Importance, quality, and engagement: School mental health providers' perceptions regarding within-district transition care coordination practices.

School psychology (Washington, D.C.) Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1037/spq0000569
Malena A Nygaard, Tyler L Renshaw, Heather E Ormiston, Jack Komer, Austin Matthews
{"title":"Importance, quality, and engagement: School mental health providers' perceptions regarding within-district transition care coordination practices.","authors":"Malena A Nygaard, Tyler L Renshaw, Heather E Ormiston, Jack Komer, Austin Matthews","doi":"10.1037/spq0000569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although care coordination (CC; i.e., the organization of care activities between professionals to facilitate appropriate service delivery; McDonald et al., 2007) has yet to be studied extensively within schools, preliminary research suggests coordinating school mental health supports can be beneficial (Francis et al., 2021) and that interprofessional and interagency collaboration is warranted to meet student needs (McClain et al., 2022). We examined the perceptions of school mental health providers (SMHPs) regarding importance, quality, and engagement with within-district transition CC practices within a multitiered system of support framework. Participants were 163 SMHPs who endorsed being involved in designing, providing, or implementing mental health services in a U.S. school district. The three scales used to measure engagement with CC practices were based on the <i>Care Coordination Measures Atlas</i> (McDonald et al., 2014) and were found to have promising preliminary psychometrics. Descriptive statistics indicated SMHPs endorsed CC as very important but perceived school and district personnel to view it as less important, reported their own quality of CC was slightly above that of their school and district, and regularly engaged in broad CC practices. Moreover, bivariate correlations indicated SMHP's personal views of CC importance were not associated with the quality of school and district CC, yet engagement in broad CC activities was associated with transition facilitation practices, and attitudes about CC were associated with engagement in broad CC activities. Implications of findings are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":74763,"journal":{"name":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":"366-376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School psychology (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although care coordination (CC; i.e., the organization of care activities between professionals to facilitate appropriate service delivery; McDonald et al., 2007) has yet to be studied extensively within schools, preliminary research suggests coordinating school mental health supports can be beneficial (Francis et al., 2021) and that interprofessional and interagency collaboration is warranted to meet student needs (McClain et al., 2022). We examined the perceptions of school mental health providers (SMHPs) regarding importance, quality, and engagement with within-district transition CC practices within a multitiered system of support framework. Participants were 163 SMHPs who endorsed being involved in designing, providing, or implementing mental health services in a U.S. school district. The three scales used to measure engagement with CC practices were based on the Care Coordination Measures Atlas (McDonald et al., 2014) and were found to have promising preliminary psychometrics. Descriptive statistics indicated SMHPs endorsed CC as very important but perceived school and district personnel to view it as less important, reported their own quality of CC was slightly above that of their school and district, and regularly engaged in broad CC practices. Moreover, bivariate correlations indicated SMHP's personal views of CC importance were not associated with the quality of school and district CC, yet engagement in broad CC activities was associated with transition facilitation practices, and attitudes about CC were associated with engagement in broad CC activities. Implications of findings are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重要性、质量和参与度:学校心理健康服务提供者对区内过渡护理协调实践的看法。
尽管护理协调(CC;即组织专业人员之间的护理活动,以促进适当的服务提供;McDonald 等人,2007 年)尚未在学校内得到广泛研究,但初步研究表明,协调学校心理健康支持是有益的(Francis 等人,2021 年),并且需要跨专业和跨机构合作以满足学生的需求(McClain 等人,2022 年)。我们研究了学校心理健康服务提供者(SMHPs)对多层次支持系统框架内区内过渡辅导实践的重要性、质量和参与度的看法。参与研究的 163 名学校心理健康服务提供者均表示参与了美国学区心理健康服务的设计、提供或实施。用于衡量参与CC实践的三个量表是基于护理协调措施图集(McDonald等人,2014年),并被认为具有良好的初步心理测量学效果。描述性统计表明,SMHPs 认为关怀协调非常重要,但认为学校和学区人员认为其不那么重要,他们报告说自己的关怀协调质量略高于学校和学区的质量,并经常参与广泛的关怀协调实践。此外,双变量相关性表明,SMHP个人对CC重要性的看法与学校和地区CC的质量无关,但参与广泛的CC活动与过渡促进实践有关,对CC的态度与参与广泛的CC活动有关。本文讨论了研究结果的意义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Randomization in single-case design experiments: Addressing threats to internal validity. Using mixed methods to improve understanding and advancement of mixed methods research in school psychology. Poisson regression is the best method to analyze cumulative adverse childhood experiences. Youth mental health first aid for educators of immigrant-origin youth: A mixed-method evaluation of the virtual delivery approach. Academic screening in middle school: Exploring bivariate and intraindividual relations in reading and math performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1