical practice. This case study describes the implementation and use of PROMS in a Midwestern multispecialty medical group orthopedic practice among patients undergoing total knee and hip surgery. Specifically, rates of PROMs use by care teams are tracked over time once made available in the electronic health record. During this time, the orthopedics department achieved a patient PROMS survey response rate of 68% at baseline, 58% 3 months post-surgery, and 55% 12 months post-surgery. However, these data were only accessed by the care teams for fewer than 1% of associated clinical encounters. This suggests that making PROMs available for care team review in the electronic health record, even when coupled with relatively high response rates from patients and departmental leadership support is not enough to encourage integration of PROMs into clinical care for patients. Additional effort is required to identify barriers to PROMs use in clinical care and to test methods to enhance use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
毕业舞会的承诺实现了吗?大型骨科实践的实施经验。
患者报告结果测量(PROMs)越来越多地用于研究和质量测量,由于其通过汇总报告和整合到临床实践中改善以患者为中心的护理的潜力而受到称赞。然而,很少有发表的研究结果在临床实践中使用PROMs。本案例研究描述了在中西部多专业医疗团体骨科实践中,在接受全膝关节和髋关节手术的患者中实施和使用PROMS。具体来说,一旦在电子健康记录中可用,护理团队使用prom的比率就会随着时间的推移而被跟踪。在此期间,骨科的患者PROMS调查应答率在基线时为68%,术后3个月为58%,术后12个月为55%。然而,只有不到1%的相关临床接触的护理团队访问了这些数据。这表明,即使患者的响应率相对较高,部门领导的支持也不足以鼓励将PROMs纳入患者的临床护理中,从而使护理团队可以在电子健康记录中查看PROMs。需要额外的努力来确定在临床护理中使用PROMs的障碍,并测试方法以提高使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medical Quality (AJMQ) is focused on keeping readers informed of the resources, processes, and perspectives contributing to quality health care services. This peer-reviewed journal presents a forum for the exchange of ideas, strategies, and methods in improving the delivery and management of health care.
期刊最新文献
Standardized Management of Sickle Cell Disease Patients and the Effects on Care Utilization and Costs Primary Care Provider and Staff Wellness and Burnout Levels and Suggestions to Improve Wellness: Analysis of Survey Findings Preparation of Patients for Central Venous Catheter Care in the Home: Perspectives From Health Care Personnel Handoff Education Interventions: A Scoping Review Focused on Sustaining Improvements A Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome (PACS) Clinic in Rural New England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1