Evaluation of Occupational Therapy and Music Therapy Co-Treatment in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-05 DOI:10.1080/01942638.2023.2253894
Maribeth Brinkley, Marial Biard, Isabela Masuoka, Joseph Hagan
{"title":"Evaluation of Occupational Therapy and Music Therapy Co-Treatment in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Maribeth Brinkley, Marial Biard, Isabela Masuoka, Joseph Hagan","doi":"10.1080/01942638.2023.2253894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine co-treatment with music therapy and occupational therapy with infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental design was used to study the effect of standard care occupational therapy (SCOT) vs co-treatment with music therapy (Co-Tx) on behavioral state and physiologic measures. 46 participants were enrolled in the study. Interventions were implemented in approximately 20-minute sessions. Physiologic measures, heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (SpO2), were collected using Sickbay. Behavioral measures were collected using The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) Pain Assessment Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean heartrates during Co-Tx (161.3 ± 15.4 BPM) did not differ significantly compared to SCOT (161.8 ± 15.7 BPM). In unadjusted comparisons, mean SpO2 levels were significantly higher during Co-Tx than SCOT (95.48 ± 3.43% vs. 95.12 ± 3.71%, <i>p</i> = 0.046). There was a significant decrease in pre- to post-test FLACC scores for Co-Tx when compared to SCOT (decrease of 0.97 ± 1.96 vs. 0.61 ± 1.65, <i>p</i> = 0.023). In adjusted comparisons, there were no statistically significant differences in physiological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Co-treatment with music therapy may create a more stable and regulated environment for NICU infants. Further research is recommended on music therapy co-treatment with rehabilitative therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49138,"journal":{"name":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"513-525"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2023.2253894","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To examine co-treatment with music therapy and occupational therapy with infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Methods: A quasi-experimental design was used to study the effect of standard care occupational therapy (SCOT) vs co-treatment with music therapy (Co-Tx) on behavioral state and physiologic measures. 46 participants were enrolled in the study. Interventions were implemented in approximately 20-minute sessions. Physiologic measures, heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (SpO2), were collected using Sickbay. Behavioral measures were collected using The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) Pain Assessment Tool.

Results: Mean heartrates during Co-Tx (161.3 ± 15.4 BPM) did not differ significantly compared to SCOT (161.8 ± 15.7 BPM). In unadjusted comparisons, mean SpO2 levels were significantly higher during Co-Tx than SCOT (95.48 ± 3.43% vs. 95.12 ± 3.71%, p = 0.046). There was a significant decrease in pre- to post-test FLACC scores for Co-Tx when compared to SCOT (decrease of 0.97 ± 1.96 vs. 0.61 ± 1.65, p = 0.023). In adjusted comparisons, there were no statistically significant differences in physiological outcomes.

Conclusions: Co-treatment with music therapy may create a more stable and regulated environment for NICU infants. Further research is recommended on music therapy co-treatment with rehabilitative therapies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿重症监护室职业疗法和音乐疗法联合治疗评估。
目的:对新生儿重症监护室(NICU)中的婴儿进行音乐疗法和职业疗法联合治疗:采用准实验设计,研究标准护理职业疗法(SCOT)与音乐疗法联合治疗(Co-Tx)对行为状态和生理指标的影响。46 名参与者参加了研究。干预以约 20 分钟的疗程进行。生理指标、心率(HR)和血氧饱和度(SpO2)通过 Sickbay 收集。行为测量采用面部、腿部、活动、哭泣和安慰性(FLACC)疼痛评估工具进行收集:结果:Co-Tx 期间的平均心率(161.3 ± 15.4 BPM)与 SCOT 期间的平均心率(161.8 ± 15.7 BPM)相比没有显著差异。在未经调整的比较中,Co-Tx 期间的平均 SpO2 水平明显高于 SCOT(95.48 ± 3.43% vs. 95.12 ± 3.71%,p = 0.046)。与 SCOT 相比,Co-Tx 在测试前和测试后的 FLACC 分数明显下降(下降幅度为 0.97 ± 1.96 vs. 0.61 ± 1.65,p = 0.023)。在调整后的比较中,生理结果没有显著的统计学差异:结论:音乐疗法联合治疗可为新生儿重症监护室的婴儿创造更稳定、更规范的环境。建议进一步研究音乐疗法与康复疗法的联合治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: 5 issues per year Abstracted and/or indexed in: AMED; British Library Inside; Child Development Abstracts; CINAHL; Contents Pages in Education; EBSCO; Education Research Abstracts (ERA); Education Resources Information Center (ERIC); EMCARE; Excerpta Medica/EMBASE; Family and Society Studies Worldwide; Family Index Database; Google Scholar; HaPI Database; HINARI; Index Copernicus; Intute; JournalSeek; MANTIS; MEDLINE; NewJour; OCLC; OTDBASE; OT SEARCH; Otseeker; PEDro; ProQuest; PsycINFO; PSYCLINE; PubsHub; PubMed; REHABDATA; SCOPUS; SIRC; Social Work Abstracts; Speical Educational Needs Abstracts; SwetsWise; Zetoc (British Library); Science Citation Index Expanded (also known as SciSearch®); Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition; Social Sciences Citation Index®; Journal Citation Reports/ Social Sciences Edition; Current Contents®/Social and Behavioral Sciences; Current Contents®/Clinical Medicine
期刊最新文献
Knowledge Translation Interventions to Increase the Uptake of Evidence-Based Practice Among Pediatric Rehabilitation Professionals: A Systematic Review. Letter to the Editor. Development and Validation of the Participation Questionnaire for Preschoolers with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Structural Validity, Internal Consistency, and Construct Validity. Home Participation of Infants With and Without Biological Risk in the First Year of Life: A Cross-Sectional and Comparative Study. Telehealth of Infants at Risk During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Physical Therapists' and Caregiver's Perceptions and Costs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1