The dose response of erythemal area and intensity on the unprotected skin fits well to a logistic 3P model in SPF tests of a Chinese population, which has the potential to improve the precision and consistency of minimal erythema dose determination.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1111/phpp.12909
Di Qu, Feng Liao, Jianwei Liu, Xiangzi Li, Congxiu Ye, Yue Zheng, Xiaoyuan Xie, Jinling Yi, Wei Lai
{"title":"The dose response of erythemal area and intensity on the unprotected skin fits well to a logistic 3P model in SPF tests of a Chinese population, which has the potential to improve the precision and consistency of minimal erythema dose determination.","authors":"Di Qu, Feng Liao, Jianwei Liu, Xiangzi Li, Congxiu Ye, Yue Zheng, Xiaoyuan Xie, Jinling Yi, Wei Lai","doi":"10.1111/phpp.12909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current ISO guidelines for minimal erythema dose (MED) determination require assessment of erythema area of UV-irradiated skin sites. However, this parameter has not been adequately quantified in daily practice. The aims of this study were to investigate the dose response on the unprotected skin sites by quantifying the erythema area and intensity and to show the potential for improving the precision and consistency of MEDu determination by developing predictive models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Standard radiation tests were conducted on the back of 31 healthy Chinese volunteers and the MEDu site of each subject was clinically determined by dermatologists. Images of test sites were captured 24 h after radiation, and the erythema area (%EA) and intensity (∆a*) were measured by image analysis. The data were fitted to a logistic 3P function to obtain dose-response curves, and a set of logit (inverse-logistic) models were then derived. An erythema area threshold of %EA = 52% was established to predict MEDu based on the clinical endpoints defined by ISO 24444:2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of the clinically determined MEDu sites revealed wide ranges of %EA (62.3 ± 15% SD) and ∆a* (2.96 ± 0.92 SD). The dose response fitted well to a logistic 3P model (mean R<sup>2</sup>  = 0.965 and 0.975 for %EA and ∆a*, respectively). Applying the area threshold, values of MEDu were determined by the logit model for the test population, which significantly improved the consistency of MEDu determination (52 ± 0% SD and 2.73 ± 0.61 SD for %EA and ∆a*, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the dose response of UV-induced erythema can be quantified and modeled once the erythema area and intensity are measured. The results of this study show the potential to improve the precision and consistency of MEDu determination in an SPF test. The similar potential in photodermatological, therapeutic, and diagnostic applications was also implied.</p>","PeriodicalId":20123,"journal":{"name":"Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine","volume":" ","pages":"633-641"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12909","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The current ISO guidelines for minimal erythema dose (MED) determination require assessment of erythema area of UV-irradiated skin sites. However, this parameter has not been adequately quantified in daily practice. The aims of this study were to investigate the dose response on the unprotected skin sites by quantifying the erythema area and intensity and to show the potential for improving the precision and consistency of MEDu determination by developing predictive models.

Methods: Standard radiation tests were conducted on the back of 31 healthy Chinese volunteers and the MEDu site of each subject was clinically determined by dermatologists. Images of test sites were captured 24 h after radiation, and the erythema area (%EA) and intensity (∆a*) were measured by image analysis. The data were fitted to a logistic 3P function to obtain dose-response curves, and a set of logit (inverse-logistic) models were then derived. An erythema area threshold of %EA = 52% was established to predict MEDu based on the clinical endpoints defined by ISO 24444:2019.

Results: Analysis of the clinically determined MEDu sites revealed wide ranges of %EA (62.3 ± 15% SD) and ∆a* (2.96 ± 0.92 SD). The dose response fitted well to a logistic 3P model (mean R2  = 0.965 and 0.975 for %EA and ∆a*, respectively). Applying the area threshold, values of MEDu were determined by the logit model for the test population, which significantly improved the consistency of MEDu determination (52 ± 0% SD and 2.73 ± 0.61 SD for %EA and ∆a*, respectively).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the dose response of UV-induced erythema can be quantified and modeled once the erythema area and intensity are measured. The results of this study show the potential to improve the precision and consistency of MEDu determination in an SPF test. The similar potential in photodermatological, therapeutic, and diagnostic applications was also implied.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在中国人群的SPF试验中,无防护皮肤上红斑面积和强度的剂量响应符合logistic 3P模型,具有提高最小红斑剂量测定精度和一致性的潜力。
背景:目前的ISO最小红斑剂量(MED)测定指南要求评估紫外线照射皮肤部位的红斑面积。然而,在日常实践中,这一参数并没有得到充分的量化。本研究的目的是通过量化红斑面积和强度来研究未受保护皮肤部位的剂量反应,并通过建立预测模型来提高MEDu测定的准确性和一致性。方法:对31名中国健康志愿者背部进行标准辐射试验,由皮肤科医生临床确定每位受试者的MEDu部位。照射后24 h拍摄试验点图像,通过图像分析测量红斑面积(%EA)和强度(∆a*)。将数据拟合为logistic 3P函数,得到剂量-反应曲线,并推导出一组logit(逆logistic)模型。根据ISO 24444:2019定义的临床终点,建立了红斑面积阈值%EA = 52%来预测MEDu。结果:临床测定的MEDu部位分析显示,%EA(62.3±15% SD)和∆a*(2.96±0.92 SD)的范围较宽。剂量反应符合logistic 3P模型(%EA和∆a*的平均R2分别为0.965和0.975)。采用面积阈值法,对试验群体采用logit模型确定MEDu值,显著提高了MEDu测定的一致性(%EA和∆a*分别为52±0% SD和2.73±0.61 SD)。结论:本研究表明,只要测量红斑面积和强度,就可以量化和建模紫外线致红斑的剂量反应。本研究结果显示了在SPF测试中提高MEDu测定精度和一致性的潜力。在光皮肤病学,治疗和诊断应用中也暗示了类似的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is a forum for new information about the direct and distant effects of electromagnetic radiation (ultraviolet, visible and infrared) mediated through skin. The divisions of the editorial board reflect areas of specific interest: aging, carcinogenesis, immunology, instrumentation and optics, lasers, photodynamic therapy, photosensitivity, pigmentation and therapy. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine includes original articles, reviews, communications and editorials. Original articles may include the investigation of experimental or pathological processes in humans or animals in vivo or the investigation of radiation effects in cells or tissues in vitro. Methodology need have no limitation; rather, it should be appropriate to the question addressed.
期刊最新文献
Photoprotective Effect of Taurine-Rich Protamex Extract From Salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) Byproduct Against Ultraviolet B-Induced Skin Damage in Human Dermal Fibroblasts and Zebrafish Model. Could OTC Devices Reduce Disparity of Care? A Comparison of the Spectral Output of Home-Based Narrow-Band UVB Phototherapy Devices to a Prescription Device. Gain of Protection Afforded by the Methoxypropylamino Cyclohexenylidene Ethoxyethylcyanoacetate (MCE) UVA1 Filter on Pigmentary and Aging Signs: An Outdoor 4-Week Randomized, Intra-Individual Comparative Study in 52 Brazilian Women. A Case of Xeroderma Pigmentosum Variant Type With a Novel Mutation Diagnosed in Early Childhood. Evaluation of Reflective Confocal Microscopy in Lupus Miliaris Disseminatus Faciei.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1